IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finlet/v80y2025ics1544612325007044.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Residents’ environmental participation and corporate green management: The influence of mandatory and voluntary behaviors

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Qian
  • Wang, Zhouyuanye
  • Zhou, Ruodan

Abstract

Residents’ participation in mandatory (government-driven) and voluntary (self-initiated) environmental behaviors may have different impacts on corporate green management. This study examines Chinese A-share listed companies to explore how these distinct behaviors influence corporate green practices and to uncover the underlying mechanisms. The findings reveal that mandatory behaviors are particularly effective in reducing pollution and enhancing transparency, whereas voluntary behaviors are more influential in driving corporate innovation. The mechanism analysis reveals that the development of ENGOs primarily drives improvements in pollution control and transparency associated with mandatory behaviors by exerting regulatory pressure on companies, whereas media attention amplifies the effects of voluntary behaviors, particularly in promoting transparency. These findings highlight the distinct and complementary roles of residents’ mandatory and voluntary environmental behaviors in influencing corporate green management and offer valuable insights into the mechanisms driving these outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Qian & Wang, Zhouyuanye & Zhou, Ruodan, 2025. "Residents’ environmental participation and corporate green management: The influence of mandatory and voluntary behaviors," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:80:y:2025:i:c:s1544612325007044
    DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2025.107444
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612325007044
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.frl.2025.107444?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:80:y:2025:i:c:s1544612325007044. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/frl .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.