IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v206y2026ics0148296325007362.html

The paradox of being profitable and moral: the role moral authority plays in corporate sociopolitical activism

Author

Listed:
  • Barros, Lucia S.G.
  • Pizzutti, Cristiane
  • de Mello, Nathalia Soares Brum
  • de Almeida, Marcos Inácio Severo
  • Isabella, Giuliana
  • de Paula Baptista, Paulo

Abstract

While stakeholders expect businesses to take sociopolitical stances, the moral authority of such efforts is often questioned. This research examines how consumers perceive companies’ moral authority, its consequences in the context of corporate sociopolitical activism (CSA), and how it can be enhanced. The results of five experiments reveal that companies are perceived to have lower moral authority than nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) due to having more ulterior motives, and the impact of ulterior motives on the perception of moral authority is more pronounced for conservative consumers. Moreover, partnering with an NGO and demonstrating prior cause-aligned initiatives increases a company’s perceived moral authority, affecting reputation, attitudes, product choice, and willingness to pay. However, these effects only hold for liberal stances. These insights contribute to the debate on CSA’s impact on consumer perception and address calls for research on moral authority.

Suggested Citation

  • Barros, Lucia S.G. & Pizzutti, Cristiane & de Mello, Nathalia Soares Brum & de Almeida, Marcos Inácio Severo & Isabella, Giuliana & de Paula Baptista, Paulo, 2026. "The paradox of being profitable and moral: the role moral authority plays in corporate sociopolitical activism," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:206:y:2026:i:c:s0148296325007362
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115913
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325007362
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115913?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Verena Girschik, 2020. "Managing Legitimacy in Business‐Driven Social Change: The Role of Relational Work," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(4), pages 775-804, June.
    2. Russell Haines & Marc Street & Douglas Haines, 2008. "The Influence of Perceived Importance of an Ethical Issue on Moral Judgment, Moral Obligation, and Moral Intent," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 81(2), pages 387-399, August.
    3. Jurgen Meyerhoff, 2006. "Stated willingness to pay as hypothetical behaviour: Can attitudes tell us more?," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(2), pages 209-226.
    4. Mirzaei, Abas & Wilkie, Dean C. & Siuki, Helen, 2022. "Woke brand activism authenticity or the lack of it," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1-12.
    5. Joireman, Jeff & Grégoire, Yany & Devezer, Berna & Tripp, Thomas M., 2013. "When do customers offer firms a “second chance” following a double deviation? The impact of inferred firm motives on customer revenge and reconciliation," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 89(3), pages 315-337.
    6. Baur, Dorothea & Palazzo, Guido, 2011. "The Moral Legitimacy of NGOs as Partners of Corporations," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(4), pages 579-604, October.
    7. Campbell, Margaret C & Kirmani, Amna, 2000. "Consumers' Use of Persuasion Knowledge: The Effects of Accessibility and Cognitive Capacity on Perceptions of an Influence Agent," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 27(1), pages 69-83, June.
    8. Jennifer Aaker & Kathleen D. Vohs & Cassie Mogilner, 2010. "Nonprofits Are Seen as Warm and For-Profits as Competent: Firm Stereotypes Matter," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 37(2), pages 224-237, August.
    9. Mukherjee, Sourjo & Althuizen, Niek, 2020. "Brand activism: Does courting controversy help or hurt a brand?," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 772-788.
    10. Wallach, Karen Anne & Popovich, Deidre, 2023. "When Big Is Less than Small: Why dominant brands lack authenticity in their sustainability initiatives," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    11. Aaker, Jennifer & Vohs, Kathleen D. & Mogilner, Cassie, 2010. "Non-profits Are Seen as Warm and For-Profits as Competent: Firm Stereotypes Matter," Research Papers 2047, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    12. Burnkrant, Robert E & Unnava, H Rao, 1995. "Effects of Self-Referencing on Persuasion," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 22(1), pages 17-26, June.
    13. Sourjo Mukherjee & Niek Althuizen, 2020. "Brand Activism: Does Courting Controversy Help or Hurt a Brand?," Post-Print hal-03095886, HAL.
    14. Rim, Hyejoon & Yang, Sung-Un & Lee, Jaejin, 2016. "Strategic partnerships with nonprofits in corporate social responsibility (CSR): The mediating role of perceived altruism and organizational identification," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3213-3219.
    15. Jung, Jihye & Mittal, Vikas, 2020. "Political Identity and the Consumer Journey: A Research Review," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 55-73.
    16. Ahmad, Fayez & Guzmán, Francisco & Kidwell, Blair, 2022. "Effective messaging strategies to increase brand love for sociopolitical activist brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 609-622.
    17. Saerom Lee & Lisa E Bolton & Karen Page Winterich & Vicki MorwitzEditor & Lauren BlockAssociate Editor, 2017. "To Profit or Not to Profit? The Role of Greed Perceptions in Consumer Support for Social Ventures," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(4), pages 853-876.
    18. Zoe Lee & Amanda Spry & Yuksel Ekinci & Jessica Vredenburg, 2024. "From warmth to warrior: impacts of non-profit brand activism on brand bravery, brand hypocrisy and brand equity," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 31(2), pages 193-211, March.
    19. Laroche, Michel & Kim, Chankon & Zhou, Lianxi, 1996. "Brand familiarity and confidence as determinants of purchase intention: An empirical test in a multiple brand context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 115-120, October.
    20. Hoppner, Jessica J. & Vadakkepatt, Gautham G., 2019. "Examining moral authority in the marketplace: A conceptualization and framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 417-427.
    21. Walsh, Gianfranco & Beatty, Sharon E. & Shiu, Edward M.K., 2009. "The customer-based corporate reputation scale: Replication and short form," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(10), pages 924-930, October.
    22. Ahmad, Fayez & Guzmán, Francisco & Al-Emran, Md, 2024. "Brand activism and the consequence of woke washing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mahmud, Riaj & Guzmán, Francisco, 2025. "The cost of contradiction: exploring consumer negative responses to activist brands’ moral transgressions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    2. Klement Podnar & Urša Golob, 2024. "Brands and activism: ecosystem and paradoxes," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 31(2), pages 95-107, March.
    3. Spry, Amanda & Lee, Zoe & Makkar, Marian & France, Cassandra, 2026. "Care-based corporate sociopolitical activism: identifying dark sides and envisioning an ethical framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    4. Antonella Cammarota & Generoso Branca, 2025. "Generation Z consumers’ perspective: how and why should (not) brands engage in activism?," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2025(1), pages 21-50, March.
    5. Kim, Sumin & He, Hongwei, 2025. "The impact of brand activism on consumer behaviors: Examining the contrasting roles of admiration and anger," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    6. Charlotte Lécuyer & Marine Kergoat & Christine Lambey-Checchin, 2026. "Instrumental or Normative Motives: How Should Brands Implement Their Activism Campaigns?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 203(3), pages 667-685, January.
    7. Lee, Zoe & Faridah Syed Alwi, Sharifah & Gambetti, Rossella, 2024. "The thousand faces of beauty: How credible storytelling unlocks disability representation in inclusive luxury fashion branding," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    8. Virkus, Tjark & Klein, Kristina, 2026. "The role of authenticity and skepticism in consumers’ reactions to brand activism," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    9. Stefanie Wannow & Martin Haupt & Martin Ohlwein, 2024. "Is brand activism an emotional affair? The role of moral emotions in consumer responses to brand activism," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 31(2), pages 168-192, March.
    10. Zaman Malik, Aaminah & Ahmad, Fayez & Guzmán, Francisco, 2025. "Socio-politically silent brands: A double edged sword," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    11. Saracevic, Selma & Schlegelmilch, Bodo B., 2026. "From motivation to outcome: a structured narrative review of the literature on corporate activism," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    12. Theres Rüger & Janek Mücksch & Florian U. Siems, 2025. "Leveraging moral foundations theory in sociopolitical campaigns: an empirical investigation on how brands can persuade university-affiliated consumers with moral reframing," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 32(6), pages 484-509, November.
    13. Federico Mangiò & Giuseppe Pedeliento & Daniela Andreini & Lia Zarantonello, 2024. "How persuasive is woke brand communication on social media? Evidence from a consumer engagement analysis on Facebook," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 31(4), pages 345-381, July.
    14. Guha, Mithila & Korschun, Daniel & Andras, Trina Larsen, 2026. "The double-edged sword: polarized stakeholder engagement with corporate sociopolitical activism and its downstream effects on brand performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    15. Ahmad, Fayez & Guzmán, Francisco & Al-Emran, Md, 2024. "Brand activism and the consequence of woke washing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    16. Pomerance, Justin & Zifla, Ermira, 2025. "Beyond the bottom line: The influence of political ideology on preference for corporate sociopolitical activism," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    17. Weber, T.J. & Joireman, Jeff & Sprott, David E., 2025. "Consumer response to corporate political advocacy: the role of policy attitudes, policy change, and perceived controversy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    18. Paolo Antonetti & Ilaria Baghi, 2023. "Projecting lower competence to boost apology effectiveness: Underlying mechanism and boundary conditions," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 695-715, May.
    19. Guilin Liu & Maggie Wenjing Liu & Qichao Zhu, 2025. "Hmm, the effect of AI conversational fillers on consumer purchase intentions," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 593-605, September.
    20. Mario D’Arco & Vittoria Marino & Riccardo Resciniti, 2024. "Stop business with Russia! Exploring the representation and perceived authenticity of corporate activism in response to Russia-Ukraine war," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2024(1), pages 55-76, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:206:y:2026:i:c:s0148296325007362. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.