IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v111y2025ics0149718925000618.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does that extra email make a difference? Using early-semester targeted outreach to increase academic advising visits

Author

Listed:
  • Grafe, Carl
  • Balls, Daniel
  • Taylor, Matthew
  • Worthen, Kevin

Abstract

Brigham Young University–Idaho has implemented various strategies to encourage students to seek academic advising, including early-semester outreach using data from the university’s Learning Management System (LMS). In Fall 2022, the office of Career and Academic Advising identified students for outreach based on whether their week four estimated term GPA in the LMS was below 2.5. We used traditional and bias-corrected covariate-adjusted regression discontinuity analysis approaches to assess the size of the intervention effect. While the traditional regression discontinuity analysis approach did not detect a statistically significant effect, the bias-corrected covariate-adjusted approach identified a change in the number of visits that was 237 advising visits per 1000 students higher in the outreach group than in the non-outreach group. This study supports the use of early-semester targeted email outreach to increase student meetings with academic advisors. Warehoused LMS data, well-formulated data reporting infrastructure, and more sophisticated statistical analyses may be helpful in implementing similar outreaches and observing their associated impact.

Suggested Citation

  • Grafe, Carl & Balls, Daniel & Taylor, Matthew & Worthen, Kevin, 2025. "Does that extra email make a difference? Using early-semester targeted outreach to increase academic advising visits," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:111:y:2025:i:c:s0149718925000618
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102594
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925000618
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102594?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:111:y:2025:i:c:s0149718925000618. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.