IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v136y2021icp330-342.html

Feeling anxious: The dark side of checkout charity solicitations

Author

Listed:
  • Hepworth, Adam
  • Young Lee, Na
  • Zablah, Alex R.

Abstract

Research and practice alike suggest that checkout charity campaigns are a win–win–win for retailers, customers, and causes. The current investigation offers a complementary perspective on the effects of checkout charity by uncovering evidence of undesirable customer responses triggered by such solicitations. Specifically, across four studies, we find that checkout charity solicitations induce customer anxiety, which in turn reduces their evaluation of the service encounter. In addition, our results reveal that such anxiety decreases during solicitation episodes when customers agree to donate; however, this occurs only when requests are made by frontline employees rather than self-checkout technologies. These results caution managers that checkout charity solicitations may have unintended consequences on customers that result in negative encounter outcomes, particularly in service environments in which the solicitation is technology-mediated.

Suggested Citation

  • Hepworth, Adam & Young Lee, Na & Zablah, Alex R., 2021. "Feeling anxious: The dark side of checkout charity solicitations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 330-342.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:136:y:2021:i:c:p:330-342
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.07.050
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296321005439
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.07.050?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Derek D. Rucker & David Dubois & Adam D. Galinsky, 2011. "Generous Paupers and Stingy Princes: Power Drives Consumer Spending on Self versus Others," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 37(6), pages 1015-1029.
    2. Meuter, Matthew L. & Ostrom, Amy L. & Bitner, Mary Jo & Roundtree, Robert, 2003. "The influence of technology anxiety on consumer use and experiences with self-service technologies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(11), pages 899-906, November.
    3. Robert J. Fisher & Mark Vandenbosch & Kersi D. Antia, 2008. "An Empathy-Helping Perspective on Consumers' Responses to Fund-Raising Appeals," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 35(3), pages 519-531, February.
    4. Savas, Selen, 2016. "Factors affecting donations in U.S. retail stores: A conceptual framework," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 178-185.
    5. Xinshu Zhao & John G. Lynch & Qimei Chen, 2010. "Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 37(2), pages 197-206, August.
    6. Joshua T Beck & Ryan Rahinel & Alexander Bleier & Simona Botti & Darren W Dahl & J Jeffrey Inman, 2020. "Company Worth Keeping: Personal Control and Preferences for Brand Leaders [Measuring Brand Equity across Products and Markets]," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 46(5), pages 871-886.
    7. Mohr, Lois A. & Bitner, Mary Jo, 1995. "The role of employee effort in satisfaction with service transactions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 239-252, March.
    8. Andreoni, James, 1989. "Giving with Impure Altruism: Applications to Charity and Ricardian Equivalence," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 97(6), pages 1447-1458, December.
    9. Obeng, Efua & Nakhata, Chinintorn & Kuo, Hsiao-Ching, 2019. "“Paying it forward: The reciprocal effect of superior service on charity at checkout”," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 250-260.
    10. David Dubois & Derek D. Rucker & Adam D. Galinsky, 2011. "Generous Paupers and Stingy Princes: Power Drives Consumer Spending on Self versus Others," Post-Print hal-00621230, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Benjamin Lawrence & Brett Massimino & Jie J. Zhang, 2024. "Decay and Recovery of CSR Routines in Franchise Organizations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 193(3), pages 589-610, September.
    2. Soumya Singh & Sapna Singh, 2024. "Impulse buying and checkout donation: leveraging reparatory processes of purchase guilt," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 21(1), pages 83-106, March.
    3. Milfeld, Tyler & Packer, Olivia, 2025. "Marketplace power and choice framing: How and when CSR surcharges generate consumer anger," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rudd, Melanie & Aaker, Jennifer & Norton, Michael I., 2013. "Getting the Most out of Giving: Pursuing Concretely-Framed Prosocial Goals Maximizes Happiness," Research Papers 2129, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    2. Mourali, Mehdi & Yang, Zhiyong & Pons, Frank & Hassay, Derek, 2018. "Consumer power and choice deferral: The role of anticipated regret," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 81-99.
    3. Hattula, Johannes D. & Schmitz, Christian & Schmidt, Martin & Reinecke, Sven, 2015. "Is more always better? An investigation into the relationship between marketing influence and managers' market intelligence dissemination," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 179-186.
    4. Na Young Lee & Stephanie M. Noble & Dipayan Biswas, 2018. "Hey big spender! A golden (color) atmospheric effect on tipping behavior," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 317-337, March.
    5. Danielle J Brick & Gràinne M Fitzsimons & Tanya L Chartrand & Gavan J Fitzsimons & Gita JoharEditor & Sharon ShavittAssociate Editor, 2018. "Coke vs. Pepsi: Brand Compatibility, Relationship Power, and Life Satisfaction," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(5), pages 991-1014.
    6. Giovanni Pino & Gianluigi Guido & Rajan Nataraajan, 2017. "Iconic art infusion in luxury retail strategies: Unveiling the potential," Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 136-147, April.
    7. Min, Dongwon & Kim, Ji-Hern, 2013. "Is power powerful? Power, confidence, and goal pursuit," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 265-275.
    8. Carter, Kealy & Jayachandran, Satish & Murdock, Mitchel R., 2021. "Building A Sustainable Shelf: The Role of Firm Sustainability Reputation," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 97(4), pages 507-522.
    9. Xingbo Li & Shalini Sarin Jain & Yiqin Alicia Shen & Shailendra Pratap Jain, 2021. "Power and Message Framing: the Case of Comparative Advertising," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 8(1), pages 41-49, June.
    10. Habiba Ben Ameur & Kaouther Saeid Ben Rached, 2022. "Impact of Consumer Empowerment on Satisfaction in an Online Brand Community: Mediating role of the Online Experience Toward the Brand," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 12(6), pages 44-54, November.
    11. Dhiman, Neeraj & Jamwal, Mohit & Kumar, Ajay, 2023. "Enhancing value in customer journey by considering the (ad)option of artificial intelligence tools," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    12. Hwang, YooHee & Shin, Joongwon & Mattila, Anna S., 2018. "So private, yet so public: The impact of spatial distance, other diners, and power on solo dining experiences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 36-47.
    13. Li Yan & Hean Tat Keh & Xiaoyu Wang, 2021. "Powering Sustainable Consumption: The Roles of Green Consumption Values and Power Distance Belief," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(3), pages 499-516, March.
    14. Alvarez, Claudio & David, Meredith E. & George, Morris, 2023. "Types of Consumer-Brand Relationships: A systematic review and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    15. Söderlund, Magnus & Sagfossen, Sofie, 2017. "The consumer experience: The impact of supplier effort and consumer effort on customer satisfaction," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 219-229.
    16. Wang, Yaming & Wang, Xingyuan & Chen, Haipeng (Allan) & Ouyang, Qiang, 2024. "Effect of status threat on preference for cross-domain self-improvement products: The moderation of trade-off beliefs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    17. Shan, Minghui & Zhu, Zhenzhong & Song, Chunlei & Chen, Haipeng (Allan), 2023. "The effectiveness of advertising appeals: A culturally-derived power perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    18. Neel Das & Lubna Nafees & Unal O. Boya & Anindita Das, 2024. "Is roundup donation request always preferred: a case for checkout charity," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 21(3), pages 645-658, September.
    19. Claudia Toma & Vincent Yzerbyt & Olivier Corneille & Stéphanie Demoulin, 2015. "The power of projection for powerless and powerful people," Working Papers CEB 15-028, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    20. Yoon, Sunyee & Kim, Danny JM & Boichuk, Jeffrey P., 2025. "Preference for animal welfare products: The effect of power and animal anthropomorphism," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:136:y:2021:i:c:p:330-342. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.