IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/gamebe/v142y2023icp645-665.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coordination with heterogeneous interaction constraints

Author

Listed:
  • Lu, Feifei
  • Shi, Fei

Abstract

We study a coevolutionary model of network formation in minimum-effort games. Agents dynamically choose both their effort levels and their interaction partners, but face heterogeneous constraints on how many partners they can interact with. The dynamics under heterogeneity behaves very differently from the one in the homogeneous case, with gradual transitions spreading across the population stepwise instead of sudden adoptions. The long-run outcomes depend crucially on the distribution of interaction constraints. The efficient (highest-effort) convention prevails in the long run even when many agents have loose constraints, if enough agents have tight constraints. The lowest-effort convention dominates if too many agents have loose constraints. The coexistence of conventions is also possible for certain distributions of constraints.

Suggested Citation

  • Lu, Feifei & Shi, Fei, 2023. "Coordination with heterogeneous interaction constraints," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 645-665.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:142:y:2023:i:c:p:645-665
    DOI: 10.1016/j.geb.2023.09.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899825623001446
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.geb.2023.09.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Minimum-effort games; Network formation; Equilibrium selection; Heterogeneity;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C72 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Noncooperative Games
    • C73 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Stochastic and Dynamic Games; Evolutionary Games
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • D85 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Network Formation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:142:y:2023:i:c:p:645-665. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/622836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.