IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i11p4030-d180284.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revitalization of Trust in Local Government after Wenchuan Earthquake: Constraints and Strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Zhichao Li

    (School of Political Science and Public Administration, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 201620, China)

  • Xihan Tan

    (School of Public Administration, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China)

Abstract

Government trust is an important manifestation of the legitimacy of government, which can reduce the cost of recovery policy implementation and improve the efficiency of reconstruction after natural hazards. Local government is the main force of post-disaster reconstruction in China. The villagers’ trust in local government plays an important role in post-disaster reconstruction. Therefore, enhancing the villagers’ trust in local government will greatly benefit the resilience of post-disaster reconstruction and the sustainable development of the disaster area. Through analyzing the data collected from a three-year (2009–2012) follow-up survey in Wenchuan after it was struck by an earthquake, we found that villagers’ trust toward the local government witnessed a significant decline. Low fairness in policy implementation, dense networks, and particularistic trust were the constraints that hindered the revitalization of trust in the local government. However, the economic improvement had no impact on the “trust in local government”. These results suggest that post-disaster recovery should involve more than the reconstruction of the economic performance, such as the fairness of policy implementation and the relief of negative effects of villagers’ social networks. Only when considering all of these factors will the sustainability of trust in local government be promoted and the reconstruction efficiency be enhanced in the process of disaster recovery.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhichao Li & Xihan Tan, 2018. "Revitalization of Trust in Local Government after Wenchuan Earthquake: Constraints and Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:11:p:4030-:d:180284
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/11/4030/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/11/4030/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sung Hoon Kang & Mark Skidmore, 2018. "The Effects of Natural Disasters on Social Trust: Evidence from South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-16, August.
    2. Citrin, Jack, 1974. "Comment: The Political Relevance of Trust in Government," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 68(3), pages 973-988, September.
    3. Edward L. Glaeser & Bruce I. Sacerdote & Jose A. Scheinkman, 2003. "The Social Multiplier," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 1(2-3), pages 345-353, 04/05.
    4. Xun Gong & Shenggang Yang & Min Zhang, 2017. "Not Only Health: Environmental Pollution Disasters and Political Trust," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-28, April.
    5. Jar-Der Luo, 2005. "Particularistic Trust and General Trust: A Network Analysis in Chinese Organizations," Management and Organization Review, International Association of Chinese Management Research, vol. 1(3), pages 437-458, November.
    6. Lifang Huang & Lin Wang & Jie Song, 2018. "Post-Disaster Business Recovery and Sustainable Development: A Study of 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-22, February.
    7. Octavio Rojas & María Zamorano & Katia Saez & Carolina Rojas & Claudio Vega & Loretto Arriagada & Corina Basnou, 2017. "Social Perception of Ecosystem Services in a Coastal Wetland Post-Earthquake: A Case Study in Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-17, October.
    8. Luo, Jar-Der, 2005. "Particularistic Trust and General Trust: A Network Analysis in Chinese Organizations[1]," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(3), pages 437-458, November.
    9. Hetherington, Marc J., 1998. "The Political Relevance of Political Trust," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 92(4), pages 791-808, December.
    10. Easton, David, 1975. "A Re-assessment of the Concept of Political Support," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(4), pages 435-457, October.
    11. Yi Peng & Xuewen Li & Li Huang & Shuli Jiang & Yelin Xu & Yani Lai, 2018. "Risks of Developing Concentrated Rural Settlement after the Wenchuan Earthquake in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    12. Jianwen Wei & Yang Han, 2018. "Pre-Disaster Social Capital and Disaster Recovery in Wenchuan Earthquake-Stricken Rural Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhichao Li & Xihan Tan, 2019. "Disaster-Recovery Social Capital and Community Participation in Earthquake-Stricken Ya’an Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Kuiyun Zhi & Qiurong Tan & Si Chen & Yongjin Chen & Xiaoqin Wu & Chenkai Xue & Anbang Song, 2022. "How Does Social Security Fairness Predict Trust in Government? The Serial Mediation Effects of Social Security Satisfaction and Life Satisfaction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-14, June.
    3. Jeongmin Oh & Daewoong Lee, 2022. "Role of trust in government and collaboration in building disaster resilience," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 103(7), pages 1647-1658, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eri Bertsou, 2019. "Political Distrust and its Discontents: Exploring the Meaning, Expression and Significance of Political Distrust," Societies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-18, October.
    2. Jaeyoung Lim & Kuk-Kyoung Moon, 2021. "Can Political Trust Weaken the Relationship between Perceived Environmental Threats and Perceived Nuclear Threats? Evidence from South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-13, September.
    3. Nunkoo, Robin & Smith, Stephen L.J., 2013. "Political economy of tourism: Trust in government actors, political support, and their determinants," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 120-132.
    4. Anna Kern, 2017. "The Effect of Direct Democratic Participation on Citizens’ Political Attitudes in Switzerland: The Difference between Availability and Use," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(2), pages 16-26.
    5. Newton, Kenneth, 2005. "Support for democracy: Social capital, civil society and political performance," Discussion Papers, Research Group Civil Society, Citizenship and Political Mobilization in Europe SP IV 2005-402, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    6. Yiluyi Zeng, 2024. "Discounted prices, discounted respect? The influence of cultural norms on freelance contract relations in England and Taiwan," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 30(2), pages 179-200, June.
    7. Guanghua Han & Simin Yan, 2019. "Does Food Safety Risk Perception Affect the Public’s Trust in Their Government? An Empirical Study on a National Survey in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-15, May.
    8. Huimin Gu & Tingting (Christina) Zhang & Can Lu & Xiaoxiao Song, 2021. "Assessing Trust and Risk Perceptions in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Study," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(4), pages 1002-1032, June.
    9. Mackay, Robert & Mavisakalyan, Astghik & Tarverdi, Yashar, 2024. "Trust a few: Natural disasters and the disruption of trust in Africa," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    10. Ying Liang, 2016. "Trust in Chinese Government and Quality of Life (QOL) of Sichuan Earthquake Survivors: Does Trust in Government Help to Promote QOL?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 127(2), pages 541-564, June.
    11. Lingnan He & Kaisheng Lai & Zhongxuan Lin & Zhihao Ma, 2018. "Media Exposure and General Trust as Predictors of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder: Ten Years after the 5.12 Wenchuan Earthquake in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, October.
    12. Zuo, Bing & Gursoy, Dogan & Wall, Geoffrey, 2017. "Residents’ support for red tourism in China: The moderating effect of central government," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 51-63.
    13. Hanyu Xiao & Ting Gong & Chilik Yu & Wen-Jong Juang & Baishun Yuan, 2020. "Citizens’ Confidence in Government Control of Corruption: An Empirical Analysis," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 152(3), pages 877-897, December.
    14. Faisal Z. Ahmed, 2017. "Remittances and incumbency: Theory and evidence," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 22-47, March.
    15. Erica Poma & Barbara Pistoresi, 2024. "Government Support Measures, Trust in Institutions and Effects on Satisfaction with Democracy During the COVID-19 Outbreak," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 66(2), pages 355-387, June.
    16. Babette Never, 2011. "Who Drives Change? Comparing the Evolution of Domestic Climate Governance in India and South Africa," Working Papers id:4521, eSocialSciences.
    17. Yuanyuan Xu & Cheng Fu & Wen Tu & Fujun Zhou, 2024. "The Role of the Informal Institution: How Does It Shape the Trust Relationship Between Government and Social Organizations in China?," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, May.
    18. Christine Huang, Yi-Hui & Lu, Yuanhang & Kao, Lang & Ying Choy, Christine Hiu & Chang, Yu-tzung, 2020. "Mainframes and mandarins: The impact of internet use on institutional trust in East Asia," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(2).
    19. Ahlerup, Pelle & Sundström, Aksel & Jagers, Sverker C & Sjöstedt, Martin, 2023. "Drought and Political Trust," Working Papers in Economics 832, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.
    20. Mujtaba Isani & Bernd Schlipphak, 2017. "In the European Union we trust: European Muslim attitudes toward the European Union," European Union Politics, , vol. 18(4), pages 658-677, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:11:p:4030-:d:180284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.