IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v65y2014icp270-274.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Subsidy modes, waste cooking oil and biofuel: Policy effectiveness and sustainable supply chains in China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Huiming
  • Li, Lianshui
  • Zhou, Peng
  • Hou, Jianmin
  • Qiu, Yueming

Abstract

Many countries are concerned with the waste-to-energy for economic development and societal welfare. This paper constructs a dynamic game model that, for the first time compares the incentive effects of four common subsidy modes on waste cooking oil supply for biofuel refining and sales of waste cooking oil refined products. The model considers the impact of preferential tax treatment, a raw material subsidy, a sales subsidy and an investment subsidy on the profits of biofuel enterprises and waste cooking oil recyclers. Results indicate that common approaches adopted in developed economies such as raw material price subsidies and finished products sales subsidies increase the profits of both biofuel enterprises and recyclers. On the contrary, investment subsidies, which are relatively common in some regions of China, increase the profits of recyclers, while reducing revenues achieved by biofuel enterprises. To promote the supply chain, policy should give priority to raw material price subsidies and finished products sales subsidies, and for investment subsidies, however, the government should be cautious.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Huiming & Li, Lianshui & Zhou, Peng & Hou, Jianmin & Qiu, Yueming, 2014. "Subsidy modes, waste cooking oil and biofuel: Policy effectiveness and sustainable supply chains in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 270-274.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:65:y:2014:i:c:p:270-274
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030142151301029X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fagiani, Riccardo & Barquín, Julián & Hakvoort, Rudi, 2013. "Risk-based assessment of the cost-efficiency and the effectivity of renewable energy support schemes: Certificate markets versus feed-in tariffs," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 648-661.
    2. Paul L. Joskow, 2001. "U.S. Energy Policy During the 1990s," NBER Working Papers 8454, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Geraldo Ferrer & Jayashankar M. Swaminathan, 2006. "Managing New and Remanufactured Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 15-26, January.
    4. Hsu, Chiung-Wen, 2012. "Using a system dynamics model to assess the effects of capital subsidies and feed-in tariffs on solar PV installations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 205-217.
    5. Dong, C.G., 2012. "Feed-in tariff vs. renewable portfolio standard: An empirical test of their relative effectiveness in promoting wind capacity development," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 476-485.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shi, Yi & Huang, Yidan & Xu, Jiuping, 2024. "A clean optimization approach for sustainable waste-to-energy using integrated technology," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    2. Shi, Yi & Deng, Yawen & Wang, Guoan & Xu, Jiuping, 2020. "Stackelberg equilibrium-based eco-economic approach for sustainable development of kitchen waste disposal with subsidy policy: A case study from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    3. Gurunathan Manikandan & P. Rajesh Kanna & Dawid Taler & Tomasz Sobota, 2023. "Review of Waste Cooking Oil (WCO) as a Feedstock for Biofuel—Indian Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-17, February.
    4. Zhang, Huiming & Aytun Ozturk, U. & Wang, Qunwei & Zhao, Zengyao, 2014. "Biodiesel produced by waste cooking oil: Review of recycling modes in China, the US and Japan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 677-685.
    5. Zhao, Yuanhao & Wang, Changbo & Zhang, Lixiao & Chang, Yuan & Hao, Yan, 2021. "Converting waste cooking oil to biodiesel in China: Environmental impacts and economic feasibility," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    6. Qiuyun Zhu & Xiaoyang Zhou & Aijun Liu & Chong Gao & Lei Xu & Fan Zhao & Ding Zhang & Benjamin Lev, 2022. "Equilibrium Optimization with Multi-Energy-Efficiency-Grade Products: Government and Market Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-23, October.
    7. Zhou, Yuanqi & Yang, Jinqiang & Jia, Zhijie, 2023. "Optimizing energy efficiency investments in steel firms: A real options model considering carbon trading and tax cuts during challenging economic conditions," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    8. George Halkos & Kleoniki Natalia Petrou, 2019. "Analysing the Energy Efficiency of EU Member States: The Potential of Energy Recovery from Waste in the Circular Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-32, September.
    9. Fan, Lurong & Ma, Ning & Zhang, Wen, 2023. "Multi-stakeholder equilibrium-based subsidy allocation mechanism for promoting coalbed methane scale extraction-utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    10. Zhang, Huiming & Xu, Zhidong & Zhou, Dequn & Cao, Jie, 2017. "Waste cooking oil-to-energy under incomplete information: Identifying policy options through an evolutionary game," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 547-555.
    11. Shi, Yi & Xu, Jiuping, 2023. "A multi-objective approach to kitchen waste and excess sludge co-digestion for biomethane production with anaerobic digestion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PA).
    12. Cho, Sangmin & Kim, Jihyo & Park, Hi-Chun & Heo, Eunnyeong, 2015. "Incentives for waste cooking oil collection in South Korea: A contingent valuation approach," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 63-71.
    13. Wang, Zhanwu & Wang, Zhenfeng & Tahir, Nadeem & Wang, Heng & Li, Jin & Xu, Guangyin, 2020. "Study of synergetic development in straw power supply chain: Straw price and government subsidy as incentive," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    14. Fan, Lurong & Wang, Binyu & Song, Xiaoling, 2023. "An authority-enterprise equilibrium differentiated subsidy mechanism for promoting coalbed methane extraction in multiple coal seams," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PA).
    15. Zhang, Huiming & Zheng, Yu & Cao, Jie & Qiu, Yueming, 2017. "Has government intervention effectively encouraged the use of waste cooking oil as an energy source? Comparison of two Chinese biofuel companies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 708-715.
    16. Yuyin Yi & Jinxi Li, 2018. "Cost-Sharing Contracts for Energy Saving and Emissions Reduction of a Supply Chain under the Conditions of Government Subsidies and a Carbon Tax," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-33, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abolhosseini, Shahrouz & Heshmati, Almas, 2014. "The main support mechanisms to finance renewable energy development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 876-885.
    2. Zhang, Libo & Chen, Changqi & Wang, Qunwei & Zhou, Dequn, 2021. "The impact of feed-in tariff reduction and renewable portfolio standard on the development of distributed photovoltaic generation in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    3. Hoz, Jordi de la & Martín, Helena & Montalà, Montserrat & Matas, José & Guzman, Ramon, 2018. "Assessing the 2014 retroactive regulatory framework applied to the concentrating solar power systems in Spain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 1377-1399.
    4. Nicolini, Marcella & Tavoni, Massimo, 2017. "Are renewable energy subsidies effective? Evidence from Europe," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 412-423.
    5. Pineda, Salvador & Boomsma, Trine K. & Wogrin, Sonja, 2018. "Renewable generation expansion under different support schemes: A stochastic equilibrium approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(3), pages 1086-1099.
    6. Rossi, Federico & Heleno, Miguel & Basosi, Riccardo & Sinicropi, Adalgisa, 2021. "LCA driven solar compensation mechanism for Renewable Energy Communities: the Italian case," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    7. Shen, Neng & Deng, Rumeng & Liao, Haolan & Shevchuk, Oleksandr, 2020. "Mapping renewable energy subsidy policy research published from 1997 to 2018: A scientometric review," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    8. Ahmad, Salman & Tahar, Razman Mat & Muhammad-Sukki, Firdaus & Munir, Abu Bakar & Rahim, Ruzairi Abdul, 2015. "Role of feed-in tariff policy in promoting solar photovoltaic investments in Malaysia: A system dynamics approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 808-815.
    9. Qingyuan Zhu & Chenghao Yu & Zhiyang SHEN & Malin Song, 2023. "Competition between a manufacturer and a relicensing third party when customers are strategic," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(4), pages 2021-2040, June.
    10. Ying Wu & Youwei Li, 2022. "Competition or Authorization—Manufacturers’ Choice of Remanufacturing Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-29, October.
    11. Yenipazarli, Arda, 2016. "Managing new and remanufactured products to mitigate environmental damage under emissions regulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(1), pages 117-130.
    12. Ramani, Vinay & De Giovanni, Pietro, 2017. "A two-period model of product cannibalization in an atypical Closed-loop Supply Chain with endogenous returns: The case of DellReconnect," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(3), pages 1009-1027.
    13. Briguglio, Marie & Formosa, Glenn, 2017. "When households go solar: Determinants of uptake of a Photovoltaic Scheme and policy insights," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 154-162.
    14. Lan, Haifeng & Gou, Zhonghua & Yang, Linchuan, 2020. "House price premium associated with residential solar photovoltaics and the effect from feed-in tariffs: A case study of Southport in Queensland, Australia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 907-916.
    15. Zhang, Tongzhu & Chu, Jiangwei & Wang, Xueping & Liu, Xianghai & Cui, Pengfei, 2011. "Development pattern and enhancing system of automotive components remanufacturing industry in China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(6), pages 613-622.
    16. Haitao Chen & Zhaohui Dong & Gendao Li, 2020. "Government Reward-Penalty Mechanism in Dual-Channel Closed-Loop Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-15, October.
    17. Jenner, Steffen & Groba, Felix & Indvik, Joe, 2013. "Assessing the strength and effectiveness of renewable electricity feed-in tariffs in European Union countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 385-401.
    18. de Oliveira, Lucas Guedes & Aquila, Giancarlo & Balestrassi, Pedro Paulo & de Paiva, Anderson Paulo & de Queiroz, Anderson Rodrigo & de Oliveira Pamplona, Edson & Camatta, Ulisses Pessin, 2020. "Evaluating economic feasibility and maximization of social welfare of photovoltaic projects developed for the Brazilian northeastern coast: An attribute agreement analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    19. Youhyun Lee & Inseok Seo, 2019. "Sustainability of a Policy Instrument: Rethinking the Renewable Portfolio Standard in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, May.
    20. Jian Li & Weihao Du & Fengmei Yang & Guowei Hua, 2014. "The Carbon Subsidy Analysis in Remanufacturing Closed-Loop Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(6), pages 1-17, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:65:y:2014:i:c:p:270-274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.