IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v257y2022ics0360544222016486.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-period optimal infrastructure planning of natural gas pipeline network system integrating flowrate allocation

Author

Listed:
  • Wen, Kai
  • Lu, Yangfan
  • Lu, Meitong
  • Zhang, Wenwei
  • Zhu, Ming
  • Qiao, Dan
  • Meng, Fanpeng
  • Zhang, Jing
  • Gong, Jing
  • Hong, Bingyuan

Abstract

The purpose of flow allocation is to give full play to the transmission capacity of the pipeline network system and complete the transportation task with less operation cost. When the flow allocation cannot balance the changes of upstream gas source and downstream demand, the pipeline network system needs to be planned and constructed. Therefore, this paper aims to propose an optimization method allowing the simultaneous optimization of infrastructure planning and the flowrate allocation in each decide cycle by explicit consideration of the corresponding operational constraints. The constraints include the limit of gas supply and user demand, the transmission capacity of pipeline network, the balance of node flowrate, and the capacity of gas storage. The injection, storage and production capacity of gas storage is considered. A case study including multi scene settings shows the feasibility of the proposed method. The results show that compared with the annual scale, the half-year scale can better consider the peak regulation effect of gas storage, and the utilization rate of gas storage is improved by 12.88%. Multiple options that allow for both expansion and new pipelines are more economical than a single option. Specifically, the total cost under multi-option planning is 8.24% lower than only expansion is allowed, and 8.32% lower than only new construction is allowed. In addition, the sensitivity analysis is carried out to study the impact of the unit pipeline transmission cost, unit construction cost and lead time of pipeline on the pipeline construction scheme. The improvement of gas storage utilization rate, gas storage operation and pipeline network transmission capacity verify that the proposed planning model has the ability to improve the system operation efficiency and reduce the total cost.

Suggested Citation

  • Wen, Kai & Lu, Yangfan & Lu, Meitong & Zhang, Wenwei & Zhu, Ming & Qiao, Dan & Meng, Fanpeng & Zhang, Jing & Gong, Jing & Hong, Bingyuan, 2022. "Multi-period optimal infrastructure planning of natural gas pipeline network system integrating flowrate allocation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:257:y:2022:i:c:s0360544222016486
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.124745
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544222016486
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124745?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hong, Bingyuan & Li, Xiaoping & Song, Shangfei & Chen, Shilin & Zhao, Changlong & Gong, Jing, 2020. "Optimal planning and modular infrastructure dynamic allocation for shale gas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    2. Liu, Dawei & Xu, Hang, 2021. "A rational policy decision or political deal? A multiple streams' examination of the Russia-China natural gas pipeline," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(PB).
    3. Tan, Siah Hong & Barton, Paul I., 2015. "Optimal dynamic allocation of mobile plants to monetize associated or stranded natural gas, part I: Bakken shale play case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 1581-1594.
    4. Kabirian, Alireza & Hemmati, Mohammad Reza, 2007. "A strategic planning model for natural gas transmission networks," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 5656-5670, November.
    5. Chen, Qian & Zuo, Lili & Wu, Changchun & Li, Yun & Hua, Kaixun & Mehrtash, Mahdi & Cao, Yankai, 2022. "Optimization of compressor standby schemes for gas transmission pipeline systems based on gas delivery reliability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    6. Chaudry, Modassar & Jenkins, Nick & Qadrdan, Meysam & Wu, Jianzhong, 2014. "Combined gas and electricity network expansion planning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1171-1187.
    7. Lin, Jing & Mou, Dunguo, 2021. "Analysis of the optimal spatial distribution of natural gas under ‘transition from coal to gas’ in China," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    8. Su, Huai & Chi, Lixun & Zio, Enrico & Li, Zhenlin & Fan, Lin & Yang, Zhe & Liu, Zhe & Zhang, Jinjun, 2021. "An integrated, systematic data-driven supply-demand side management method for smart integrated energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    9. Yu, Weichao & Gong, Jing & Song, Shangfei & Huang, Weihe & Li, Yichen & Zhang, Jie & Hong, Bingyuan & Zhang, Ye & Wen, Kai & Duan, Xu, 2019. "Gas supply reliability analysis of a natural gas pipeline system considering the effects of underground gas storages," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 1-1.
    10. Hamedi, Maryam & Zanjirani Farahani, Reza & Husseini, Mohammad Moattar & Esmaeilian, Gholam Reza, 2009. "A distribution planning model for natural gas supply chain: A case study," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 799-812, March.
    11. Mikolajková, Markéta & Haikarainen, Carl & Saxén, Henrik & Pettersson, Frank, 2017. "Optimization of a natural gas distribution network with potential future extensions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 848-859.
    12. Yu, Weichao & Huang, Weihe & Wen, Yunhao & Li, Yichen & Liu, Hongfei & Wen, Kai & Gong, Jing & Lu, Yanan, 2021. "An integrated gas supply reliability evaluation method of the large-scale and complex natural gas pipeline network based on demand-side analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    13. Jingkuan Han & Yingjun Xu & Dingzhi Liu & Yanfang Zhao & Zhongde Zhao & Shuhui Zhou & Tianhu Deng & Mengying Xue & Junchi Ye & Zuo-Jun Max Shen, 2019. "Operations Research Enables Better Planning of Natural Gas Pipelines," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 49(1), pages 23-39, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yin, Xiong & Wen, Kai & Huang, Weihe & Luo, Yinwei & Ding, Yi & Gong, Jing & Gao, Jianfeng & Hong, Bingyuan, 2023. "A high-accuracy online transient simulation framework of natural gas pipeline network by integrating physics-based and data-driven methods," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 333(C).
    2. Wang, Guotao & Zhao, Wei & Qiu, Rui & Liao, Qi & Lin, Zhenjia & Wang, Chang & Zhang, Haoran, 2023. "Operational optimization of large-scale thermal constrained natural gas pipeline networks: A novel iterative decomposition approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Üster, Halit & Dilaveroğlu, Şebnem, 2014. "Optimization for design and operation of natural gas transmission networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 56-69.
    2. Zarei, Javad & Amin-Naseri, Mohammad Reza, 2019. "An integrated optimization model for natural gas supply chain," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 1114-1130.
    3. Wang, Guotao & Zhao, Wei & Qiu, Rui & Liao, Qi & Lin, Zhenjia & Wang, Chang & Zhang, Haoran, 2023. "Operational optimization of large-scale thermal constrained natural gas pipeline networks: A novel iterative decomposition approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    4. Farrokhifar, Meisam & Nie, Yinghui & Pozo, David, 2020. "Energy systems planning: A survey on models for integrated power and natural gas networks coordination," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    5. Fan, Di & Gong, Jing & Zhang, Shengnan & Shi, Guoyun & Kang, Qi & Xiao, Yaqi & Wu, Changchun, 2021. "A transient composition tracking method for natural gas pipe networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PA).
    6. Emenike, Scholastica N. & Falcone, Gioia, 2020. "A review on energy supply chain resilience through optimization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    7. Yang, Kai & Hou, Lei & Man, Jianfeng & Yu, Qiaoyan & Li, Yu & Zhang, Xinru & Liu, Jiaquan, 2023. "Supply reliability analysis of natural gas pipeline network based on demand-side economic loss risk," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    8. Hong, Bingyuan & Cui, Xuemeng & Wang, Bohong & Fan, Di & Li, Xiaoping & Gong, Jing, 2022. "Long-term dynamic allocation and maintenance planning of modular equipment to enhance gas field production flexibility," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    9. Hong, Bingyuan & Li, Xiaoping & Song, Shangfei & Chen, Shilin & Zhao, Changlong & Gong, Jing, 2020. "Optimal planning and modular infrastructure dynamic allocation for shale gas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    10. Psarras, John, 2016. "Multicriteria decision support to evaluate potential long-term natural gas supply alternatives: The case of GreeceAuthor-Name: Androulaki, Stella," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(3), pages 791-810.
    11. Devine, Mel T. & Russo, Marianna, 2019. "Liquefied natural gas and gas storage valuation: Lessons from the integrated Irish and UK markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 1389-1406.
    12. Olivier Massol, 2011. "A Cost Function for the Natural Gas Transmission Industry: Further Considerations," The Engineering Economist, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(2), pages 95-122.
    13. Kang-Min Kim & Gyu-Bo Kim & Byoung-Hwa Lee & Yoon-Ho Bae & Chung-Hwan Jeon, 2021. "CFD Evaluation of Heat Transfer and NOx Emissions When Converting a Tangentially Fired Coal Boiler to Use Methane," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    14. Bingyuan Hong & Xiaoping Li & Yanbo Li & Yu Li & Yafeng Yu & Yumo Wang & Jing Gong & Dihui Ai, 2021. "Numerical Simulation of Elbow Erosion in Shale Gas Fields under Gas-Solid Two-Phase Flow," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, June.
    15. Davor Dujak, 2017. "Mapping Of Natural Gas Supply Chains: Literature Review," Business Logistics in Modern Management, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics, Croatia, vol. 17, pages 293-309.
    16. Cheng, Yaohua & Zhang, Ning & Kirschen, Daniel S. & Huang, Wujing & Kang, Chongqing, 2020. "Planning multiple energy systems for low-carbon districts with high penetration of renewable energy: An empirical study in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    17. Shuguang Liu & Jiayi Wang & Yin Long, 2023. "Research into the Spatiotemporal Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Technological Innovation in China’s Natural Gas Industry from the Perspective of Energy Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-34, April.
    18. Robertas Alzbutas & Tomas Iešmantas, 2022. "Stochastic Simulation of Flow Rate and Power Consumption Considering the Uncertainty of Pipeline Cracking Rate and Time-Dependent Topology of a Natural Gas Transmission Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-12, June.
    19. Yu, Weichao & Huang, Weihe & Wen, Kai & Zhang, Jie & Liu, Hongfei & Wang, Kun & Gong, Jing & Qu, Chunxu, 2021. "Subset simulation-based reliability analysis of the corroding natural gas pipeline," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    20. Farahani, Mohsen & Rahmani, Donya, 2017. "Production and distribution planning in petroleum supply chains regarding the impacts of gas injection and swap," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 991-1003.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:257:y:2022:i:c:s0360544222016486. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.