IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/juipol/v6y1997i1p9-19.html

Equity and efficiency of unit commitment in competitive electricity markets

Author

Listed:
  • Johnson, Raymond B.
  • Oren, Shmuel S.
  • Svoboda, Alva J.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Johnson, Raymond B. & Oren, Shmuel S. & Svoboda, Alva J., 1997. "Equity and efficiency of unit commitment in competitive electricity markets," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 9-19, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:6:y:1997:i:1:p:9-19
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957-1787(96)00009-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oren, Shmuel S. & Spiller, Pablo T. & Varaiya, Pravin & Wu, Felix, 1995. "Nodal prices and transmission rights: A critical appraisal," The Electricity Journal, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 24-35, April.
    2. Ruff, Larry E., 1994. "Stop wheeling and start dealing: Resolving the transmission dilemma," The Electricity Journal, Elsevier, vol. 7(5), pages 24-43, June.
    3. Hogan, William W., 1995. "A wholesale pool spot market must be administered by the independent system operator: Avoiding the separation fallacy," The Electricity Journal, Elsevier, vol. 8(10), pages 26-37, December.
    4. Lucas, Nigel & Taylor, Peter, 1994. "Structural deficiencies in electricity pricing in the pool," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 72-76, January.
    5. repec:aen:journl:1995v16-03-a02 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. John A. Muckstadt & Sherri A. Koenig, 1977. "An Application of Lagrangian Relaxation to Scheduling in Power-Generation Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 387-403, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liu, Yanchao & Holzer, Jesse T. & Ferris, Michael C., 2015. "Extending the bidding format to promote demand response," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 82-92.
    2. Sioshansi, Ramteen & Oren, Shmuel & O'Neill, Richard, 2010. "Three-part auctions versus self-commitment in day-ahead electricity markets," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 165-173, December.
    3. Jiang, Yuzhou & Sioshansi, Ramteen, 2024. "A computationally efficient approach to optimizing offers in centrally committed electricity markets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(1), pages 25-42.
    4. Wang, Yi & Yang, Zhifang & Yu, Juan & Liu, Sixu, 2023. "Pricing in non-convex electricity markets with flexible trade-off of pricing properties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    5. Eldridge, B. & O’Neill, R. & Hobbs, B., 2018. "Pricing in Day-Ahead Electricity Markets with Near-Optimal Unit Commitment," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1872, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    6. Sioshansi, Ramteen & Miller, Jacob, 2011. "Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles can be clean and economical in dirty power systems," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(10), pages 6151-6161, October.
    7. Ramteen Sioshansi & Emma Nicholson, 2011. "Towards equilibrium offers in unit commitment auctions with nonconvex costs," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 41-61, August.
    8. Chen, Haitao & Zhang, Bin & Wang, Zhaohua, 2022. "Hidden inequality in household electricity consumption: Measurement and determinants based on large-scale smart meter data," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    9. Vadim Borokhov, 2022. "Utilizing the redundant constraints for the uplift payment elimination," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 1377-1402, April.
    10. Jens Hönen & Johann L. Hurink & Bert Zwart, 2023. "A classification scheme for local energy trading," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 45(1), pages 85-118, March.
    11. repec:aen:journl:ej33-4-05 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Sven de Vries & Rakesh V. Vohra, 2003. "Combinatorial Auctions: A Survey," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 284-309, August.
    13. Haugen, Mari & Blaisdell-Pijuan, Paris L. & Botterud, Audun & Levin, Todd & Zhou, Zhi & Belsnes, Michael & Korpås, Magnus & Somani, Abhishek, 2024. "Power market models for the clean energy transition: State of the art and future research needs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 357(C).
    14. Yang, Yuanchao & Wang, Jianhui & Guan, Xiaohong & Zhai, Qiaozhu, 2012. "Subhourly unit commitment with feasible energy delivery constraints," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 245-252.
    15. Sven de Vries & Rakesh Vohra, 2000. "Combinatorial Auctions: A Survey," Discussion Papers 1296, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
    16. Sioshansi, Ramteen, 2014. "Pricing in centrally committed electricity markets," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 143-145.
    17. Gokturk Poyrazoglu & HyungSeon Oh, 2019. "Co-optimization of Transmission Maintenance Scheduling and Production Cost Minimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-18, July.
    18. O'Neill, Richard P. & Sotkiewicz, Paul M. & Hobbs, Benjamin F. & Rothkopf, Michael H. & Stewart, William R., 2005. "Efficient market-clearing prices in markets with nonconvexities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(1), pages 269-285, July.
    19. Rajnish Kamat & Shmuel Oren, 2004. "Two-settlement Systems for Electricity Markets under Network Uncertainty and Market Power," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 5-37, January.
    20. Fischer, Ronald & Serra, Pablo, 2003. "Energy prices in the presence of plant indivisibilities," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 303-314, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kumkar, Lars, 1996. "Wettbewerb im Stromsektor der USA II: Re-Regulierung der Einzelhandelsebene im Bundesstaat Kalifornien," Kiel Working Papers 739, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    2. repec:aen:journl:ej33-4-05 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Richard O’Neill & Emily Fisher & Benjamin Hobbs & Ross Baldick, 2008. "Towards a complete real-time electricity market design," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 220-250, December.
    4. Camelo, Sergio & Papavasiliou, Anthony & de Castro, Luciano & Riascos, Álvaro & Oren, Shmuel, 2018. "A structural model to evaluate the transition from self-commitment to centralized unit commitment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 560-572.
    5. João Lizardo de Araújo, 2001. "A questão do investimento no Setor Elétrico Brasileiro: reforma e crise [The investment in the Brazilian power sector: reform and crisis]," Nova Economia, Economics Department, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Brazil), vol. 11(1), pages 77-96, July.
    6. Jaccard, Mark, 1995. "Oscillating currents : The changing rationale for government intervention in the electricity industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 23(7), pages 579-592, July.
    7. Jinyeong Lee & Kyungcheol Shin & Young-Min Wi, 2024. "Decentralized Operations of Industrial Complex Microgrids Considering Corporate Power Purchase Agreements for Renewable Energy 100% Initiatives in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-23, June.
    8. Paul Joskow & Jean Tirole, 2005. "Merchant Transmission Investment," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(2), pages 233-264, June.
    9. Brunekreeft, Gert, 2004. "Market-based investment in electricity transmission networks: controllable flow," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 269-281, December.
    10. Ramteen Sioshansi & Emma Nicholson, 2011. "Towards equilibrium offers in unit commitment auctions with nonconvex costs," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 41-61, August.
    11. Jacqueline Boucher & Yves Smeers, 2001. "Alternative Models of Restructured Electricity Systems, Part 1: No Market Power," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(6), pages 821-838, December.
    12. Benjamin F. Hobbs & Yuandong Ji, 1999. "Stochastic Programming-Based Bounding of Expected Production Costs for Multiarea Electric Power System," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(6), pages 836-848, December.
    13. Dijk, Justin & Willems, Bert, 2011. "The effect of counter-trading on competition in electricity markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 1764-1773, March.
    14. Joskow, Paul L & Tirole, Jean, 1999. "Transmission Rights and Market Power on Electric Power Networks I: Financial Rights," CEPR Discussion Papers 2093, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    15. Brunekreeft, G., 2003. "Market-based Investment in Electricity Transmission Networks: Controllable Flow," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 0340, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    16. Tosatto, Andrea & Beseler, Xavier Martínez & Østergaard, Jacob & Pinson, Pierre & Chatzivasileiadis, Spyros, 2022. "North Sea Energy Islands: Impact on national markets and grids," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    17. Ramteen Sioshansif & Ashlin Tignor, 2012. "Do Centrally Committed Electricity Markets Provide Useful Price Signals?," The Energy Journal, , vol. 33(4), pages 96-118, October.
    18. Payal Mitra & Soumendu Sarkar & Tarun Mehta & Atul Kumar, 2022. "Unit Commitment in a Federalized Power Market: A Mixed Integer Programming Approach," Working papers 323, Centre for Development Economics, Delhi School of Economics.
    19. Fernando Fuentes & Pablo Serra, 2022. "Chilean Electric Transmission Regulation: From a Merchant Approach to Central Planning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-15, June.
    20. Dong, Jizhe & Li, Yuanhan & Zuo, Shi & Wu, Xiaomei & Zhang, Zuyao & Du, Jiang, 2023. "An intraperiod arbitrary ramping-rate changing model in unit commitment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    21. BOUCHER, Jacqueline & SMEERS, Yves, 1999. "Alternative models of restructured electricity systems. Part 1: no market power," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 1999050, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:6:y:1997:i:1:p:9-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/utilities-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.