IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ininma/v34y2014i5p622-633.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of core and infrastructure business activities on information systems planning and effectiveness

Author

Listed:
  • Mirchandani, Dinesh A.
  • Lederer, Albert L.

Abstract

Core and infrastructure business activities are vital to the organization, and are growing more and more dependent on information systems. Theory suggests that more core and infrastructure business activities would inspire more strategic information systems planning which in turn would result in greater planning effectiveness. One hundred thirty chief information officers in manufacturing companies completed a questionnaire about the extent that their organization performed core and infrastructure business activities, and carried out technical, personnel, and procedures planning. The findings showed that infrastructure activities lead to all three types of planning whereas core activities lead only to procedures planning. Moreover, they showed that technical planning leads to planning effectiveness whereas personnel and procedures planning do not. The findings suggest that future researchers might try to uncover the reasons that core activities do not lead to more information systems planning. For practitioners, the findings suggest that managers reconsider how their organizations respond to core and infrastructure needs, and whether they should adjust their information systems planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Mirchandani, Dinesh A. & Lederer, Albert L., 2014. "The impact of core and infrastructure business activities on information systems planning and effectiveness," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 622-633.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:34:y:2014:i:5:p:622-633
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.06.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401214000632
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.06.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David J. TEECE, 2008. "Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: The Transfer And Licensing Of Know-How And Intellectual Property Understanding the Multinational Enterprise in the Modern World, chapter 5, pages 67-87, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    2. Yolande E. Chan & Sid L. Huff & Donald W. Barclay & Duncan G. Copeland, 1997. "Business Strategic Orientation, Information Systems Strategic Orientation, and Strategic Alignment," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 8(2), pages 125-150, June.
    3. Frank T. Rothaermel & Charles W. L. Hill, 2005. "Technological Discontinuities and Complementary Assets: A Longitudinal Study of Industry and Firm Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 52-70, February.
    4. Bhanu Raghunathan & T. S. Raghunathan, 1994. "Research Report—Adaptation of a Planning System Success Model to Information Systems Planning," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 5(3), pages 326-340, September.
    5. Golovko V. & Mysaka G., 2010. "Information-analytical support of management company cash flow," Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Economics. Вісник Киiвського нацiонального унiверситету iм. Тараса Шевченка. Серiя: Економiка, CyberLeninka;Издательско-полиграфический центр «Киевский университет», issue 118, pages 5-9.
    6. Albert H. Segars & Varun Grover, 1999. "Profiles of Strategic Information Systems Planning," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 199-232, September.
    7. Jörg Henseler & Marko Sarstedt, 2013. "Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 565-580, April.
    8. Jarvis, Cheryl Burke & MacKenzie, Scott B & Podsakoff, Philip M, 2003. "A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 30(2), pages 199-218, September.
    9. Schmidt, C. & Buxmann, Peter, 2011. "Outcomes and success factors of enterprise IT architecture management: empirical insight from the international financial services industry," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 48401, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    10. Armstrong, J. Scott & Overton, Terry S., 1977. "Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys," MPRA Paper 81694, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Brender, Nathalie & Markov, Iliya, 2013. "Risk perception and risk management in cloud computing: Results from a case study of Swiss companies," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 726-733.
    12. Detlor, Brian, 2010. "Information management," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 103-108.
    13. Steven J. Simon & Varun Grover & James T. C. Teng & Kathleen Whitcomb, 1996. "The Relationship of Information System Training Methods and Cognitive Ability to End-User Satisfaction, Comprehension, and Skill Transfer: A Longitudinal Field Study," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 7(4), pages 466-490, December.
    14. Jun Tian & Kanliang Wang & Yan Chen & Björn Johansson, 2010. "From IT deployment capabilities to competitive advantage: An exploratory study in China," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 239-255, July.
    15. Anindita Chakravarty & Rajdeep Grewal & V. Sambamurthy, 2013. "Information Technology Competencies, Organizational Agility, and Firm Performance: Enabling and Facilitating Roles," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 976-997, December.
    16. Bryson, C. & Currie, W., 1995. "IT strategy: Formal rational orthodoxy or contingent adhocracy?," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 23(6), pages 677-689, December.
    17. Nilesh Saraf & Christoph Schlueter Langdon & Sanjay Gosain, 2007. "IS Application Capabilities and Relational Value in Interfirm Partnerships," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 320-339, September.
    18. Chi, Lei & Jones, Kiku G. & Lederer, Albert L. & Li, Pengtao & Newkirk, Henry E. & Sethi, Vijay, 2005. "Environmental assessment in strategic information systems planning," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 253-269.
    19. Hartono, Edward & Li, Xiaotong & Na, Kwan-Sik & Simpson, James T., 2010. "The role of the quality of shared information in interorganizational systems use," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 399-407.
    20. Shaker A. Zahra & Harry J. Sapienza & Per Davidsson, 2006. "Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capabilities: A Review, Model and Research Agenda," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(4), pages 917-955, June.
    21. Tor Guimaraes & Magid Igbaria, 1996. "Exploring the Relationship Between EUC Problems and Success," Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), IGI Global, vol. 9(2), pages 5-16, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brusset, Xavier & Teller, Christoph, 2017. "Supply chain capabilities, risks, and resilience," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 59-68.
    2. Mirchandani, Dinesh A. & Lederer, Albert L., 2008. "The impact of autonomy on information systems planning effectiveness," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 789-807, October.
    3. Wamba, Samuel Fosso & Dubey, Rameshwar & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Akter, Shahriar, 2020. "The performance effects of big data analytics and supply chain ambidexterity: The moderating effect of environmental dynamism," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    4. Dominik M. Wielgos & Christian Homburg & Christina Kuehnl, 2021. "Digital business capability: its impact on firm and customer performance," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 762-789, July.
    5. Adomako, Samuel & Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph & Donbesuur, Francis & Ahsan, Mujtaba & Danso, Albert & Uddin, Moshfique, 2022. "Strategic agility of SMEs in emerging economies: Antecedents, consequences and boundary conditions," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(6).
    6. Natarajan Balasubramanian, 2011. "New Plant Venture Performance Differences Among Incumbent, Diversifying, and Entrepreneurial Firms: The Impact of Industry Learning Intensity," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(3), pages 549-565, March.
    7. Brusset, Xavier, 2016. "Does supply chain visibility enhance agility?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P1), pages 46-59.
    8. Teubner, Rolf Alexander & Mocker, Martin, 2008. "A literature overview on strategic information systems planning," ERCIS Working Papers 6, University of Münster, European Research Center for Information Systems (ERCIS).
    9. Mikalef, Patrick & Pateli, Adamantia, 2017. "Information technology-enabled dynamic capabilities and their indirect effect on competitive performance: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1-16.
    10. Jörg Freiling & Christoph Lütke Schelhowe, 2014. "The Impact of Entrepreneurial Orientation on the Performance and Speed of Internationalization," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 10(4), pages 169-199.
    11. Rogier van de Wetering & Tom Hendrickx & Sjaak Brinkkemper & Sherah Kurnia, 2021. "The Impact of EA-Driven Dynamic Capabilities, Innovativeness, and Structure on Organizational Benefits: A Variance and fsQCA Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-23, May.
    12. Han, Jeong Hugh & Wang, Yingli & Naim, Mohamed, 2017. "Reconceptualization of information technology flexibility for supply chain management: An empirical study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 196-215.
    13. Andreas Pfnür & Benjamin Wagner, 2020. "Transformation of the real estate and construction industry: empirical findings from Germany," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 90(7), pages 975-1019, August.
    14. Waleczek, Peter & von den Driesch, Till & Flatten, Tessa C. & Brettel, Malte, 2019. "On the dynamic bundles behind operations management and research and development," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 175-187.
    15. Terence J. V. Saldanha & Dongwon Lee & Sunil Mithas, 2020. "Aligning Information Technology and Business: The Differential Effects of Alignment During Investment Planning, Delivery, and Change," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 1260-1281, December.
    16. Tessa Christina Flatten & Andreas Engelen & Timo Möller & Malte Brettel, 2015. "How Entrepreneurial Firms Profit from Pricing Capabilities: An Examination of Technology–Based Ventures," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(5), pages 1111-1136, September.
    17. Blesa, Andreu & Ripollés, María, 2021. "Critical capabilities for widening international new ventures’ geographical scope," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 201-213.
    18. Hazen, Benjamin T. & Bradley, Randy V. & Bell, John E. & In, Joonhwan & Byrd, Terry A., 2017. "Enterprise architecture: A competence-based approach to achieving agility and firm performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 566-577.
    19. S. Arunachalam & Sridhar N. Ramaswami & Pol Herrmann & Doug Walker, 2018. "Innovation pathway to profitability: the role of entrepreneurial orientation and marketing capabilities," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 744-766, July.
    20. Tarifa Fernández, Jorge & de Burgos Jiménez, Jerónimo & Céspedes Lorente, José Joaquín, 2018. "Absorptive capacity as a confounder of the process of supply chain integration," MPRA Paper 120125, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2018.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:34:y:2014:i:5:p:622-633. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-information-management .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.