IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v94y2010i2p158-163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Crossborder trade in health services: Lessons from the European laboratory

Author

Listed:
  • Jarman, Holly
  • Greer, Scott

Abstract

We find four key lessons that health policymakers and practitioners should be aware of: the potential of services liberalization to incur high transition and transaction costs; the difficulty of reconciling economic and social policy goals and the subsequent high likelihood of backlash; the tendency of rule-based systems to promote policy spillover; and the importance (and difficulty) of early monitoring in order to avoid unwanted policy outcomes. We conclude that continued awareness of new policy developments, coordination of expertise on health and trade and preemptive regulation are vital in order to deal with the expansion of crossborder trade in health services.

Suggested Citation

  • Jarman, Holly & Greer, Scott, 2010. "Crossborder trade in health services: Lessons from the European laboratory," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 158-163, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:94:y:2010:i:2:p:158-163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168-8510(09)00240-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Drake, William J. & Nicolaïdis, Kalypso, 1992. "Ideas, interests, and institutionalization: “trade in services†and the Uruguay Round," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 46(1), pages 37-100, January.
    2. Shaffer, E.R. & Waitzkin, H. & Brenner, J. & Jasso-Aguilar, R., 2005. "Global trade and public health," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 95(1), pages 23-34.
    3. Wunsch-Vincent, Sacha, 2006. "The Internet, cross-border trade in services, and the GATS: lessons from US–Gambling," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(3), pages 319-355, November.
    4. Stone Sweet, Alec, 2004. "The Judicial Construction of Europe," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199275533, Decembrie.
    5. Smith, Richard D, 2004. "Foreign direct investment and trade in health services: A review of the literature," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 59(11), pages 2313-2323, December.
    6. Aaditya Mattoo & Sacha Wunsch-Vincent, 2004. "Pre-Empting Protectionism in Services: The GATS and Outsourcing," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 7(4), pages 765-800, December.
    7. Martineau, Tim & Decker, Karola & Bundred, Peter, 2004. ""Brain drain" of health professionals: from rhetoric to responsible action," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(1), pages 1-10, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Scott L. Greer, 2011. "The weakness of strong policies and the strength of weak policies: Law, experimentalist governance, and supporting coalitions in European Union health care policy," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(2), pages 187-203, June.
    2. Vololona Rabeharisoa & Orla O'Donovan, 2013. "‘Europe of patients, Europe for patients’: the Europeanization of healthcare policies by European patients’ organizations," CSI Working Papers Series 030, Centre de Sociologie de l'Innovation (CSI), Mines ParisTech.
    3. Jarman, Holly, 2017. "Trade policy governance: What health policymakers and advocates need to know," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(11), pages 1105-1112.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert Frith, 2008. "Cosmopolitan Democracy and the EU: The Case of Gender," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 56(1), pages 215-236, March.
    2. Scharpf, Fritz W., 2007. "Reflections on multilevel legitimacy," MPIfG Working Paper 07/3, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    3. Carsten Hefeker & Michael Neugart, 2016. "Policy deviations, uncertainty, and the European Court of Justice," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 547-567, December.
    4. Robert Basedow, 2021. "The EU's International Investment Policy ten years on: the Policy‐Making Implications of Unintended Competence Transfers," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(3), pages 643-660, May.
    5. Julián Tole Martínez, 2019. "Colombia entre los TLC y la OMC: ¿liberación o administración del comercio internacional?," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, number 1139, October.
    6. Arthur Dyevre & Nicolas Lampach, 2021. "Issue attention on international courts: Evidence from the European Court of Justice," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 793-815, October.
    7. Sandra Lavenex & Flavia Jurje, 2021. "Opening‐up labor mobility? Rising powers' rulemaking in trade agreements," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 598-615, July.
    8. Mihaela Tomaziu-Todosia, 2020. "The Importance of Health in All Policies (HiAP)," Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 238-249, February.
    9. Arnaud Bourgain & Patrice Pieretti & Benteng Zou, 2008. "The Shortage of Medical Workers in Sub-Saharan Africa and Substitution Policy," DEM Discussion Paper Series 08-13, Department of Economics at the University of Luxembourg.
    10. Coast, Joanna, 2018. "A history that goes hand in hand: Reflections on the development of health economics and the role played by Social Science & Medicine, 1967–2017," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 227-232.
    11. Achim Hurrelmann, 2023. "Constitutional Abeyances: Reflecting on EU Treaty Development in Light of the Canadian Experience," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(3), pages 241-250.
    12. Philipp Genschel & Markus Jachtenfuchs, 2017. "From market integration to core state powers: the Eurozone crisis, the refugee crisis and integration theory," RSCAS Working Papers 2017/26, European University Institute.
    13. Nathan Lillie & Ian Greer, 2007. "Industrial Relations, Migration, and Neoliberal Politics: The Case of the European Construction Sector," Politics & Society, , vol. 35(4), pages 551-581, December.
    14. Mai'a K. Davis Cross, 2015. "The Limits of Epistemic Communities: EU Security Agencies," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(1), pages 90-100.
    15. Susan Newberry, 2004. "Trade in Services: Wider Implications for Accounting Standard-Setters and Accountants," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 14(33), pages 11-21, July.
    16. Cornelia Woll, 2010. "Firm Interests in Uncertain Times: Business Lobbying in Multilateral Service Liberalization," Sciences Po publications info:hdl:2441/f5vtl5h9a73, Sciences Po.
    17. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/8601 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Evi Sachini & Nikolaos Karampekios & Charalampos Chrysomallidis, 2020. "Introducing Human Capital in Greek Higher Education Institutes in the Postcrisis Era. The Case of the “Acquisition of Academic Teaching Experience for New Scientists” Public Initiative," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 11(4), pages 1630-1645, December.
    19. Оksana Strelchenko & Svitlana Okhrimenko & Dmytro Pavlov, 2020. "The Role of the Institute of Medical Law in the Postmodern Society," Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 11(3), pages 145-159, October.
    20. Aaronson, Susan Ariel, 2019. "What Are We Talking about When We Talk about Digital Protectionism?," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(4), pages 541-577, October.
    21. Fritz W. Scharpf, 2009. "The Asymmetry of European Integration - or why the EU cannot be a Social Market Economy," KFG Working Papers p0006, Free University Berlin.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:94:y:2010:i:2:p:158-163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.