IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/juipol/v97y2025ics0957178725001742.html

European and US approaches to energy poverty: Classifying and evaluating design strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Heller, Peter
  • Schittekatte, Tim
  • Barrella, Roberto
  • Mastropietro, Paolo
  • Batlle, Carlos

Abstract

As climate change accelerates and recent health, energy, and inflation crises exacerbate broader inequality trends, ensuring adequate and affordable access to energy services is becoming increasingly important. In this paper, we conduct an in-depth review of energy poverty policy and program design in Europe and the United States. We classify and evaluate different approaches according to four categories of policy choices: assistance, targeting, funding, and governance. We discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the approaches adopted in both contexts, extract key lessons, and provide recommendations to improve the effectiveness of energy assistance policies. The taxonomy presented here is not intended as a tool for evaluating program effectiveness. Instead, it is meant to help us understand how specific design decisions may impact program outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Heller, Peter & Schittekatte, Tim & Barrella, Roberto & Mastropietro, Paolo & Batlle, Carlos, 2025. "European and US approaches to energy poverty: Classifying and evaluating design strategies," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:97:y:2025:i:c:s0957178725001742
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2025.102059
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725001742
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jup.2025.102059?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carley, Sanya & Engle, Caroline & Konisky, David M., 2021. "An analysis of energy justice programs across the United States," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    2. Palma, Pedro & Barrella, Roberto & Gouveia, João Pedro & Romero, José Carlos, 2024. "Comparative analysis of energy poverty definition and measurement in Portugal and Spain," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    3. Audrey Dobbins & Francesco Fuso Nerini & Paul Deane & Steve Pye, 2019. "Strengthening the EU response to energy poverty," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 4(1), pages 2-5, January.
    4. Giovanni Andrea Cornia & Frances Stewart, 1993. "Two errors of targeting," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 5(5), pages 459-496, September.
      • Giovanni Andrea Cornia & Frances Stewart, 1993. "Two Errors of Targeting," Papers iopeps93/54, Innocenti Occasional Papers, Economic Policy Series.
    5. Thomas Blanchet & Lucas Chancel & Amory Gethin, 2022. "Why Is Europe More Equal than the United States?," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 14(4), pages 480-518, October.
    6. Drescher, Katharina & Janzen, Benedikt, 2021. "Determinants, persistence, and dynamics of energy poverty: An empirical assessment using German household survey data," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    7. Stephen Devereux & Edoardo Masset & Rachel Sabates-Wheeler & Michael Samson & Althea-Maria Rivas & Dolf te Lintelo, 2017. "The targeting effectiveness of social transfers," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 162-211, April.
    8. Giraudet, Louis-Gaëtan & Bourgeois, Cyril & Quirion, Philippe, 2021. "Policies for low-carbon and affordable home heating: A French outlook," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    9. Dominic J. Bednar & Tony G. Reames, 2020. "Recognition of and response to energy poverty in the United States," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 5(6), pages 432-439, June.
    10. Legendre, Bérangère & Ricci, Olivia, 2015. "Measuring fuel poverty in France: Which households are the most fuel vulnerable?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 620-628.
    11. Sanya Carley & David M. Konisky, 2020. "The justice and equity implications of the clean energy transition," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 5(8), pages 569-577, August.
    12. Best, Rohan & Sinha, Kompal, 2021. "Fuel poverty policy: Go big or go home insulation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    13. Baker, Shalanda H. & Carley, Sanya & Konisky, David M., 2021. "Energy insecurity and the urgent need for utility disconnection protections," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    14. Charlier, Dorothée & Legendre, Bérangère, 2021. "Fuel poverty in industrialized countries: Definition, measures and policy implications a review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    15. James J. Heckman & Jeffrey A. Smith, 2004. "The Determinants of Participation in a Social Program: Evidence from a Prototypical Job Training Program," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 22(2), pages 243-298, April.
    16. Trevor Memmott & Sanya Carley & Michelle Graff & David M. Konisky, 2021. "Sociodemographic disparities in energy insecurity among low-income households before and during the COVID-19 pandemic," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 6(2), pages 186-193, February.
    17. Johnson, Erik & Beppler, Ross & Blackburn, Chris & Staver, Benjamin & Brown, Marilyn & Matisoff, Daniel, 2017. "Peak shifting and cross-class subsidization: The impacts of solar PV on changes in electricity costs," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 436-444.
    18. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Lipson, Matthew M. & Chard, Rose, 2019. "Temporality, vulnerability, and energy justice in household low carbon innovations," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 495-504.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Charlier, Dorothée & Legendre, Bérangère, 2021. "Fuel poverty in industrialized countries: Definition, measures and policy implications a review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    2. Ren, Weihang & Guan, Yongpei & Qiu, Feng & Levin, Todd & Heleno, Miguel, 2025. "Energy justice and equity: A Review of definitions, measures, and practice in policy, planning, and operations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    3. Gao, Xue & Zhou, Shan, 2022. "Solar adoption inequality in the U.S.: Trend, magnitude, and solar justice policies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    4. Okushima, Shinichiro, 2021. "Energy poor need more energy, but do they need more carbon? Evaluation of people's basic carbon needs," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    5. Kwon, Minji & Cong, Shuchen & Nock, Destenie & Huang, Luling & Qiu, Yueming (Lucy) & Xing, Bo, 2023. "Forgone summertime comfort as a function of avoided electricity use," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    6. Keran Sarah Boyd & Christian Calvillo & Tanja Mueller & Xiaoyi Mu & Tong Zhu, 2023. "The Intersection of Fuel and Transport Policy in Scotland: A Review of Policy, Definitions and Metrics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-14, June.
    7. Helmke-Long, Laura & Carley, Sanya & Konisky, David M., 2022. "Municipal government adaptive capacity programs for vulnerable populations during the U.S. energy transition," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    8. Ye, Yuxiang & Koch, Steven F., 2021. "Measuring energy poverty in South Africa based on household required energy consumption," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    9. Best, Rohan & Marrone, Mauricio & Linnenluecke, Martina, 2023. "Meta-analysis of the role of equity dimensions in household solar panel adoption," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    10. Best, Rohan & Hammerle, Mara & Mukhopadhaya, Pundarik & Silber, Jacques, 2021. "Targeting household energy assistance," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    11. Turek-Hankins, Lynée L. & Schueler, Vince & Hino, Miyuki & Mach, Katharine J., 2026. "Weatherization reduces needs for energy bill assistance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    12. Bagnoli, Lisa & Bertoméu-Sánchez, Salvador, 2022. "How effective has the electricity social rate been in reducing energy poverty in Spain?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    13. Best, Rohan, 2022. "Energy inequity variation across contexts," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    14. Siyou Xia & Yu Yang & Xiaoying Qian & Xin Xu, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Interaction and Socioeconomic Determinants of Rural Energy Poverty in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-15, August.
    15. Beiser McGrath, Liam, 2025. "Policy in hard times: how individuals’ energy insecurity shape energy, climate, and social policy preferences," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 128882, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    16. Croon, T.M. & Hoekstra, J.S.C.M. & Elsinga, M.G. & Dalla Longa, F. & Mulder, P., 2023. "Beyond headcount statistics: Exploring the utility of energy poverty gap indices in policy design," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    17. Palma, Pedro & Barrella, Roberto & Gouveia, João Pedro & Romero, José Carlos, 2024. "Comparative analysis of energy poverty definition and measurement in Portugal and Spain," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    18. Baik, Sosung & Hines, Jeffrey F. & Sim, Jaeung, 2023. "Racial disparities in the energy burden beyond socio-economic inequality," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(PA).
    19. Beiser-McGrath, Liam F., 2025. "Policy in hard times: How individuals’ energy insecurity shape energy, climate, and social policy preferences," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    20. Ma, Cong & Cheok, Mui Yee, 2022. "The impact of financing role and organizational culture in small and medium enterprises: Developing business strategies for economic recovery," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 26-38.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:97:y:2025:i:c:s0957178725001742. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/utilities-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.