IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/gigawp/174.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Who Drives Change? Comparing the Evolution of Domestic Climate Governance in India and South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Never, Babette

Abstract

This paper compares and contrasts the nature and scope of change in the domestic climate governance of India and South Africa between 2007 and 2010. It uses an actor-centered approach to analyze the drivers of change. An exploratory test of fit shows that the concept of communities of practice captures the trends and actor relations well for the South African case, while more simple networks could be identified in India. Using data from an expert survey and from semi-structured interviews, this paper finds that both countries have generally not yet surpassed the level of second-order change, or double-loop learning. Differences exist for more specific parts of climate governance. Three resulting hypotheses give conditions for the development of either communities of practice or of networks, as conceptualized in formal network analysis. They target (1) the number of participating actors, (2) the size of the scientific landscape and the degree of competition among scientists, and (3) the centrality of a governmental actor with a certain knowledge and attitude within a network.

Suggested Citation

  • Never, Babette, 2011. "Who Drives Change? Comparing the Evolution of Domestic Climate Governance in India and South Africa," GIGA Working Papers 174, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:gigawp:174
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/52408/1/665804598.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ingrid Koch & Coleen Vogel & Zarina Patel, 2007. "Institutional dynamics and climate change adaptation in South Africa," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 12(8), pages 1323-1339, October.
    2. Rachel Parker, 2007. "Networked Governance or Just Networks? Local Governance of the Knowledge Economy in Limerick (Ireland) and Karlskrona (Sweden)," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 55(1), pages 113-132, March.
    3. Emily Tyler, 2010. "Aligning South African energy and climate change mitigation policy," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(5), pages 575-588, September.
    4. Luo, Jar-Der, 2005. "Particularistic Trust and General Trust: A Network Analysis in Chinese Organizations[1]," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(3), pages 437-458, November.
    5. Rachel Parker, 2007. "Networked Governance or Just Networks? Local Governance of the Knowledge Economy in Limerick (Ireland) and Karlskrona (Sweden)," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 55, pages 113-132, March.
    6. Michael Goldblatt, 2010. "Comparison of emissions trading and carbon taxation in South Africa," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(5), pages 511-526, September.
    7. Jar-Der Luo, 2005. "Particularistic Trust and General Trust: A Network Analysis in Chinese Organizations," Management and Organization Review, International Association of Chinese Management Research, vol. 1(3), pages 437-458, November.
    8. Dimitrios C. Christopoulos, 2008. "The Governance of Networks: Heuristic or Formal Analysis? A Reply to Rachel Parker," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 56(2), pages 475-481, June.
    9. Dimitrios C. Christopoulos, 2008. "The Governance of Networks: Heuristic or Formal Analysis? A Reply to Rachel Parker," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 56, pages 475-481, June.
    10. Daniel Z. Levin & Rob Cross, 2004. "The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(11), pages 1477-1490, November.
    11. Hafner-Burton, Emilie M. & Kahler, Miles & Montgomery, Alexander H., 2009. "Network Analysis for International Relations," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 63(3), pages 559-592, July.
    12. Oecd, 2009. "Climate Change and Africa," OECD Journal: General Papers, OECD Publishing, vol. 2009(1), pages 5-35.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mark Goodwin, 2009. "Which Networks Matter in Education Governance? A Reply to Ball's ‘New Philanthropy, New Networks and New Governance in Education’," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 57(3), pages 680-687, October.
    2. Stephen J. Ball, 2008. "New Philanthropy, New Networks and New Governance in Education," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 56(4), pages 747-765, December.
    3. Moira V. Faul, 2016. "Networks and Power: Why Networks are Hierarchical Not Flat and What Can Be Done About It," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 7(2), pages 185-197, May.
    4. Tan, Justin & Yang, Jun & Veliyath, Rajaram, 2009. "Particularistic and system trust among small and medium enterprises: A comparative study in China's transition economy," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 544-557, November.
    5. Hongjuan Zhang & Rong Han & Liang Wang & Runhui Lin, 2021. "Social capital in China: a systematic literature review," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(1), pages 32-77, February.
    6. Hongjuan Zhang & Rong Han & Liang Wang & Runhui Lin, 0. "Social capital in China: a systematic literature review," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 0, pages 1-46.
    7. A. Udayaadithya & Anjula Gurtoo, 2013. "Governing the local networks in Indian agrarian societies—an MAS perspective," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 204-231, June.
    8. Irena Valková, 2017. "Centrality in the network of Regional Trade Agreements: Effects on the strategies of the Arctic claimant states," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 20(2), pages 122-143, June.
    9. Huimin Gu & Tingting (Christina) Zhang & Can Lu & Xiaoxiao Song, 2021. "Assessing Trust and Risk Perceptions in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Study," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(4), pages 1002-1032, June.
    10. Yue Wang & Wenhao Luo & Jing Zhang & Yirong Guo, 2019. "More humility, less counterproductive work behaviors? The role of interpersonal justice and trust," Frontiers of Business Research in China, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    11. Lingnan He & Kaisheng Lai & Zhongxuan Lin & Zhihao Ma, 2018. "Media Exposure and General Trust as Predictors of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder: Ten Years after the 5.12 Wenchuan Earthquake in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, October.
    12. Paul Lehmann & Miriam Brenck & Oliver Gebhardt & Sven Schaller & Elisabeth Süßbauer, 2015. "Barriers and opportunities for urban adaptation planning: analytical framework and evidence from cities in Latin America and Germany," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 75-97, January.
    13. Jar-Der Luo & Meng-Yu Cheng & Tian Zhang, 2016. "Guanxi circle and organizational citizenship behavior: Context of a Chinese workplace," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 649-671, September.
    14. Colin Scott & Ciara Brown, 2010. "Regulatory Capacity and Networked Governance," Working Papers 201043, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
    15. Lulu Zhou & Haiyan Huang & Xiaolin Chen & Feng Tian, 2023. "Functional diversity of top management teams and firm performance in SMEs: a social network perspective," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 259-286, January.
    16. Sheila M. Puffer & Daniel J. McCarthy & Max Boisot, 2010. "Entrepreneurship in Russia and China: The Impact of Formal Institutional Voids," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 34(3), pages 441-467, May.
    17. Helena Tolkki & Arto Haveri & Jenni Airaksinen & Emilia Valkonen, 2011. "Governance in Regional Development—Between Regulation and Self-regulation," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 313-333, December.
    18. Chih-Cheng Lo & Chun-Hsien Wang & Yi-Wen Lin, 2021. "Professional or Interpersonal Trust? Effect of Social Network on the Intention to Undergo Cosmetic Procedures," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, August.
    19. Lo, Alex Y & Mai, Lindsay Qianqing & Lee, Anna Ka-yin & Francesch-Huidobro, Maria & Pei, Qing & Cong, Ren & Chen, Kang, 2018. "Towards network governance? The case of emission trading in Guangdong, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 538-548.
    20. Zhichao Li & Xihan Tan, 2018. "Revitalization of Trust in Local Government after Wenchuan Earthquake: Constraints and Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:gigawp:174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dueiide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.