IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v142y2022icp899-913.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ethical judgments of sexualized ads featuring Women: The role of identification with feminine archetypes

Author

Listed:
  • de Kerviler, Gwarlann
  • Ardelet, Caroline
  • Slavich, Barbara

Abstract

Women may react differently to sexualized ads featuring women. Notably, while some women may regard a sexual imagery as empowering, others may perceive it as a sign of objectification. Accurate predictions of women’s reactions to sexualized ads remain limited. Four studies, conducted in the United States and France, reveal that identification with feminine archetypes affects ethical judgment of sexualized ads through differences in perceived male dominance. Results show that women with high self-esteem as well as women preferring intense make-up have a less negative ethical judgment towards perceived male dominance. Findings contribute to research by highlighting the importance of the archetypes framework for segmenting an advertising audience and for determining ethical judgment. This research highlights the role played by perceived male dominance, self-esteem and make-up preference in the relationship between identification to archetypes and ethical judgment. Finally, it provides new guidelines to define relevant targets for advertising campaign.

Suggested Citation

  • de Kerviler, Gwarlann & Ardelet, Caroline & Slavich, Barbara, 2022. "Ethical judgments of sexualized ads featuring Women: The role of identification with feminine archetypes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 899-913.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:142:y:2022:i:c:p:899-913
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296321009188
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mulder, Laetitia B. & Aquino, Karl, 2013. "The role of moral identity in the aftermath of dishonesty," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 121(2), pages 219-230.
    2. Javornik, Ana & Marder, Ben & Pizzetti, Marta & Warlop, Luk, 2021. "Augmented self - The effects of virtual face augmentation on consumers' self-concept," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 170-187.
    3. Cozzio, Claudia & Volgger, Michael & Taplin, Ross & Woodside, Arch G., 2020. "Nurturing tourists’ ethical food consumption: Testing the persuasive strengths of alternative messages in a natural hotel setting," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 268-279.
    4. Spears, Nancy & Amos, Clinton, 2014. "Twentieth century female ad images: Cultural interconnections, social learning, and the dialectical logic of advertising," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(4), pages 441-448.
    5. Darren W. Dahl & Jaideep Sengupta & Kathleen D. Vohs, 2009. "Sex in Advertising: Gender Differences and the Role of Relationship Commitment," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 36(2), pages 215-231.
    6. John Sparks & Yue Pan, 2010. "Ethical Judgments in Business Ethics Research: Definition, and Research Agenda," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 91(3), pages 405-418, February.
    7. Sylvie Borau & Jean-François Bonnefon, 2019. "The Imaginary Intrasexual Competition: Advertisements Featuring Provocative Female Models Trigger Women to Engage in Indirect Aggression," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(1), pages 45-63, June.
    8. Das, Gopal & Agarwal, James & Malhotra, Naresh K. & Varshneya, Geetika, 2019. "Does brand experience translate into brand commitment?: A mediated-moderation model of brand passion and perceived brand ethicality," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 479-490.
    9. Peter Mudrack & E. Mason, 2013. "Ethical Judgments: What Do We Know, Where Do We Go?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 115(3), pages 575-597, July.
    10. Ferreira, Marcia Christina & Scaraboto, Daiane, 2016. "“My plastic dreams”: Towards an extended understanding of materiality and the shaping of consumer identities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 191-207.
    11. Ferguson, Shelagh & Brace-Govan, Jan & Martin, Diane M., 2020. "Gender status bias and the marketplace," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 211-221.
    12. Zimand-Sheiner, Dorit & Ryan, Tanya & Kip, Sema Misci & Lahav, Tamar, 2020. "Native advertising credibility perceptions and ethical attitudes: An exploratory study among adolescents in the United States, Turkey and Israel," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 608-619.
    13. Walther, Luciana & Schouten, John W., 2016. "Next stop, Pleasure Town: Identity transformation and women's erotic consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 273-283.
    14. Karanika, Katerina & Hogg, Margaret K., 2016. "Being kind to ourselves: Self-compassion, coping, and consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 760-769.
    15. James Mark Mayer & Plamen Peev, 2017. "Do sexy mouthwash ads leave a bad aftertaste? The interaction of sexual self-schema and brand positioning fit on female-targeted sexual advertising efficacy," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 321-333, June.
    16. Michaelidou, Nina & Micevski, Milena & Cadogan, John W., 2021. "Users’ ethical perceptions of social media research: Conceptualisation and measurement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 684-694.
    17. Clemens Bechter & Giorgio Farinelli & Rolf-Dieter Daniel & Michael Frey, 2016. "Advertising between Archetype and Brand Personality," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-11, June.
    18. Vassiliki Grougiou & George Balabanis & Danae Manika, 2020. "Does Humour Influence Perceptions of the Ethicality of Female-Disparaging Advertising?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 1-16, June.
    19. Brunk, Katja H., 2010. "Exploring origins of ethical company/brand perceptions -- A consumer perspective of corporate ethics," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 255-262, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tripathi, Sanjeev & Bansal, Anjali & Bansal, Amrita, 2022. "Sociocultural changes and portrayal of women in advertisements: A temporal investigation across product categories," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 216-227.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jack Coffin & Christian Eichert & Shona Bettany & Andrew Lindridge & Gillian Oakenfull & Jacob Östberg & Lisa Peñaloza & Diego Rinallo & David Rowe & Jannsen Santana & Luca M. Visconti & Luciana Walth, 2022. "Crossing wires : Short-circuiting marketing theory," Post-Print hal-04325542, HAL.
    2. Gwarlann Kerviler & Nico Heuvinck & Elodie Gentina, 2022. "“Make an Effort and Show Me the Love!” Effects of Indexical and Iconic Authenticity on Perceived Brand Ethicality," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(1), pages 89-110, August.
    3. Loréa Baïada-Hirèche & Ghislaine Garmilis, 2016. "Accounting Professionals’ Ethical Judgment and the Institutional Disciplinary Context: A French–US Comparison," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(4), pages 639-659, December.
    4. Loréa Baïada-Hirèche & Lionel Garreau, 2014. "Exploring the dynamics of ethical judgment : the sensemaking-based evolution model," Post-Print halshs-01009708, HAL.
    5. Benjamin Boeuf & Jessica Darveau, 2019. "An Ethical Perspective on Necro-Advertising: The Moderating Effect of Brand Equity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(4), pages 1077-1099, April.
    6. Jose Ribamar Siqueira Junior & Enrique Horst & German Molina & Laura H. Gunn & Felipe Reinoso-Carvalho & Burcu Sezen & Nathalie Peña-García, 2023. "Branding in the eye of the storm: the impact of brand ethical behavior on brand commitment during the COVID-19 crisis in a South American country," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 95-115, March.
    7. Loréa Baïada-Hirèche & Lionel Garreau, 2014. "Exploring the dynamics of ethical judgment : the sensemaking-based evolution model," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) halshs-01009708, HAL.
    8. Tripathi, Sanjeev & Bansal, Anjali & Bansal, Amrita, 2022. "Sociocultural changes and portrayal of women in advertisements: A temporal investigation across product categories," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 216-227.
    9. Andaç T. Arıkan, 2020. "Opportunism is in the Eye of the Beholder: Antecedents of Subjective Opportunism Judgments," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(3), pages 573-589, January.
    10. Naeun L. Kim & Gwia Kim & Lori Rothenberg, 2020. "Is Honesty the Best Policy? Examining the Role of Price and Production Transparency in Fashion Marketing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-18, August.
    11. Guang-Xin Xie & Hua Chang & Tracy Rank-Christman, 2022. "Contesting Dishonesty: When and Why Perspective-Taking Decreases Ethical Tolerance of Marketplace Deception," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 117-133, January.
    12. Katja H. Brunk & Cara Boer, 2020. "How do Consumers Reconcile Positive and Negative CSR-Related Information to Form an Ethical Brand Perception? A Mixed Method Inquiry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(2), pages 443-458, January.
    13. Cherrier, Helene & Türe, Meltem, 2020. "Value dynamics in ordinary object disposal," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 221-228.
    14. Tarcia Camily Cavalcante Quezado & Nuno Fortes & William Quezado Figueiredo Cavalcante, 2022. "The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Ethics on Brand Fidelity: The Importance of Brand Love and Brand Attitude," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, March.
    15. Elena Kossmann & Mónica Gómez-Suárez, 2018. "Decision-making processes for purchases of ethical products: gaps between academic research and needs of marketing practitioners," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 15(3), pages 353-370, September.
    16. David Amani & Ismail Juma Ismail, 2022. "Investigating the predicting role of COVID-19 preventive measures on building brand legitimacy in the hospitality industry in Tanzania: mediation effect of perceived brand ethicality," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, December.
    17. Jatinder Singh & Oriol Iglesias & Joan Batista-Foguet, 2012. "Does Having an Ethical Brand Matter? The Influence of Consumer Perceived Ethicality on Trust, Affect and Loyalty," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 111(4), pages 541-549, December.
    18. Alfiero, Simona & Battisti, Enrico & Ηadjielias, Elias, 2022. "Black box technology, usage-based insurance, and prediction of purchase behavior: Evidence from the auto insurance sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    19. Rasim Serdar Kurdoglu & Nüfer Yasin Ateş, 2022. "Arguing to Defeat: Eristic Argumentation and Irrationality in Resolving Moral Concerns," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(3), pages 519-535, January.
    20. Neubert, Mitchell J. & Montañez, George D., 2020. "Virtue as a framework for the design and use of artificial intelligence," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 195-204.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:142:y:2022:i:c:p:899-913. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.