IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v254y2022ipas0360544222012865.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the current perceived cost of ownership for buses and trucks in China

Author

Listed:
  • Hao, Xu
  • Ou, Shiqi
  • Lin, Zhenhong
  • He, Xin
  • Bouchard, Jessey
  • Wang, Hewu
  • Li, Liguo

Abstract

Decarbonizing commercial vehicles, including buses, trucks, and special purpose vehicles, is essential for China to achieve its carbon neutrality target by 2060. However, understanding the adoption barriers of alternative fuel technologies for commercial vehicles has largely been limited to the total cost of ownership approach that mainly considers tangible costs. This study proposes a perceived cost of ownership (PCO) model, which monetizes both tangible and implicit costs, including charging annoyance for buses and trucks by size and classification under different use scenarios. In the case study for China's current bus and truck market, the PCO of alternative fuel technologies, such as battery electric vehicles (BEVs) and fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEVs) are 27%–129% and 31%–86% higher than the most economically competitive powertrains – the compressed natural/liquefied petroleum gas technology and hybrid electric technology. BEVs could be cost-effective in the mini/midsize bus segment or in the daily short-distance driving scenario, and FCEVs could firstly be deployed in cities with a low hydrogen price. Though the implicit costs caused by range anxiety and charging annoyance account for at least 27% of BEV's PCO, making BEV uncompetitive, the battery swapping technique could reduce the implicit cost and overall cash outflow for BEV owners.

Suggested Citation

  • Hao, Xu & Ou, Shiqi & Lin, Zhenhong & He, Xin & Bouchard, Jessey & Wang, Hewu & Li, Liguo, 2022. "Evaluating the current perceived cost of ownership for buses and trucks in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:254:y:2022:i:pa:s0360544222012865
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.124383
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544222012865
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124383?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Figenbaum, Erik, 2018. "Can battery electric light commercial vehicles work for craftsmen and service enterprises?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 58-72.
    2. Hao, Xu & Lin, Zhenhong & Wang, Hewu & Ou, Shiqi & Ouyang, Minggao, 2020. "Range cost-effectiveness of plug-in electric vehicle for heterogeneous consumers: An expanded total ownership cost approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    3. Kobberling, Veronika & Wakker, Peter P., 2005. "An index of loss aversion," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 119-131, May.
    4. Scorrano, Mariangela & Danielis, Romeo & Giansoldati, Marco, 2021. "Electric light commercial vehicles for a cleaner urban goods distribution. Are they cost competitive?," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    5. Davis, Brian A. & Figliozzi, Miguel A., 2013. "A methodology to evaluate the competitiveness of electric delivery trucks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 8-23.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Mingyang & Tang, Jinjun, 2023. "Simulation-based optimization considering energy consumption for assisted station locations to enhance flex-route transit," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    2. Chen, Xiaoyuan & Pang, Zhou & Jiang, Shan & Zhang, Mingshun & Feng, Juan & Fu, Lin & Shen, Boyang, 2023. "A novel LH2/GH2/battery multi-energy vehicle supply station using 100% local wind energy: Technical, economic and environmental perspectives," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    3. Jahangir Samet, Mehdi & Liimatainen, Heikki & Pihlatie, Mikko & van Vliet, Oscar Patrick René, 2024. "Levelized cost of driving for medium and heavy-duty battery electric trucks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 361(C).
    4. Wang, Hang & Hu, Yige & Jiang, Feng & Ling, Xiang, 2022. "Thermal performance of industrial-grade CH3COONa·3H2O-based composite phase change materials in a plate heat storage unit," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gil Ribeiro, Carolina & Silveira, Semida, 2024. "The impact of financial incentives on the total cost of ownership of electric light commercial vehicles in EU countries," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    2. Heiko Karle & Georg Kirchsteiger & Martin Peitz, 2015. "Loss Aversion and Consumption Choice: Theory and Experimental Evidence," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 7(2), pages 101-120, May.
    3. Martín Egozcue & Sébastien Massoni & Wing-Keung Wong & RiÄ ardas Zitikis, 2012. "Integration-segregation decisions under general value functions: "Create your own bundle — choose 1, 2, or all 3!"," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 12057, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    4. Botond Kőszegi & Matthew Rabin, 2006. "A Model of Reference-Dependent Preferences," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 121(4), pages 1133-1165.
    5. Bin Zou, 2017. "Optimal Investment In Hedge Funds Under Loss Aversion," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(03), pages 1-32, May.
    6. Tharsis Teoh & Oliver Kunze & Chee-Chong Teo & Yiik Diew Wong, 2018. "Decarbonisation of Urban Freight Transport Using Electric Vehicles and Opportunity Charging," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, September.
    7. Eric Johnson & Simon Gaechter & Andreas Herrmann, 2006. "Exploring the Nature of Loss Aversion," Discussion Papers 2006-02, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    8. Roel M. Post & Paul Buijs & Michiel A. J. uit het Broek & Jose A. Lopez Alvarez & Nick B. Szirbik & Iris F. A. Vis, 2018. "A solution approach for deriving alternative fuel station infrastructure requirements," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 592-607, September.
    9. Luís Santos-Pinto & Adrian Bruhin & José Mata & Thomas Åstebro, 2015. "Detecting heterogeneous risk attitudes with mixed gambles," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 79(4), pages 573-600, December.
    10. Enrico G. De Giorgi & Thierry Post, 2011. "Loss Aversion with a State-Dependent Reference Point," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(6), pages 1094-1110, June.
    11. Michele Costola & Massimiliano Caporin, 2016. "Rational Learning For Risk-Averse Investors By Conditioning On Behavioral Choices," Annals of Financial Economics (AFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 11(01), pages 1-26, March.
    12. Ulrich Schmidt & Horst Zank, 2008. "Risk Aversion in Cumulative Prospect Theory," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(1), pages 208-216, January.
    13. Tannaz Jahaniaghdam & Amir Reza Mamdoohi & Salman Aghidi Kheyrabadi & Mehdi Mehryar & Francesco Ciari, 2023. "Preferences for Alternative Fuel Trucks among International Transport Companies," World, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-21, November.
    14. Schunk, Daniel, 2009. "Behavioral heterogeneity in dynamic search situations: Theory and experimental evidence," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 33(9), pages 1719-1738, September.
    15. Julius Pahlke & Sebastian Strasser & Ferdinand Vieider, 2015. "Responsibility effects in decision making under risk," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 125-146, October.
    16. Mohammed Abdellaoui & Han Bleichrodt & Hilda Kammoun, 2013. "Do financial professionals behave according to prospect theory? An experimental study," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 74(3), pages 411-429, March.
    17. Liimatainen, Heikki & van Vliet, Oscar & Aplyn, David, 2019. "The potential of electric trucks – An international commodity-level analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 804-814.
    18. Roberti, R. & Wen, M., 2016. "The Electric Traveling Salesman Problem with Time Windows," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 32-52.
    19. Alexander K. Koch & Julia Nafziger, 2019. "Correlates of Narrow Bracketing," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 121(4), pages 1441-1472, October.
    20. Qian Wu & Monique Vanerum & Anouk Agten & Andrés Christiansen & Frank Vandenabeele & Jean-Michel Rigo & Rianne Janssen, 2021. "Certainty-Based Marking on Multiple-Choice Items: Psychometrics Meets Decision Theory," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(2), pages 518-543, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:254:y:2022:i:pa:s0360544222012865. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.