IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/juipol/v95y2025ics0957178725000529.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Locating large-scale energy storage: spillover effects, carbon emissions, and balancing costs across Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Savelli, Iacopo
  • Howey, David
  • Morstyn, Thomas

Abstract

Reaching net zero requires substantial large-scale energy storage systems (LESS) deployment. This strategy poses key challenges, including understanding how different LESS technologies compare in terms of both economic benefits and environmental impact, as well as analysing the complex interactions within and between markets when storage is deployed. To help shed light on these aspects, we investigate how LESS location, rated power, duration, and technology can affect welfare and carbon emissions in the Italian electricity system by modelling the day-ahead and the ancillary services markets. We considered lithium-ion batteries, pumped-storage hydro, and vanadium redox flow batteries. The results show that deploying LESS is always beneficial in the day-ahead market, but ancillary services costs can increase due to spillover effects because these markets run sequentially. Lithium-ion is the technology that yields the best social welfare increase. Location, rated power, and duration significantly impact carbon emissions, with changes ranging from −260 kgCO2 to 190 kgCO2 per MWh traded. These results suggest that LESS can help increase welfare and induce unintended consequences, such as spillovers across markets with a mixed effect on emissions.

Suggested Citation

  • Savelli, Iacopo & Howey, David & Morstyn, Thomas, 2025. "Locating large-scale energy storage: spillover effects, carbon emissions, and balancing costs across Italy," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:95:y:2025:i:c:s0957178725000529
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2025.101937
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725000529
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jup.2025.101937?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:95:y:2025:i:c:s0957178725000529. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/utilities-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.