IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finana/v97y2025ics1057521924007221.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of management equity incentive on firms' risk-taking under different monitoring conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Geng, Haipeng
  • Su, Zhongfeng
  • Wang, Junkai

Abstract

The influence of managerial equity incentive on firms' risk-taking remains controversial within two dominant paradigms: agency theory and behavioral agency model (BAM). To reconcile the tension between these paradigms within an integrated framework, we explore the divergent effects of managerial equity incentive on deviant and aspirational risk-taking, reflected by bribery expenditure and R&D intensity, respectively. Additionally, we examine the moderating effects of institutional shareholder monitoring and government monitoring. Using data on 12,660 observations of Chinese listed firms from 2009 to 2019, we find that managerial equity incentive negatively impacts bribery expenditure, a tendency that is intensified by both institutional shareholder monitoring and government monitoring. Conversely, it positively affects R&D intensity, with this effect weakened by institutional shareholder monitoring but strengthened by government monitoring. This study provides a novel insight into reconciling the controversy between agency theory and BAM by illustrating the different roles of managerial equity incentive in various types of risk-taking under varying monitoring conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Geng, Haipeng & Su, Zhongfeng & Wang, Junkai, 2025. "The impact of management equity incentive on firms' risk-taking under different monitoring conditions," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:97:y:2025:i:c:s1057521924007221
    DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103790
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521924007221
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103790?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qingjie Zhou & Mingyue Du & Zhenling Chen & Tianshun Miao & Guoge Yang, 2022. "Do R&D Subsidies Improve Operational Performance? New evidence from China," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2022(5), pages 398-416.
    2. Song, Yanheng & Xian, Rui, 2024. "Institutional investors' corporate site visits and firm-level climate change risk disclosure," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    3. Tachia Chin & Yi Shi & Chris Rowley & Jianwei Meng, 2021. "Confucian business model canvas in the Asia Pacific: a Yin-Yang harmony cognition to value creation and innovation," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 342-358, May.
    4. Armstrong, Christopher S. & Vashishtha, Rahul, 2012. "Executive stock options, differential risk-taking incentives, and firm value," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(1), pages 70-88.
    5. Chen, Chung-wen & Cullen, John B. & Parboteeah, K. Praveen, 2015. "Are Manager-controlled Firms More Likely to Bribe than Shareholder-controlled Firms: A Cross-cultural Analysis," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 343-365, June.
    6. Jana Oehmichen & Sebastian Firk & Michael Wolff & Franz Maybuechen, 2021. "Standing out from the crowd: Dedicated institutional investors and strategy uniqueness," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(6), pages 1083-1108, June.
    7. Liuyang Ren & Xi Zhong & Liangyong Wan, 2022. "Defending the shell: differential effects of delisting pressure on R&D intensity and bribery expenditure," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(5), pages 1437-1470, July.
    8. Bajo, Emanuele & Croci, Ettore & Marinelli, Nicoletta, 2020. "Institutional investor networks and firm value," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 65-80.
    9. Yan Yu & Yi-Tsung Lee, 2023. "Spillover Effects of Preventive Regulation and Corporate R&D Investment Catering: Evidence from China," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(11), pages 3391-3401, September.
    10. Ke Zhang & Jenny Jing Wang & Yanqi Sun & Sarowar Hossain, 2021. "Financial slack, institutional shareholding and enterprise innovation investment: evidence from China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(2), pages 3235-3259, June.
    11. Yi, Jingtao & Teng, Da & Meng, Shuang, 2018. "Foreign ownership and bribery: Agency and institutional perspectives," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 34-45.
    12. Baixauli-Soler, J. Samuel & Belda-Ruiz, Maria & Sanchez-Marin, Gregorio, 2015. "Executive stock options, gender diversity in the top management team, and firm risk taking," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 451-463.
    13. Martin Larraza‐Kintana & Robert M. Wiseman & Luis R. Gomez‐Mejia & Theresa M. Welbourne, 2007. "Disentangling compensation and employment risks using the behavioral agency model," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(10), pages 1001-1019, October.
    14. Cynthia E. Devers & Gerry McNamara & Robert M. Wiseman & Mathias Arrfelt, 2008. "Moving Closer to the Action: Examining Compensation Design Effects on Firm Risk," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 548-566, August.
    15. Martin Eling & Sebastian D. Marek, 2014. "Corporate Governance and Risk Taking: Evidence From the U.K. and German Insurance Markets," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 81(3), pages 653-682, September.
    16. Zhou, Kevin Zheng & Wang, Kui & Xu, Dean & Xie, En, 2022. "Drinking poison to quench thirst: Does bribery foster firm performance in China?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 505-517.
    17. Shane W. Mathews & Masahiro Maruyama & Yuka Sakurai & Ralf Bebenroth & Edwina Luck & Hsiu-Li Chen & Edward Franco, 2018. "Internet resources and capabilities: Japanese SME risk-taking, industry and performance," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(5), pages 675-692, October.
    18. Nan Wang & Mingdi Xiao & Ivan Savin, 2021. "Complementarity effect in the innovation strategy: internal R&D and acquisition of capital with embodied technology," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 459-482, April.
    19. Wu, Jianfeng & Tu, Rungting, 2007. "CEO stock option pay and R&D spending: a behavioral agency explanation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(5), pages 482-492, May.
    20. Hongbin Cai & Hanming Fang & Lixin Colin Xu, 2011. "Eat, Drink, Firms, Government: An Investigation of Corruption from the Entertainment and Travel Costs of Chinese Firms," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 54(1), pages 55-78.
    21. Alessandri, Todd M. & Mammen, Jan & Eddleston, Kimberly, 2018. "Managerial incentives, myopic loss aversion, and firm risk: A comparison of family and non-family firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 19-27.
    22. Han Chen & Soon Suk Yoon, 2022. "Does technology innovation in finance alleviate financing constraints and reduce debt-financing costs? Evidence from China," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 467-492, August.
    23. Jared Harris & Philip Bromiley, 2007. "Incentives to Cheat: The Influence of Executive Compensation and Firm Performance on Financial Misrepresentation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 350-367, June.
    24. Dong, Zhiyong & Wang, Cong & Xie, Fei, 2010. "Do executive stock options induce excessive risk taking?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 2518-2529, October.
    25. Coles, Jeffrey L. & Daniel, Naveen D. & Naveen, Lalitha, 2006. "Managerial incentives and risk-taking," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(2), pages 431-468, February.
    26. Yujin Jeong & Robert J. Weiner, 2012. "Who bribes? Evidence from the United Nations' oil‐for‐food program," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(12), pages 1363-1383, December.
    27. Alam, Ashraful & Uddin, Moshfique & Yazdifar, Hassan, 2019. "Institutional determinants of R&D investment: Evidence from emerging markets," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 34-44.
    28. Quang-Anh Le & Cheng-Yu Lee, 2023. "Below-aspiration performance and risk-taking behaviour in the context of Taiwanese electronic firms: a contingency analysis," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 654-677, May.
    29. Hunjra, Ahmed Imran & Bagh, Tanveer & Palma, Alessia & Goodell, John W., 2024. "Is enterprise risk-taking less sensitive to financial flexibility post COVID-19? Evidence from non-linear patterns," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PB).
    30. Kun Su & Liuchuang Li & Rui Wan, 2017. "Ultimate ownership, risk-taking and firm value: evidence from China," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 10-26, January.
    31. Jun Huang & Zhixin Duan & Mingsheng Hu & Yun Li, 2022. "More Stable, More Sustainable: Does TMT Stability Affect Sustainable Corporate Social Responsibility?," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(4), pages 921-938, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Niklas Kreilkamp & Sascha Matanovic & Maximilian Schmidt & Arnt Wöhrmann, 2023. "How executive incentive design affects risk-taking: a literature review," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(7), pages 2349-2374, October.
    2. J. Samuel Baixauli-Soler & Maria Belda-Ruiz & Gregorio Sanchez-Marin, 2017. "An executive hierarchy analysis of stock options: Does gender matter?," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 737-766, October.
    3. Baixauli-Soler, J. Samuel & Belda-Ruiz, Maria & Sanchez-Marin, Gregorio, 2015. "Executive stock options, gender diversity in the top management team, and firm risk taking," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 451-463.
    4. Alessandri, Todd M. & Mammen, Jan & Eddleston, Kimberly, 2018. "Managerial incentives, myopic loss aversion, and firm risk: A comparison of family and non-family firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 19-27.
    5. Alina G. Andrei & Mirko H. Benischke & Geoffrey P. Martin, 2024. "Behavioral agency and the efficacy of analysts as external monitors: Examining the moderating role of CEO personality," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(1), pages 113-143, January.
    6. Abdoh, Hussein, 2023. "Rivals risk-taking incentives and firm corporate policy," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 106-123.
    7. Papageorgiadis, Nikolaos & Procopiou, Andreas & Sofka, Wolfgang, 2023. "Unintended consequences of outcome based compensation – How CEO bonuses, stocks and stock options affect their firms' patent litigation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(8).
    8. Liuyang Ren & Xi Zhong & Liangyong Wan, 2022. "Defending the shell: differential effects of delisting pressure on R&D intensity and bribery expenditure," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(5), pages 1437-1470, July.
    9. Hailiang Zou & Yunfeng Lu & Guoyou Qi, 2023. "Does Pay Disparity within Top Management Teams Lead to Bribery Activity? The Moderation of Demographic Diversity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-23, February.
    10. Jiraporn, Pornsit & Chatjuthamard, Pattanaporn & Tong, Shenghui & Kim, Young Sang, 2015. "Does corporate governance influence corporate risk-taking? Evidence from the Institutional Shareholders Services (ISS)," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 13(C), pages 105-112.
    11. Hong, Jieying, 2019. "Managerial compensation incentives and corporate debt maturity: Evidence from FAS 123R," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 388-414.
    12. Zhou, Jia, 2025. "Impact of non-financial listed companies' investment in wealth management products on industrial investment efficiency and R&D expenditure: A dual effect analysis," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    13. Gu, Leilei, 2023. "Executives’ financial experience and myopic marketing management: A myopic loss-aversion perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    14. Zhang, Huiming & Wan, Dayu & Sun, Chuanwang & Wu, Kai & Lin, Caixia, 2023. "Does political inspection promote corporate green innovation?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    15. John S. Marsh & Rachel Graefe-Anderson, 2018. "Undermining incentives: CEO reactions to compensation rebalancing," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 22(2), pages 365-391, June.
    16. Castro, Paula & Keasey, Kevin & Amor-Tapia, Borja & Tascon, Maria T. & Vallascas, Francesco, 2020. "Does debt concentration depend on the risk-taking incentives in CEO compensation?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    17. O'Connell, Vincent & Lee, Jong-Ho & O'Sullivan, Don, 2018. "The influence of CEO equity incentives on licensing," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 266-277.
    18. Lin, Yinghua & Ye, Jingjing, 2024. "The impact of corporate R&D on the transformation of intellectual property into intangible assets," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    19. Clara Xiaoling Chen & Minjeong (MJ) Kim & Laura Yue Li & Wei Zhu, 2022. "Accounting Performance Goals in CEO Compensation Contracts and Corporate Risk Taking," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(8), pages 6039-6058, August.
    20. Chari, Murali D.R. & David, Parthiban & Duru, Augustine & Zhao, Yijiang, 2019. "Bowman's risk-return paradox: An agency theory perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 357-375.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:97:y:2025:i:c:s1057521924007221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620166 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.