IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v58y2016icp176-183.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding change among multi-problem families: Learnings from a formative program assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Millett, Lina Sapokaite
  • Ben-David, Vered
  • Jonson-Reid, Melissa
  • Echele, Greg
  • Moussette, Pam
  • Atkins, Valerie

Abstract

This paper describes the implementation of a long-term voluntary intervention to prevent chronic maltreatment among multi-problem families with histories of child welfare involvement. A small formative evaluation included a limited number of interviews with program participants during the first year of program implementation (n=10), a retrospective case file review (n=17) of closed cases following the first three years of implementation, and notes from ongoing meetings and discussion with program staff. Findings regarding client engagement, long-term interaction between risk and services, and program refinement are discussed. Despite the program’s voluntary nature, positive comments from families, and extensive engagement strategies, only about 22% of families remained engaged for the full two-year program. Material hardship was one of the most persistent risk factors from baseline to termination. In many cases, unforeseen negative events occurred that, at least partly, derailed progress. In all cases, progress made was not reflective of a consistent linear process used in the design of most child welfare programs. Implications for program theory and design are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Millett, Lina Sapokaite & Ben-David, Vered & Jonson-Reid, Melissa & Echele, Greg & Moussette, Pam & Atkins, Valerie, 2016. "Understanding change among multi-problem families: Learnings from a formative program assessment," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 176-183.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:58:y:2016:i:c:p:176-183
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.06.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718916300441
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Harnett, Paul H., 2007. "A procedure for assessing parents' capacity for change in child protection cases," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(9), pages 1179-1188, September.
    2. Staudt, Marlys & Drake, Brett, 2002. "Intensive Family Preservation Services: Where's the Crisis?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(9-10), pages 777-795.
    3. Silovsky, Jane F. & Bard, David & Chaffin, Mark & Hecht, Debra & Burris, Lorena & Owora, Arthur & Beasley, Lana & Doughty, Debbie & Lutzker, John, 2011. "Prevention of child maltreatment in high-risk rural families: A randomized clinical trial with child welfare outcomes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(8), pages 1435-1444, August.
    4. Anderson, Michael L., 2008. "Multiple Inference and Gender Differences in the Effects of Early Intervention: A Reevaluation of the Abecedarian, Perry Preschool, and Early Training Projects," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 103(484), pages 1481-1495.
    5. Barth, Richard P. & Weigensberg, Elizabeth C. & Fisher, Philip A. & Fetrow, Becky & Green, Rebecca L., 2008. "Reentry of elementary aged children following reunification from foster care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 353-364, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:58:y:2016:i:c:p:176-183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.