IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joreco/v54y2020ics0969698919307441.html

The “timber box†effect for premium wines

Author

Listed:
  • Sung, Billy
  • Crawford, Robert
  • Teah, Min
  • Stankovic, Michelle
  • Phau, Ian

Abstract

The present research aimed to examine the effectiveness of using luxurious external packaging boxes to improve customer perceptions towards premium wine. Consumers viewed images of wine presented in four types of packaging: (1) no box; (2) a plain wooden box; (3) a wooden box with explanatory text; and (4) a wooden box with both explanatory text and a transparent window; and completed a survey measuring product attitude, willingness to pay, perceived luxury, and perceived risk associated with the product. Results indicated all box types resulted in higher willingness to pay, and that the explanatory and transparent boxes were able to elicit significantly higher product attitudes than the plain box or no box at all. The positive effects of the transparent and explanatory boxes were fully mediated, or explained, by perceived luxury. Furthermore, the negative effects underlying the plain box conditions were partially mediated by perceived risk. The present study was the first to empirically investigate the psychological mechanisms responsible for the influence of packaging, and to examine how perceived product luxury and perceived risk underlie these effects. Managerial implications are discussed, and recommendations are provided for retailers.

Suggested Citation

  • Sung, Billy & Crawford, Robert & Teah, Min & Stankovic, Michelle & Phau, Ian, 2020. "The “timber box†effect for premium wines," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:54:y:2020:i:c:s0969698919307441
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102034
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698919307441
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102034?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Quintal, Vanessa Ann & Lee, Julie Anne & Soutar, Geoffrey N., 2010. "Risk, uncertainty and the theory of planned behavior: A tourism example," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 797-805.
    2. Paolacci, Gabriele & Chandler, Jesse & Ipeirotis, Panagiotis G., 2010. "Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk," Judgment and Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(5), pages 411-419, August.
    3. Muthukrishnan, A V & Ramaswami, S, 1999. "Contextual Effects on the Revision of Evaluative Judgments: An Extension of the Omission-Detection Framework," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 26(1), pages 70-84, June.
    4. Lick, Erhard & König, Bettina & Kpossa, Monyédodo Régis & Buller, Violetta, 2017. "Sensory expectations generated by colours of red wine labels," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 146-158.
    5. Verena Huettl & Heribert Gierl, 2012. "Visual art in advertising: The effects of utilitarian vs. hedonic product positioning and price information," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 893-904, September.
    6. Edward Oczkowski, 1994. "A Hedonic Price Function For Australian Premium Table Wine," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 38(1), pages 93-110, April.
    7. Smith, Scott M. & Roster, Catherine A. & Golden, Linda L. & Albaum, Gerald S., 2016. "A multi-group analysis of online survey respondent data quality: Comparing a regular USA consumer panel to MTurk samples," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 3139-3148.
    8. Manon Favier & Franck Celhay & Gaëlle Pantin-Sohier, 2019. "Is less more or a bore? Package design simplicity and brand perception: an application to Champagne," Post-Print hal-01963218, HAL.
    9. Gabriele Paolacci & Jesse Chandler & Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis, 2010. "Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 5(5), pages 411-419, August.
    10. Franziska Voelckner, 2006. "An empirical comparison of methods for measuring consumers’ willingness to pay," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 137-149, April.
    11. Favier, Manon & Celhay, Franck & Pantin-Sohier, Gaëlle, 2019. "Is less more or a bore? Package design simplicity and brand perception: an application to Champagne," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 11-20.
    12. Machiels, Casparus J.A. & Orth, Ulrich R., 2017. "Verticality in product labels and shelves as a metaphorical cue to quality," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 195-203.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jaud, David A. & Melnyk, Valentyna, 2020. "The effect of text-only versus text-and-image wine labels on liking, taste and purchase intentions. The mediating role of affective fluency," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    2. Pelet, Jean-Éric & Durrieu, François & Lick, Erhard, 2020. "Label design of wines sold online: Effects of perceived authenticity on purchase intentions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    3. Orlowski, Marissa & Lefebvre, Sarah & Back, Robin M., 2022. "Thinking outside the bottle: Effects of alternative wine packaging," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    4. Orazi, Davide C. & Johnston, Allen C., 2020. "Running field experiments using Facebook split test," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 189-198.
    5. Ouidade Sabri & Van Doan Hai & Faten Malek & Hager Bachouche, 2019. "When Is Transparent Packaging Beneficial?," Working Papers 2019-006, Department of Research, Ipag Business School.
    6. Ina Garnefeld & Andreas Eggert & Markus Husemann-Kopetzky & Eva Böhm, 2019. "Exploring the link between payment schemes and customer fraud: a mental accounting perspective," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 595-616, July.
    7. Arndt, Aaron D. & Ford, John B. & Babin, Barry J. & Luong, Vinh, 2022. "Collecting samples from online services: How to use screeners to improve data quality," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 117-133.
    8. Kostyk, Alena & Zhou, Wenkai & Hyman, Michael R., 2019. "Using surveytainment to counter declining survey data quality," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 211-219.
    9. Tian, Zhouyuan & Huang, Chia-Hsing, 2025. "Effects of color-typeface congruence on product evaluation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    10. Pleyers, Gordy, 2021. "Shape congruence in product design: Impacts on automatically activated attitudes," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    11. Ma, Jianan & Li, Fangxuan (Sam), 2023. "Does ‘chicken soup for the soul’ on the product packaging work? The mediating role of perceived warmth and self-brand connection," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    12. Yamada, Katsunori & Sato, Masayuki, 2013. "Another avenue for anatomy of income comparisons: Evidence from hypothetical choice experiments," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 35-57.
    13. Sweldens, Steven & Puntoni, Stefano & Paolacci, Gabriele & Vissers, Maarten, 2014. "The bias in the bias: Comparative optimism as a function of event social undesirability," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 229-244.
    14. S. Venus Jin & Aziz Muqaddam, 2019. "Product placement 2.0: “Do Brands Need Influencers, or Do Influencers Need Brands?”," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(5), pages 522-537, September.
    15. Hsu, Dan K. & Burmeister-Lamp, Katrin & Simmons, Sharon A. & Foo, Maw-Der & Hong, Michelle C. & Pipes, Jesse D., 2019. "“I know I can, but I don't fit”: Perceived fit, self-efficacy, and entrepreneurial intention," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 311-326.
    16. Lutz, Christoph & Newlands, Gemma, 2018. "Consumer segmentation within the sharing economy: The case of Airbnb," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 187-196.
    17. Mariconda, Simone & Lurati, Francesco, 2015. "Does familiarity breed stability? The role of familiarity in moderating the effects of new information on reputation judgments," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(5), pages 957-964.
    18. Gandullia, Luca & Lezzi, Emanuela, 2018. "The price elasticity of charitable giving: New experimental evidence," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 88-91.
    19. Tobias Schlager & Ashley V. Whillans, 2022. "People underestimate the probability of contracting the coronavirus from friends," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, December.
    20. Charness, Gary & Gneezy, Uri & Kuhn, Michael A., 2013. "Experimental methods: Extra-laboratory experiments-extending the reach of experimental economics," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 93-100.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:54:y:2020:i:c:s0969698919307441. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing-and-consumer-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.