IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v109y2025ics0149718924001241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the effects of collaborative governance: Case of a digital education project

Author

Listed:
  • Bonny, Stéphane
  • Cahlikova, Tereza

Abstract

The introduction of digital curricula has become topical due to the increasingly pervasive role of ICTs in the society implying the necessity to develop digital skills from a young age. Because of the lack of in-house know-how, governments often need to rely on external actors providing digital education expertise. Organisational structures of such programs thus resemble collaborative governance regimes with distinct roles attributed to specific stakeholders. In this study, we explore cross-sector collaboration structures of the DigEd project aiming to introduce digital education in different cycles of compulsory and post-compulsory schooling on the local level in Switzerland. Findings indicate that the lack of leadership and of clarification of each partner’s role during the pilot phase of the project did not allow for the creation of a shared understanding among the involved partners and led to the domination of a limited number of influential actors. This tendency is confirmed through a graphic SNA analysis clearly illustrating the centrality of non-state actors. This contribution shows that it is not only the effects of projects that should be of interest to evaluators, but also their internal collaboration structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Bonny, Stéphane & Cahlikova, Tereza, 2025. "Evaluating the effects of collaborative governance: Case of a digital education project," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:109:y:2025:i:c:s0149718924001241
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102522
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718924001241
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102522?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eva Sørensen & Jacob Torfing, 2021. "Radical and disruptive answers to downstream problems in collaborative governance?," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(11), pages 1590-1611, November.
    2. Kati Lehtonen & Petri Uusikylä, 2021. "How Do Networks Reflect Collaborative Governance? The Case of a Sport Policy Program," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-14, July.
    3. Nichols, Laura, 2002. "Participatory program planning: including program participants and evaluators," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 1-14, February.
    4. Carmine Bianchi & Greta Nasi & William C. Rivenbark, 2021. "Implementing collaborative governance: models, experiences, and challenges," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(11), pages 1581-1589, November.
    5. Myrna Mandell & Toddi Steelman, 2003. "Understanding what can be accomplished through interorganizational innovations The importance of typologies, context and management strategies," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(2), pages 197-224, June.
    6. Hysing, Erik, 2022. "Designing collaborative governance that is fit for purpose: theorising policy support and voluntary action for road safety in Sweden," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 42(2), pages 201-223, June.
    7. Ines Mergel, 2018. "Open innovation in the public sector: drivers and barriers for the adoption of Challenge.gov," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(5), pages 726-745, May.
    8. Dimitrios C. Christopoulos, 2008. "The Governance of Networks: Heuristic or Formal Analysis? A Reply to Rachel Parker," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 56(2), pages 475-481, June.
    9. Carey Doberstein, 2016. "Designing Collaborative Governance Decision-Making in Search of a ‘Collaborative Advantage’," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(6), pages 819-841, July.
    10. Dimitrios C. Christopoulos, 2008. "The Governance of Networks: Heuristic or Formal Analysis? A Reply to Rachel Parker," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 56, pages 475-481, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Moira V. Faul, 2016. "Networks and Power: Why Networks are Hierarchical Not Flat and What Can Be Done About It," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 7(2), pages 185-197, May.
    2. Babette Never, 2011. "Who Drives Change? Comparing the Evolution of Domestic Climate Governance in India and South Africa," Working Papers id:4521, eSocialSciences.
    3. Nochta, Timea & Skelcher, Chris, 2020. "Network governance in low-carbon energy transitions in European cities: A comparative analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    4. Allam, Dina, 2021. "Explaining the persistence of “decentralisation” of education in Egypt," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    5. Irena Valková, 2017. "Centrality in the network of Regional Trade Agreements: Effects on the strategies of the Arctic claimant states," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 20(2), pages 122-143, June.
    6. Mark Goodwin, 2009. "Which Networks Matter in Education Governance? A Reply to Ball's ‘New Philanthropy, New Networks and New Governance in Education’," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 57(3), pages 680-687, October.
    7. Stephen J. Ball, 2008. "New Philanthropy, New Networks and New Governance in Education," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 56(4), pages 747-765, December.
    8. Wiegant, Daniel & Dewulf, Art & Van Zeben, Josephine, 2024. "Alignment mechanisms to effectively govern the sustainable development goals," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    9. McNamara Madeleine W., 2011. "Processes of Cross-Sector Collaboration: A Case Study of the Virginia Coastal Zone Management Program," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 2(2), pages 1-22, November.
    10. Massey, Oliver T., 2011. "A proposed model for the analysis and interpretation of focus groups in evaluation research," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 21-28, February.
    11. Benoît Desmarchelier & Faridah Djellal & Faïz Gallouj, 2018. "Public Service Innovation Networks (PSINs): Collaborating for Innovation and Value Creation," Working Papers halshs-01934275, HAL.
    12. Raul Lejano & Savita Shankar, 2013. "The contextualist turn and schematics of institutional fit: Theory and a case study from Southern India," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 46(1), pages 83-102, March.
    13. Watson, Rosina & Wilson, Hugh N. & Macdonald, Emma K., 2020. "Business-nonprofit engagement in sustainability-oriented innovation: What works for whom and why?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 87-98.
    14. Olsen, Odd Einar & Lindoe, Preben, 2004. "Trailing research based evaluation; phases and roles," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 371-380, November.
    15. Youngcheoul Kang & Nakbum Choi & Seoyong Kim, 2021. "Searching for New Model of Digital Informatics for Human–Computer Interaction: Testing the Institution-Based Technology Acceptance Model (ITAM)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-36, May.
    16. Cricelli, Livio & Mauriello, Roberto & Strazzullo, Serena, 2023. "Preventing open innovation failures: A managerial framework," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    17. Kenny, Tiff-Annie & Fillion, Myriam & MacLean, Jullian & Wesche, Sonia D. & Chan, Hing Man, 2018. "Calories are cheap, nutrients are expensive – The challenge of healthy living in Arctic communities," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 39-54.
    18. Odendaal, Willem A. & Marais, Sandra & Munro, Salla & van Niekerk, Ashley, 2008. "When the trivial becomes meaningful: Reflections on a process evaluation of a home visitation programme in South Africa," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 209-216, May.
    19. Georgina Guillen & Juho Hamari, 2024. "Live and Let Die - Battle Stories of Gamified Sustainable Consumption App Creators," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 55(3), pages 366-390, June.
    20. Hafizh Rafizal Adnan & Achmad Nizar Hidayanto & Sherah Kurnia, 2021. "Citizens’ or Government’s Will? Exploration of Why Indonesia’s Local Governments Adopt Technologies for Open Government," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-27, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:109:y:2025:i:c:s0149718924001241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.