IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03600339.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Ethical judgments of sexualized ads featuring Women: The role of identification with feminine archetypes

Author

Listed:
  • Gwarlann de Kerviler

    (LEM - Lille économie management - UMR 9221 - UA - Université d'Artois - UCL - Université catholique de Lille - Université de Lille - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Caroline Ardelet
  • Barbara Slavich

    (LEM - Lille économie management - UMR 9221 - UA - Université d'Artois - UCL - Université catholique de Lille - Université de Lille - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Women may react differently to sexualized ads featuring women. Notably, while some women may regard a sexual imagery as empowering, others may perceive it as a sign of objectification. Accurate predictions of women's reactions to sexualized ads remain limited. Four studies, conducted in the United States and France, reveal that identification with feminine archetypes affects ethical judgment of sexualized ads through differences in perceived male dominance. Results show that women with high self-esteem as well as women preferring intense make-up have a less negative ethical judgment towards perceived male dominance. Findings contribute to research by highlighting the importance of the archetypes framework for segmenting an advertising audience and for determining ethical judgment. This research highlights the role played by perceived male dominance, self-esteem and make-up preference in the relationship between identification to archetypes and ethical judgment. Finally, it provides new guidelines to define relevant targets for advertising campaign.

Suggested Citation

  • Gwarlann de Kerviler & Caroline Ardelet & Barbara Slavich, 2022. "Ethical judgments of sexualized ads featuring Women: The role of identification with feminine archetypes," Post-Print hal-03600339, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03600339
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.004
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03600339
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03600339/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mulder, Laetitia B. & Aquino, Karl, 2013. "The role of moral identity in the aftermath of dishonesty," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 121(2), pages 219-230.
    2. Spears, Nancy & Amos, Clinton, 2014. "Twentieth century female ad images: Cultural interconnections, social learning, and the dialectical logic of advertising," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(4), pages 441-448.
    3. John Sparks & Yue Pan, 2010. "Ethical Judgments in Business Ethics Research: Definition, and Research Agenda," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 91(3), pages 405-418, February.
    4. Das, Gopal & Agarwal, James & Malhotra, Naresh K. & Varshneya, Geetika, 2019. "Does brand experience translate into brand commitment?: A mediated-moderation model of brand passion and perceived brand ethicality," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 479-490.
    5. Ferreira, Marcia Christina & Scaraboto, Daiane, 2016. "“My plastic dreams”: Towards an extended understanding of materiality and the shaping of consumer identities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 191-207.
    6. Ferguson, Shelagh & Brace-Govan, Jan & Martin, Diane M., 2020. "Gender status bias and the marketplace," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 211-221.
    7. Walther, Luciana & Schouten, John W., 2016. "Next stop, Pleasure Town: Identity transformation and women's erotic consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 273-283.
    8. Karanika, Katerina & Hogg, Margaret K., 2016. "Being kind to ourselves: Self-compassion, coping, and consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 760-769.
    9. James Mark Mayer & Plamen Peev, 2017. "Do sexy mouthwash ads leave a bad aftertaste? The interaction of sexual self-schema and brand positioning fit on female-targeted sexual advertising efficacy," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 321-333, June.
    10. Gwarlann de Kerviler & Nico Heuvinck & Elodie Gentina, 2021. "“Make an Effort and Show Me the Love!” Effects of Indexical and Iconic Authenticity on Perceived Brand Ethicality," Post-Print hal-03267440, HAL.
    11. Michaelidou, Nina & Micevski, Milena & Cadogan, John W., 2021. "Users’ ethical perceptions of social media research: Conceptualisation and measurement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 684-694.
    12. Vassiliki Grougiou & George Balabanis & Danae Manika, 2020. "Does Humour Influence Perceptions of the Ethicality of Female-Disparaging Advertising?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 1-16, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sylvie Borau, 2025. "Deception, Discrimination, and Objectification: Ethical Issues of Female AI Agents," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 198(1), pages 1-19, April.
    2. Tripathi, Sanjeev & Bansal, Anjali & Bansal, Amrita, 2022. "Sociocultural changes and portrayal of women in advertisements: A temporal investigation across product categories," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 216-227.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Kerviler, Gwarlann & Ardelet, Caroline & Slavich, Barbara, 2022. "Ethical judgments of sexualized ads featuring Women: The role of identification with feminine archetypes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 899-913.
    2. Jack Coffin & Christian Eichert & Shona Bettany & Andrew Lindridge & Gillian Oakenfull & Jacob Östberg & Lisa Peñaloza & Diego Rinallo & David Rowe & Jannsen Santana & Luca M. Visconti & Luciana Walth, 2022. "Crossing wires : Short-circuiting marketing theory," Post-Print hal-04325542, HAL.
    3. Cagla Pinar Utkutug, 2024. "The mediating effect of consumers’ perceived ethicality in the relationship between consumer cynicism/material values and affective commitment," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(3), pages 583-598, September.
    4. Guang-Xin Xie & Hua Chang & Tracy Rank-Christman, 2022. "Contesting Dishonesty: When and Why Perspective-Taking Decreases Ethical Tolerance of Marketplace Deception," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 117-133, January.
    5. Gwarlann Kerviler & Nico Heuvinck & Elodie Gentina, 2022. "“Make an Effort and Show Me the Love!” Effects of Indexical and Iconic Authenticity on Perceived Brand Ethicality," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(1), pages 89-110, August.
    6. Cherrier, Helene & Türe, Meltem, 2020. "Value dynamics in ordinary object disposal," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 221-228.
    7. David Amani & Ismail Juma Ismail, 2022. "Investigating the predicting role of COVID-19 preventive measures on building brand legitimacy in the hospitality industry in Tanzania: mediation effect of perceived brand ethicality," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, December.
    8. Alfiero, Simona & Battisti, Enrico & Ηadjielias, Elias, 2022. "Black box technology, usage-based insurance, and prediction of purchase behavior: Evidence from the auto insurance sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    9. Rasim Serdar Kurdoglu & Nüfer Yasin Ateş, 2022. "Arguing to Defeat: Eristic Argumentation and Irrationality in Resolving Moral Concerns," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(3), pages 519-535, January.
    10. Loréa Baïada-Hirèche & Ghislaine Garmilis, 2016. "Accounting Professionals’ Ethical Judgment and the Institutional Disciplinary Context: A French–US Comparison," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(4), pages 639-659, December.
    11. Loréa Baïada-Hirèche & Jean Pasquero & Jean-François Chanlat, 2011. "Managerial Responsibility as Negotiated Order: A Social Construction Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 101(1), pages 17-31, March.
    12. Xianchun Zhang & Zhu Yao, 2019. "Impact of relational leadership on employees’ unethical pro-organizational behavior: A survey based on tourism companies in four countries," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, December.
    13. Abdelrahman, Omar Khaled & Banister, Emma & Hampson, Daniel Peter, 2020. "Curatorial consumption: Objects’ circulation and transference in the vintage marketplace," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 304-311.
    14. Peter Mudrack & E. Mason, 2013. "Dilemmas, Conspiracies, and Sophie’s Choice: Vignette Themes and Ethical Judgments," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(3), pages 639-653, December.
    15. Sara Amoroso & Simonetta Pattuglia & Imran Khan, 2021. "Do Millennials share similar perceptions of brand experience? A clusterization based on brand experience and other brand-related constructs: the case of Netflix," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 33-43, March.
    16. Chenfeng Yan & Quan Chen & Xinyue Zhou & Xin Dai & Zhilin Yang, 2024. "When the Automated fire Backfires: The Adoption of Algorithm-based HR Decision-making Could Induce Consumer’s Unfavorable Ethicality Inferences of the Company," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 190(4), pages 841-859, April.
    17. George I. Christopoulos & Xiao-Xiao Liu & Ying-yi Hong, 2017. "Toward an Understanding of Dynamic Moral Decision Making: Model-Free and Model-Based Learning," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 144(4), pages 699-715, September.
    18. Barbara Culiberg & Domen Bajde, 2014. "Do You Need a Receipt? Exploring Consumer Participation in Consumption Tax Evasion as an Ethical Dilemma," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 124(2), pages 271-282, October.
    19. Kim, Ha Youn & Kwon, Yoo Jin, 2017. "Blurring production-consumption boundaries: Making my own luxury bag," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 120-125.
    20. Maduku, Daniel K. & Mpinganjira, Mercy & Rana, Nripendra P. & Thusi, Philile & Ledikwe, Aobakwe & Mkhize, Njabulo Happy-boy, 2023. "Assessing customer passion, commitment, and word-of-mouth intentions in digital assistant usage: The moderating role of technology anxiety," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03600339. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.