IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jfpoli/v109y2022ics0306919222000379.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of sociodemographic and lifestyle factors on taxed sugar-sweetened beverage consumption in Thailand

Author

Listed:
  • Phulkerd, Sirinya
  • Thongcharoenchupong, Natjera
  • Chamratrithirong, Aphichat
  • Pattaravanich, Umaporn
  • Sacks, Gary
  • Prasertsom, Piyada

Abstract

Globally, the factors influencing sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption have been extensively studied in many countries. However, there is no research investigating these factors at the population level. This study analyzed the major factors influencing taxed SSB consumption in Thailand. The Thai SSB tax applies to energy drinks (ED), carbonated drinks (CD) and non-100% fruit juice drinks (FD), and came into effect in 2017. This study used data from the second wave of the 'Longitudinal Monitoring Survey of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption' survey conducted in Thailand in 2019. A total of 4,736 Thai residents aged 15 years or older from four geographic regions and Bangkok in Thailand participated in the study. Data on self-reported frequency and quantity of consumption of taxed SSB were collected using semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire. The data also include sociodemographic characteristics, lifestyle behaviors (physical activity, smoking, and alcohol drinking), current health condition, and knowledge of sugar recommendations. Binary and multinomial logistic regression and generalized linear model analyses were conducted. CD was the most consumed taxed SSB (34.2%) among the sample, followed by FD and ED, respectively. The findings suggest that certain sociodemographic characteristics (male, residing in Bangkok or Central region, lower educational attainment), physical inactivity, and smoking were associated with a higher level of SSB consumption. Consumption was lower for every year increase in age. We also observed a statistically-significant association between lack of knowledge of recommended limit on sugar intake and higher level of CD consumption. In order to further reduce SSB consumption in Thailand, more comprehensive, multifaceted policies and strategies are needed to complement the existing SSB taxation policy in Thailand, with a particular focus on addressing particular sociodemographic groups and other health-related behaviors.

Suggested Citation

  • Phulkerd, Sirinya & Thongcharoenchupong, Natjera & Chamratrithirong, Aphichat & Pattaravanich, Umaporn & Sacks, Gary & Prasertsom, Piyada, 2022. "Influence of sociodemographic and lifestyle factors on taxed sugar-sweetened beverage consumption in Thailand," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:109:y:2022:i:c:s0306919222000379
    DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2022.102256
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919222000379
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.foodpol.2022.102256?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jaana M. Kinnunen & Hanna Ollila & Jaana Minkkinen & Pirjo L. Lindfors & Arja H. Rimpelä, 2018. "A Longitudinal Study of Predictors for Adolescent Electronic Cigarette Experimentation and Comparison with Conventional Smoking," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Armfield, J.M. & Spencer, A.J. & Roberts-Thomson, K.F. & Plastow, K., 2013. "Water fluoridation and the association of sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and dental caries in Australian children," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 103(3), pages 494-500.
    3. Basu, S. & McKee, M. & Galea, G. & Stuckler, D., 2013. "Relationship of soft drink consumption to global overweight, obesity, and diabetes: A cross-national analysis of 75 countries," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 103(11), pages 2071-2077.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mendez Lopez, Ana & Loopstra, Rachel & McKee, Martin & Stuckler, David, 2017. "Is trade liberalisation a vector for the spread of sugar-sweetened beverages? A cross-national longitudinal analysis of 44 low- and middle-income countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 21-27.
    2. Kirsti Iivonen, 2018. "Defensive Responses to Strategic Sustainability Paradoxes: Have Your Coke and Drink It Too!," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(2), pages 309-327, March.
    3. Yekaterina Chzhen & Irene Moor & William Pickett & Emilia Toczydlowska & Gonneke Stevens & UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, 2016. "Family Affluence and Inequality in Adolescent Health and Life Satisfaction: Evidence from the HBSC study 2002-2014," Papers inwopa836, Innocenti Working Papers.
    4. Melissa Neuman & Ichiro Kawachi & Steven Gortmaker & SV Subramanian, 2014. "National Economic Development and Disparities in Body Mass Index: A Cross-Sectional Study of Data from 38 Countries," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-18, June.
    5. Joong Seob Lee & Tae Jun Kim & Sung Kwang Hong & Chanyang Min & Dae Myoung Yoo & Jee Hye Wee & Hyo Geun Choi, 2021. "Impact of Coffee/Green Tea/Soft Drink Consumption on the Risk of Hyperuricemia: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-11, July.
    6. Rosibel Rodríguez-Bolaños & Edna Arillo-Santillán & Inti Barrientos-Gutiérrez & Luis Zavala-Arciniega & Charity A. Ntansah & James F. Thrasher, 2019. "Sex Differences in Becoming a Current Electronic Cigarette User, Current Smoker and Current Dual User of Both Products: A Longitudinal Study among Mexican Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-14, December.
    7. Galea, Gauden & McKee, Martin, 2014. "Public–private partnerships with large corporations: Setting the ground rules for better health," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 138-140.
    8. Goryakin, Yevgeniy & Lobstein, Tim & James, W. Philip T. & Suhrcke, Marc, 2015. "The impact of economic, political and social globalization on overweight and obesity in the 56 low and middle income countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 67-76.
    9. Salma El-Amin & Jaana M. Kinnunen & Arja Rimpelä, 2022. "Adolescents’ Perceptions of Harmfulness of Tobacco and Tobacco-like Products in Finland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-9, January.
    10. Bertrand Dautzenberg & Stéphane Legleye & Michel Underner & Philippe Arvers & Bhavish Pothegadoo & Abdelhalim Bensaidi, 2023. "Systematic Review and Critical Analysis of Longitudinal Studies Assessing Effect of E-Cigarettes on Cigarette Initiation among Adolescent Never-Smokers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(20), pages 1-20, October.
    11. Fabrizio Ferretti & Michele Mariani & Elena Sarti, 2022. "Does the Prevalence of Obesity Affect the Demand for Soft Drinks? Evidence from Cross-Country Panel Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-12, January.
    12. Wada, Roy & Han, Euna & Powell, Lisa M., 2015. "Associations between soda prices and intake: Evidence from 24-h dietary recall data," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 54-60.
    13. David Madden, 2015. "The Poverty Effects Of A ‘Fat‐Tax’ In Ireland," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(1), pages 104-121, January.
    14. Walton Sumner & Konstantinos Farsalinos, 2018. "Lessons and Guidance from the Special Issue on Electronic Cigarette Use and Public Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-9, June.
    15. Erin Hoare & Sarah R. Dash & Garry L. Jennings & Bronwyn A. Kingwell, 2018. "Sex-Specific Associations in Nutrition and Activity-Related Risk Factors for Chronic Disease: Australian Evidence from Childhood to Emerging Adulthood," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-12, January.
    16. Jana Holubcikova & Peter Kolarcik & Andrea Madarasova Geckova & Sijmen Reijneveld & Jitse Dijk, 2015. "The mediating effect of daily nervousness and irritability on the relationship between soft drink consumption and aggressive behaviour among adolescents," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 60(6), pages 699-706, September.
    17. Mercy Manyema & Lennert J Veerman & Lumbwe Chola & Aviva Tugendhaft & Benn Sartorius & Demetre Labadarios & Karen J Hofman, 2014. "The Potential Impact of a 20% Tax on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages on Obesity in South African Adults: A Mathematical Model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-10, August.
    18. Julio C. Arteaga & Daniel Flores & Edgar Luna, 2021. "The effect of a soft drink tax in Mexico: evidence from time series industry data," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 65(2), pages 349-366, April.
    19. Masako Watanabe & Da-Hong Wang & Akihiro Ijichi & Chika Shirai & Yu Zou & Masayuki Kubo & Kei Takemoto & Chie Masatomi & Keiki Ogino, 2014. "The Influence of Lifestyle on the Incidence of Dental Caries among 3-Year-Old Japanese Children," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-12, December.
    20. Goryakin, Yevgeniy & Monsivais, Pablo & Suhrcke, Marc, 2017. "Soft drink prices, sales, body mass index and diabetes: Evidence from a panel of low-, middle- and high-income countries," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 88-94.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:109:y:2022:i:c:s0306919222000379. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/foodpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.