Author
Listed:
- Hoens, Sylvia
- D’Hooghe, Suzannah
- Kint, Octavia
- Quintiens, Bert
- Brosens, Dorien
- De Donder, Liesbeth
- Smetcoren, An-Sofie
Abstract
This paper examines the changes community health workers experienced after following a nine-month work-training program and the enabling/disabling factors leading to these changes. Using the Most Significant Change technique, stories from community health workers were collected through individual interviews (N = 9), after which other community health works discussed these stories in a focus group (N = 7). Results showed that Most Significant Changes were: increased knowledge, social skills and attitudes, career discovery and facilitated employability, expanded social networks and support systems, and gained social recognition. Mentoring, peer learning and peer support, and experience-based learning were indispensable in realizing those changes. Participants selected stories as significant when they were recognizable, inspirable, or admirable. Finally, our experience suggests that the Most Significant Change technique mostly identifies positive changes, which has the potential to move programs forward. In future evaluation research using the Most Significant Change, we suggest not only a horizontal (with peers) but also vertical story selection process (with coordinators) to have a deeper understanding of different perspectives and their reasoning behind selecting stories.
Suggested Citation
Hoens, Sylvia & D’Hooghe, Suzannah & Kint, Octavia & Quintiens, Bert & Brosens, Dorien & De Donder, Liesbeth & Smetcoren, An-Sofie, 2025.
"Capturing the most significant change after a work-training program for community health workers,"
Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:epplan:v:112:y:2025:i:c:s014971892500134x
DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102667
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:112:y:2025:i:c:s014971892500134x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.