IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v227y2021ics036054422100760x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conceptual design, exergoeconomic analysis and multi-objective optimization for a novel integration of biomass-fueled power plant with MCFC-cryogenic CO2 separation unit for low-carbon power production

Author

Listed:
  • Akrami, Ehsan
  • Ameri, Mohammad
  • Rocco, Matteo V.

Abstract

In the present study, the low-Carbon power production concept is proposed to introduce a novel integration. In the Bio-Energy Carbon Capture and Storage framework, Municipal Solid Waste is regarded as the main fuel for the system. To administer the analysis, a combination of a downdraft gasifier, a directly fired-gas turbine, Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell, Organic Rankine Cycle, and cryogenic CO2 separation unit is considered. The proposed integration is investigated from themodynamic, exergoeconomic, and environmental points of view. The multi-objective optimization is also conducted to minimize the CO2 emission and cost of electricity besides maximizing the overall exergy efficiency. By applying the optimum values for decision parameters, exergetic and economic results indicate that the combustion chamber and downdraft gasifier are identified as the component with maximum exergy destruction rate (17.44% and 14.59% of the total, respectively) due to high combustion and chemical reactions inefficiencies. Also, the net energy and exergy efficiency, cost of electricity, and specific CO2 emission result as 51.65%, 45.98%, 80.59 USD/MWh, and 101.20 kgCO2/kWh for the proposed system, respectively. The optimization results reveal that the CO2 emission was reduced by 33%. However, the exergy efficiency and cost of electricity will increase by 3% and 1.6%, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Akrami, Ehsan & Ameri, Mohammad & Rocco, Matteo V., 2021. "Conceptual design, exergoeconomic analysis and multi-objective optimization for a novel integration of biomass-fueled power plant with MCFC-cryogenic CO2 separation unit for low-carbon power productio," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:227:y:2021:i:c:s036054422100760x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.120511
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036054422100760X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120511?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rafiq, Shuddhasattwa & Salim, Ruhul & Nielsen, Ingrid, 2016. "Urbanization, openness, emissions, and energy intensity: A study of increasingly urbanized emerging economies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 20-28.
    2. Rubin, Edward S. & Yeh, Sonia & Antes, Matt & Berkenpas, Michael & Davison, John, 2007. "Use of experience curves to estimate the future cost of power plants with CO2 capture," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt46x6h0n0, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    3. Campanari, Stefano & Manzolini, Giampaolo & Chiesa, Paolo, 2013. "Using MCFC for high efficiency CO2 capture from natural gas combined cycles: Comparison of internal and external reforming," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 772-783.
    4. Casas Ledón, Yannay & González, Patricia & Concha, Scarlett & Zaror, Claudio A. & Arteaga-Pérez, Luis E., 2016. "Exergoeconomic valuation of a waste-based integrated combined cycle (WICC) for heat and power production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 239-252.
    5. Bhoi, Prakashbhai R. & Huhnke, Raymond L. & Kumar, Ajay & Indrawan, Natarianto & Thapa, Sunil, 2018. "Co-gasification of municipal solid waste and biomass in a commercial scale downdraft gasifier," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 513-518.
    6. Ahmadi, Mohammad H. & Jokar, Mohammad Ali & Ming, Tingzhen & Feidt, Michel & Pourfayaz, Fathollah & Astaraei, Fatemeh Razi, 2018. "Multi-objective performance optimization of irreversible molten carbonate fuel cell–Braysson heat engine and thermodynamic analysis with ecological objective approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 707-722.
    7. Sadeghi, M. & Mehr, A.S. & Zar, M. & Santarelli, M., 2018. "Multi-objective optimization of a novel syngas fed SOFC power plant using a downdraft gasifier," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 16-31.
    8. La Villetta, M. & Costa, M. & Massarotti, N., 2017. "Modelling approaches to biomass gasification: A review with emphasis on the stoichiometric method," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 71-88.
    9. Tungalag, Azjargal & Lee, BongJu & Yadav, Manoj & Akande, Olugbenga, 2020. "Yield prediction of MSW gasification including minor species through ASPEN plus simulation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    10. Tang, Yuanjun & Dong, Jun & Li, Guoneng & Zheng, Youqu & Chi, Yong & Nzihou, Ange & Weiss-Hortala, Elsa & Ye, Chao, 2020. "Environmental and exergetic life cycle assessment of incineration- and gasification-based waste to energy systems in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    11. Campanari, S. & Chiesa, P. & Manzolini, G. & Bedogni, S., 2014. "Economic analysis of CO2 capture from natural gas combined cycles using Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 562-573.
    12. Razmi, Amir Reza & Arabkoohsar, Ahmad & Nami, Hossein, 2020. "Thermoeconomic analysis and multi-objective optimization of a novel hybrid absorption/recompression refrigeration system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    13. Habibollahzade, Ali & Gholamian, Ehsan & Behzadi, Amirmohammad, 2019. "Multi-objective optimization and comparative performance analysis of hybrid biomass-based solid oxide fuel cell/solid oxide electrolyzer cell/gas turbine using different gasification agents," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233, pages 985-1002.
    14. Behzadi, Amirmohammad & Gholamian, Ehsan & Houshfar, Ehsan & Habibollahzade, Ali, 2018. "Multi-objective optimization and exergoeconomic analysis of waste heat recovery from Tehran's waste-to-energy plant integrated with an ORC unit," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 1055-1068.
    15. Athari, Hassan & Soltani, Saeed & Seyed Mahmoudi, Seyed Mohammad & Rosen, Marc A. & Morosuk, Tatiana, 2014. "Exergoeconomic analysis of a biomass post-firing combined-cycle power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 553-561.
    16. Indrawan, Natarianto & Thapa, Sunil & Bhoi, Prakashbhai R. & Huhnke, Raymond L. & Kumar, Ajay, 2018. "Electricity power generation from co-gasification of municipal solid wastes and biomass: Generation and emission performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 764-775.
    17. Haghighat Mamaghani, Alireza & Najafi, Behzad & Shirazi, Ali & Rinaldi, Fabio, 2015. "4E analysis and multi-objective optimization of an integrated MCFC (molten carbonate fuel cell) and ORC (organic Rankine cycle) system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 650-663.
    18. Ahmadi, Pouria & Dincer, Ibrahim & Rosen, Marc A., 2011. "Exergy, exergoeconomic and environmental analyses and evolutionary algorithm based multi-objective optimization of combined cycle power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 5886-5898.
    19. Davison, John, 2007. "Performance and costs of power plants with capture and storage of CO2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1163-1176.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Roy, Dibyendu & Samanta, Samiran & Roy, Sumit & Smallbone, Andrew & Paul Roskilly, Anthony, 2023. "Fuel cell integrated carbon negative power generation from biomass," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 331(C).
    2. Li, Hui & Eghbalian, Nasrin, 2021. "Numerical studies of effect of integrated through-plane array flow field on novel PEFC performance using BWO algorithm under uncertainties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    3. Jing Bian & Liqiang Duan & Yongping Yang, 2023. "Simulation and Economic Investigation of CO 2 Separation from Gas Turbine Exhaust Gas by Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell with Exhaust Gas Recirculation and Selective Exhaust Gas Recirculation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-21, April.
    4. Soltanian, Salman & Kalogirou, Soteris A. & Ranjbari, Meisam & Amiri, Hamid & Mahian, Omid & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Jafary, Tahereh & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Gupta, Vijai Kumar & Aghaei, Siavash & Pe, 2022. "Exergetic sustainability analysis of municipal solid waste treatment systems: A systematic critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    5. Bian, Jing & Zhang, Hanfei & Duan, Liqiang & Desideri, Umberto & Yang, Yongping, 2022. "Study of an integrated gas turbine -Molten carbonate fuel cell-organic Rankine cycle system with CO2 recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    6. Chen, Shiyi & Zhou, Nan & Wu, Mudi & Chen, Shubo & Xiang, Wenguo, 2022. "Integration of molten carbonate fuel cell and chemical looping air separation for high-efficient power generation and CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Soltanian, Salman & Kalogirou, Soteris A. & Ranjbari, Meisam & Amiri, Hamid & Mahian, Omid & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Jafary, Tahereh & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Gupta, Vijai Kumar & Aghaei, Siavash & Pe, 2022. "Exergetic sustainability analysis of municipal solid waste treatment systems: A systematic critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    2. Bahram Ghorbani, 2021. "Development of an Integrated Structure for the Tri-Generation of Power, Liquid Carbon Dioxide, and Medium Pressure Steam Using a Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell, a Dual Pressure Linde-Hampson Liquefaction ," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Chen, Heng & Li, Jiarui & Li, Tongyu & Xu, Gang & Jin, Xi & Wang, Min & Liu, Tong, 2022. "Performance assessment of a novel medical-waste-to-energy design based on plasma gasification and integrated with a municipal solid waste incineration plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    4. Upadhyay, Darshit S. & Sakhiya, Anil Kumar & Panchal, Krunal & Patel, Amar H. & Patel, Rajesh N., 2019. "Effect of equivalence ratio on the performance of the downdraft gasifier – An experimental and modelling approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 833-846.
    5. Pan, Peiyuan & Peng, Weike & Li, Jiarui & Chen, Heng & Xu, Gang & Liu, Tong, 2022. "Design and evaluation of a conceptual waste-to-energy approach integrating plasma waste gasification with coal-fired power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PC).
    6. Lai, N.Y.G. & Yap, E.H. & Lee, C.W., 2011. "Viability of CCS: A broad-based assessment for Malaysia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(8), pages 3608-3616.
    7. Wang, Zhen & Duan, Liqiang & Zhang, Zuxian, 2022. "Multi-objective optimization of gas turbine combined cycle system considering environmental damage cost of pollution emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    8. Mariyam, Sabah & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Al-Ansari, Tareq & Mackey, Hamish. R & McKay, Gordon, 2022. "A critical review on co-gasification and co-pyrolysis for gas production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    9. Wu Haibo & Liu Zhaohui, 2018. "Economic research relating to a 200 MWe oxy‐fuel combustion power plant," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 8(5), pages 911-919, October.
    10. Natarianto Indrawan & Betty Simkins & Ajay Kumar & Raymond L. Huhnke, 2020. "Economics of Distributed Power Generation via Gasification of Biomass and Municipal Solid Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-18, July.
    11. López, R. & Menéndez, M. & Fernández, C. & Bernardo-Sánchez, A., 2018. "The effects of scale-up and coal-biomass blending on supercritical coal oxy-combustion power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 571-584.
    12. Frangopoulos, Christos A., 2018. "Recent developments and trends in optimization of energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1011-1020.
    13. Habibollahzade, Ali & Gholamian, Ehsan & Behzadi, Amirmohammad, 2019. "Multi-objective optimization and comparative performance analysis of hybrid biomass-based solid oxide fuel cell/solid oxide electrolyzer cell/gas turbine using different gasification agents," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233, pages 985-1002.
    14. Habibollahzade, Ali, 2019. "Employing photovoltaic/thermal panels as a solar chimney roof: 3E analyses and multi-objective optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 118-130.
    15. Habibollahzade, Ali & Rosen, Marc A., 2021. "Syngas-fueled solid oxide fuel cell functionality improvement through appropriate feedstock selection and multi-criteria optimization using Air/O2-enriched-air gasification agents," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    16. Fazil, A. & Kumar, Sandeep & Mahajani, Sanjay M., 2023. "Gasification and Co-gasification of paper-rich, high-ash refuse-derived fuel in downdraft gasifier," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PA).
    17. Ali Eliasu & Nana Sarfo Agyemang Derkyi & Samuel Gyamfi, 2022. "Techno-Economic Analysis of Municipal Solid Waste Gasification for Electricity Generation," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(1), pages 342-348.
    18. Fan, Jing-Li & Li, Zezheng & Li, Kai & Zhang, Xian, 2022. "Modelling plant-level abatement costs and effects of incentive policies for coal-fired power generation retrofitted with CCUS," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    19. Bhoi, P.R. & Ouedraogo, A.S. & Soloiu, V. & Quirino, R., 2020. "Recent advances on catalysts for improving hydrocarbon compounds in bio-oil of biomass catalytic pyrolysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    20. Yang, Qingchun & Qian, Yu & Kraslawski, Andrzej & Zhou, Huairong & Yang, Siyu, 2016. "Framework for advanced exergoeconomic performance analysis and optimization of an oil shale retorting process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 62-76.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:227:y:2021:i:c:s036054422100760x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.