IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v196y2025ics0148296325002504.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do conflicts in cooperation matter to open innovation? An empirical study of industrial clusters in China

Author

Listed:
  • Xu, Rui
  • Felzensztein, Christian

Abstract

Open innovation relies on inter-firm cooperation, yet conflict—both constructive and destructive—is an inevitable aspect of collaborative dynamics. While the role of cooperation in fostering open innovation is well-established, the influence of conflict remains underexamined. Grounded in theoretical insights, this study investigates the distinct effects of constructive and destructive conflict on the innovation process within cooperative efforts. Analyzing data from 186 firms in industrial clusters in China, our findings reveal that constructive conflict, despite promoting diverse perspectives, can inadvertently weaken the positive effects of cooperation on open innovation by diverting managerial resources and attention. Conversely, destructive conflict—typically perceived as harmful—unexpectedly amplifies the impact of cooperation on innovation by compelling firms to reassess and reinforce their partnerships. These empirical insights underscore the complex and paradoxical role of conflict in open innovation, demonstrating that both constructive and destructive conflict can shape innovation success through their interaction with cooperation.

Suggested Citation

  • Xu, Rui & Felzensztein, Christian, 2025. "Do conflicts in cooperation matter to open innovation? An empirical study of industrial clusters in China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:196:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325002504
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115427
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325002504
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115427?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:196:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325002504. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.