IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v204y2026ics0148296325006848.html

The double-edged sword: polarized stakeholder engagement with corporate sociopolitical activism and its downstream effects on brand performance

Author

Listed:
  • Guha, Mithila
  • Korschun, Daniel
  • Andras, Trina Larsen

Abstract

This study explores how stakeholder reactions to corporate sociopolitical activism (CSA) on ‘X’ influence brand engagement and stock performance. Our research shifts focus from corporate messaging to stakeholder-driven conversations, demonstrating that CSA’s impact extends beyond brand statements and is shaped by public discourse. We analyze both direct replies to brand-authored CSA posts and organic user-initiated discussions, where consumers engage brands using hashtags and mentions. Using data from the 2022 humanitarian crisis in Ukraine, we examine 41,358 targeted user posts referencing 159 publicly traded brands’ CSA engagement. Sentiment analysis and topic modeling of 1,322 brand tweets, 39,578 replies, and stock data reveal that CSA amplifies both shoutouts (praise) and callouts (criticism). While shoutouts provide a brief stock boost before fading, callouts trigger a sustained decline in engagement and stock performance, creating a snowball effect. These findings highlight the trade-offs of CSA and the importance of proactive strategies in managing stakeholder responses.

Suggested Citation

  • Guha, Mithila & Korschun, Daniel & Andras, Trina Larsen, 2026. "The double-edged sword: polarized stakeholder engagement with corporate sociopolitical activism and its downstream effects on brand performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:204:y:2026:i:c:s0148296325006848
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115861
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325006848
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115861?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:204:y:2026:i:c:s0148296325006848. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.