IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v109y2025ics0149718924001241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the effects of collaborative governance: Case of a digital education project

Author

Listed:
  • Bonny, Stéphane
  • Cahlikova, Tereza

Abstract

The introduction of digital curricula has become topical due to the increasingly pervasive role of ICTs in the society implying the necessity to develop digital skills from a young age. Because of the lack of in-house know-how, governments often need to rely on external actors providing digital education expertise. Organisational structures of such programs thus resemble collaborative governance regimes with distinct roles attributed to specific stakeholders. In this study, we explore cross-sector collaboration structures of the DigEd project aiming to introduce digital education in different cycles of compulsory and post-compulsory schooling on the local level in Switzerland. Findings indicate that the lack of leadership and of clarification of each partner’s role during the pilot phase of the project did not allow for the creation of a shared understanding among the involved partners and led to the domination of a limited number of influential actors. This tendency is confirmed through a graphic SNA analysis clearly illustrating the centrality of non-state actors. This contribution shows that it is not only the effects of projects that should be of interest to evaluators, but also their internal collaboration structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Bonny, Stéphane & Cahlikova, Tereza, 2025. "Evaluating the effects of collaborative governance: Case of a digital education project," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:109:y:2025:i:c:s0149718924001241
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102522
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718924001241
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102522?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eva Sørensen & Jacob Torfing, 2021. "Radical and disruptive answers to downstream problems in collaborative governance?," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(11), pages 1590-1611, November.
    2. Kati Lehtonen & Petri Uusikylä, 2021. "How Do Networks Reflect Collaborative Governance? The Case of a Sport Policy Program," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-14, July.
    3. Nichols, Laura, 2002. "Participatory program planning: including program participants and evaluators," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 1-14, February.
    4. Carmine Bianchi & Greta Nasi & William C. Rivenbark, 2021. "Implementing collaborative governance: models, experiences, and challenges," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(11), pages 1581-1589, November.
    5. Myrna Mandell & Toddi Steelman, 2003. "Understanding what can be accomplished through interorganizational innovations The importance of typologies, context and management strategies," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(2), pages 197-224, June.
    6. Hysing, Erik, 2022. "Designing collaborative governance that is fit for purpose: theorising policy support and voluntary action for road safety in Sweden," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 42(2), pages 201-223, June.
    7. Ines Mergel, 2018. "Open innovation in the public sector: drivers and barriers for the adoption of Challenge.gov," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(5), pages 726-745, May.
    8. Dimitrios C. Christopoulos, 2008. "The Governance of Networks: Heuristic or Formal Analysis? A Reply to Rachel Parker," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 56(2), pages 475-481, June.
    9. Carey Doberstein, 2016. "Designing Collaborative Governance Decision-Making in Search of a ‘Collaborative Advantage’," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(6), pages 819-841, July.
    10. Dimitrios C. Christopoulos, 2008. "The Governance of Networks: Heuristic or Formal Analysis? A Reply to Rachel Parker," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 56, pages 475-481, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Irena Valková, 2017. "Centrality in the network of Regional Trade Agreements: Effects on the strategies of the Arctic claimant states," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 20(2), pages 122-143, June.
    2. Moira V. Faul, 2016. "Networks and Power: Why Networks are Hierarchical Not Flat and What Can Be Done About It," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 7(2), pages 185-197, May.
    3. Mark Goodwin, 2009. "Which Networks Matter in Education Governance? A Reply to Ball's ‘New Philanthropy, New Networks and New Governance in Education’," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 57(3), pages 680-687, October.
    4. Babette Never, 2011. "Who Drives Change? Comparing the Evolution of Domestic Climate Governance in India and South Africa," Working Papers id:4521, eSocialSciences.
    5. Stephen J. Ball, 2008. "New Philanthropy, New Networks and New Governance in Education," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 56(4), pages 747-765, December.
    6. Nochta, Timea & Skelcher, Chris, 2020. "Network governance in low-carbon energy transitions in European cities: A comparative analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    7. Allam, Dina, 2021. "Explaining the persistence of “decentralisation” of education in Egypt," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    8. Wiegant, Daniel & Dewulf, Art & Van Zeben, Josephine, 2024. "Alignment mechanisms to effectively govern the sustainable development goals," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    9. Batory Agnes & Svensson Sara, 2019. "The fuzzy concept of collaborative governance: A systematic review of the state of the art," Central European Journal of Public Policy, Sciendo, vol. 13(2), pages 28-39, December.
    10. Andrieli Vizzoto & Jorge Renato Verschoore, 2023. "What Drives Network Governance? A Microstructural Approach," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 17(11), pages 1-78, February.
    11. Eristian WIBISONO, 2024. "Strengthening Civil Society Engagement In Regional Innovation Policy: A Quadruple Helix Perspective," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(3), pages 49-69, August.
    12. McNamara Madeleine W., 2011. "Processes of Cross-Sector Collaboration: A Case Study of the Virginia Coastal Zone Management Program," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 2(2), pages 1-22, November.
    13. Lidija Stefanovska, 2014. "Challenges in Creating Competitive Strategies-Comparasion between Production and Service Activities," Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, Educational Research Multimedia & Publications,India, vol. 5(1), pages 01-08, January.
    14. Massey, Oliver T., 2011. "A proposed model for the analysis and interpretation of focus groups in evaluation research," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 21-28, February.
    15. Abdelghani Koura & Abdeslam Boudhar & Mohamed Oudgou, 2024. "Convergence of public policies: Aligning policies and actors for sustainable financing of Moroccan SMEs—MACTOR analysis," Post-Print hal-04719058, HAL.
    16. Benoît Desmarchelier & Faridah Djellal & Faïz Gallouj, 2018. "Public Service Innovation Networks (PSINs): Collaborating for Innovation and Value Creation," Working Papers halshs-01934275, HAL.
    17. Francesca Imperiale & Alessandro Sancino & Roberta Fasiello & Paolo Ricci, 2024. "Governing public heritage assets with civil society: exploring the typologies of collaboration by the dominant actor," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 28(4), pages 1151-1197, December.
    18. Raul Lejano & Savita Shankar, 2013. "The contextualist turn and schematics of institutional fit: Theory and a case study from Southern India," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 46(1), pages 83-102, March.
    19. Watson, Rosina & Wilson, Hugh N. & Macdonald, Emma K., 2020. "Business-nonprofit engagement in sustainability-oriented innovation: What works for whom and why?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 87-98.
    20. Olsen, Odd Einar & Lindoe, Preben, 2004. "Trailing research based evaluation; phases and roles," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 371-380, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:109:y:2025:i:c:s0149718924001241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.