IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joreco/v44y2018icp161-169.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How convenient is it? Delivering online shopping convenience to enhance customer satisfaction and encourage e-WOM

Author

Listed:
  • Duarte, Paulo
  • Costa e Silva, Susana
  • Ferreira, Margarida Bernardo

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to identify which dimensions of online convenience affect consumers’ intention of using online shopping and explore a conceptual model to measuring consumer perceptions of online shopping convenience in order to surpass the shortcomings of previous studies that did not examine the consequences of convenience shopping experience. A sample of 250 Portuguese young individuals participate in the empirical study. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and a covariance-based Structural Equation Model (CB-SEM) were used to validate the measurement model and to test the relationships in the model. The results reveal that Possession, Transaction, and Evaluation are the dimensions with more influence in online shopping convenience. The outcomes of this study extend previous works on online convenience and help to understand which factors drive online satisfaction and enhance behavioral intentions and e-WOM. Contributions to the body of knowledge and the implications for e-commerce retailers are presented. In face of the findings, retailers should be conscious that customer expectations of online convenience have increased as a natural response to the service innovations introduced by website managers and marketers. Therefore, frequent monitoring of consumers’ perceptions and expectations about online convenience is a prerequisite for achieving continuous improvement in rendering highly convenient online service.

Suggested Citation

  • Duarte, Paulo & Costa e Silva, Susana & Ferreira, Margarida Bernardo, 2018. "How convenient is it? Delivering online shopping convenience to enhance customer satisfaction and encourage e-WOM," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 161-169.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:44:y:2018:i:c:p:161-169
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.06.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096969891830225X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.06.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mosteller, Jill & Donthu, Naveen & Eroglu, Sevgin, 2014. "The fluent online shopping experience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(11), pages 2486-2493.
    2. Emrich, Oliver & Paul, Michael & Rudolph, Thomas, 2015. "Shopping Benefits of Multichannel Assortment Integration and the Moderating Role of Retailer Type," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 91(2), pages 326-342.
    3. Rohm, Andrew J. & Swaminathan, Vanitha, 2004. "A typology of online shoppers based on shopping motivations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(7), pages 748-757, July.
    4. Quoc Trung Pham & Xuan Phuc Tran & Sanjay Misra & Rytis Maskeliūnas & Robertas Damaševičius, 2018. "Relationship between Convenience, Perceived Value, and Repurchase Intention in Online Shopping in Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, January.
    5. de Kerviler, Gwarlann & Demoulin, Nathalie T.M. & Zidda, Pietro, 2016. "Adoption of in-store mobile payment: Are perceived risk and convenience the only drivers?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 334-344.
    6. Gruen, Thomas W. & Osmonbekov, Talai & Czaplewski, Andrew J., 2006. "eWOM: The impact of customer-to-customer online know-how exchange on customer value and loyalty," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(4), pages 449-456, April.
    7. Hui, Michael K & Thakor, Mrugank V & Gill, Ravi, 1998. "The Effect of Delay Type and Service Stage on Consumers' Reactions to Waiting," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 24(4), pages 469-479, March.
    8. Kollmann, Tobias & Kuckertz, Andreas & Kayser, Ina, 2012. "Cannibalization or synergy? Consumers' channel selection in online–offline multichannel systems," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 186-194.
    9. Mercy Mpinganjira, 2015. "Online Store Service Convenience, Customer Satisfaction and Behavioural Intentions: A Focus on Utilitarian Oriented Shoppers," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 7(1), pages 36-49.
    10. Michael W. Browne & Robert Cudeck, 1992. "Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 21(2), pages 230-258, November.
    11. Sanjit Kumar Roy & Walfried M. Lassar & Vaibhav Shekhar, 2016. "Convenience and satisfaction: mediation of fairness and quality," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(5-6), pages 239-260, April.
    12. Pappas, Ilias O. & Kourouthanassis, Panos E. & Giannakos, Michail N. & Chrissikopoulos, Vassilios, 2016. "Explaining online shopping behavior with fsQCA: The role of cognitive and affective perceptions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 794-803.
    13. Gwarlann de Kerviler & Nathalie Demoulin & Pietro Zidda, 2016. "Adoption of in-store mobile payment: Are perceived risk and convenience the only drivers?," Post-Print hal-01526066, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Munshi, M.Faris Uddin & Hussain, Hammad & Ahmed, Muneeb & Idress, Amir, 2020. "Measuring overall convenience of consumers on online shopping and their behavioral intention," MPRA Paper 104588, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Shankar, Amit & Rishi, Bikramjit, 2020. "Convenience matter in mobile banking adoption intention?," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 273-285.
    3. Anindita Chakraborty, 2024. "Evaluating Young Consumers’ Perception of Online Shopping Convenience," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 32(1), pages 74-86.
    4. Jebarajakirthy, Charles & Shankar, Amit, 2021. "Impact of online convenience on mobile banking adoption intention: A moderated mediation approach," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    5. Swapan Kumar Saha & Guijun Zhuang & Sihan Li, 2020. "Will Consumers Pay More for Efficient Delivery? An Empirical Study of What Affects E-Customers’ Satisfaction and Willingness to Pay on Online Shopping in Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22, February.
    6. Swapan Kumar Saha & Paulo Duarte & Susana C. Silva & Guijun Zhuang, 2021. "Supporting sustainability by promoting online purchase through enhancement of online convenience," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 7251-7272, May.
    7. Uzir, Md Uzir Hossain & Al Halbusi, Hussam & Lim, Rodney & Jerin, Ishraq & Abdul Hamid, Abu Bakar & Ramayah, Thurasamy & Haque, Ahasanul, 2021. "Applied Artificial Intelligence and user satisfaction: Smartwatch usage for healthcare in Bangladesh during COVID-19," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    8. Neslin, Scott A., 2022. "The omnichannel continuum: Integrating online and offline channels along the customer journey," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 111-132.
    9. Park, JungKun & Ahn, Jiseon & Thavisay, Toulany & Ren, Tianbao, 2019. "Examining the role of anxiety and social influence in multi-benefits of mobile payment service," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 140-149.
    10. Song, Lianlian & Hu, Baixue & Mou, Jian, 2021. "Investigating consumer binge-watching behavior: A valence framework perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    11. Sohn, Stefanie, 2017. "A contextual perspective on consumers' perceived usefulness: The case of mobile online shopping," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 22-33.
    12. Abhipsa Pal & Tejaswini Herath & Rahul De’ & H. Raghav Rao, 2021. "Is the Convenience Worth the Risk? An Investigation of Mobile Payment Usage," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 941-961, August.
    13. Meena, Rahul & Sarabhai, Samar, 2023. "Extrinsic and intrinsic motivators for usage continuance of hedonic mobile apps," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    14. Mohammad Ali Yousef Yamin & Omima Abdalla Abass Abdalatif, 2024. "Examining consumer behavior towards adoption of quick response code mobile payment systems: transforming mobile payment in the fintech industry," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    15. Matemba, Elizabeth D. & Li, Guoxin, 2018. "Consumers' willingness to adopt and use WeChat wallet: An empirical study in South Africa," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 55-68.
    16. Wagner, Gerhard & Schramm-Klein, Hanna & Steinmann, Sascha, 2017. "Consumers' attitudes and intentions toward Internet-enabled TV shopping," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 278-286.
    17. Yuyang Zhao & Fernando Bacao, 2021. "How Does Gender Moderate Customer Intention of Shopping via Live-Streaming Apps during the COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown Period?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-24, December.
    18. Acquila-Natale, Emiliano & Iglesias-Pradas, Santiago, 2021. "A matter of value? Predicting channel preference and multichannel behaviors in retail," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    19. Sandipan S. Sen & Aliosha Alexandrov & Subhash Jha & William C. McDowell & Emin Babakus, 2023. "Convenient = competitive? How Brick-And-Mortar Retailers can cope with Online Competition," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 1615-1643, July.
    20. Hu, Bo & Liu, Yu-li & Yan, Wenjia, 2021. "Should I scan my face? The influence of perceived value and trust on Chinese users' intention to use facial recognition payment," 23rd ITS Biennial Conference, Online Conference / Gothenburg 2021. Digital societies and industrial transformations: Policies, markets, and technologies in a post-Covid world 238028, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:44:y:2018:i:c:p:161-169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing-and-consumer-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.