IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v172y2024ics0148296323007592.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of status threat on preference for cross-domain self-improvement products: The moderation of trade-off beliefs

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Yaming
  • Wang, Xingyuan
  • Chen, Haipeng (Allan)
  • Ouyang, Qiang

Abstract

Negative psychological experiences, such as exposure to a status threat, are an important driver of consumer behavior. While existing literature has overwhelmingly argued that consumers endeavor to cope with a status threat via compensatory consumption (i.e., purchasing status-related or hedonic products), other studies have demonstrated that consumers who perceive the threat as controllable tend to resort to adaptive consumption (i.e., within-domain self-improvement products). The current research proposes that perceived loss of control stemming from a status threat leads to consumers' preference for cross-domain self-improvement products. Further, trade-off beliefs moderate the effect of status threat on perceived loss of control, which in turn predicts preference for cross-domain self-improvement products. These findings contribute to the theorization of status threat and cross-domain self-improvement products and provide significant practical implications for marketers.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Yaming & Wang, Xingyuan & Chen, Haipeng (Allan) & Ouyang, Qiang, 2024. "Effect of status threat on preference for cross-domain self-improvement products: The moderation of trade-off beliefs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:172:y:2024:i:c:s0148296323007592
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114400
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296323007592
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114400?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:172:y:2024:i:c:s0148296323007592. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.