IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v38y2010i9p5072-5080.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of geologic storage options of CO2: Applicability, cost, storage capacity and safety

Author

Listed:
  • Aydin, Gokhan
  • Karakurt, Izzet
  • Aydiner, Kerim

Abstract

CO2 emissions in the atmosphere are increasing continually, which are mainly originated from burning of fossil fuels. The fossil fuels are expected to remain a major component of the world's energy supply in the near future, because of their inherent advantages. Therefore, various measures have to be considered to reduce anthropogenic CO2 emissions. Increasing the efficiency of energy usage and/or developing lower carbon or non-carbon energies to replace high carbon fuels may bring the result of the reduction of the accumulation of CO2 in the atmosphere. The other alternative to reduce CO2 concentrations in atmosphere include gaseous storage in various deep geological formations, liquid storage in the ocean, and solid storage by reaction of CO2 with metal oxides to produce stable carbonates. In this article, the geological storage options of CO2 are examined. They are discussed in terms of applicability, cost, storage capacity and safety.

Suggested Citation

  • Aydin, Gokhan & Karakurt, Izzet & Aydiner, Kerim, 2010. "Evaluation of geologic storage options of CO2: Applicability, cost, storage capacity and safety," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(9), pages 5072-5080, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:38:y:2010:i:9:p:5072-5080
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301-4215(10)00309-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gibbins, Jon & Chalmers, Hannah, 2008. "Carbon capture and storage," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 4317-4322, December.
    2. Davison, John, 2007. "Performance and costs of power plants with capture and storage of CO2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1163-1176.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aydin, Gokhan, 2014. "Modeling of energy consumption based on economic and demographic factors: The case of Turkey with projections," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 382-389.
    2. Ningning Zhao & Tianfu Xu & Kairan Wang & Hailong Tian & Fugang Wang, 2018. "Experimental study of physical‐chemical properties modification of coal after CO2 sequestration in deep unmineable coal seams," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 8(3), pages 510-528, June.
    3. Ghorbani, Afshin & Rahimpour, Hamid Reza & Ghasemi, Younes & Zoughi, Somayeh & Rahimpour, Mohammad Reza, 2014. "A Review of Carbon Capture and Sequestration in Iran: Microalgal Biofixation Potential in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 73-100.
    4. Višković, Alfredo & Franki, Vladimir & Valentić, Vladimir, 2014. "CCS (carbon capture and storage) investment possibility in South East Europe: A case study for Croatia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 325-337.
    5. Qian Wu & Qianguo Lin & Qiang Yang & Yang Li, 2022. "An optimization‐based CCUS source‐sink matching model for dynamic planning of CCUS clusters," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 12(4), pages 433-453, August.
    6. Nehil Shreyash & Muskan Sonker & Sushant Bajpai & Saurabh Kr Tiwary & Mohd Ashhar Khan & Subham Raj & Tushar Sharma & Susham Biswas, 2021. "The Review of Carbon Capture-Storage Technologies and Developing Fuel Cells for Enhancing Utilization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-34, August.
    7. Karakurt, Izzet & Aydin, Gokhan & Aydiner, Kerim, 2012. "Sources and mitigation of methane emissions by sectors: A critical review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 40-48.
    8. Locatelli, Giorgio & Mancini, Mauro, 2010. "Small-medium sized nuclear coal and gas power plant: A probabilistic analysis of their financial performances and influence of CO2 cost," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 6360-6374, October.
    9. Alfredo Viskovic & Vladimir Valentic & Vladimir Franki, 2013. "The impac t of carbon prices on CCS investment in South East Europe," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(3), pages 91-120.
    10. Wang, Xiaolei & Geng, Jiabo & Zhang, Dongming & Xiao, Weijing & Chen, Yu & Zhang, Hao, 2022. "Influence of sub-supercritical CO2 on pore structure and fractal characteristics of anthracite: An experimental study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    11. Eigbe, Patrick A. & Ajayi, Olatunbosun O. & Olakoyejo, Olabode T. & Fadipe, Opeyemi L. & Efe, Steven & Adelaja, Adekunle O., 2023. "A general review of CO2 sequestration in underground geological formations and assessment of depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs in the Niger Delta," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 350(C).
    12. Bettina Beeskow-Strauch & Judith Maria Schicks, 2012. "The Driving Forces of Guest Substitution in Gas Hydrates—A Laser Raman Study on CH 4 -CO 2 Exchange in the Presence of Impurities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-18, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yerbol Sarbassov & Lunbo Duan & Vasilije Manovic & Edward J. Anthony, 2018. "Sulfur trioxide formation/emissions in coal‐fired air‐ and oxy‐fuel combustion processes: a review," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 8(3), pages 402-428, June.
    2. Setiawan, Andri D. & Cuppen, Eefje, 2013. "Stakeholder perspectives on carbon capture and storage in Indonesia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 1188-1199.
    3. Mo, Jian-Lei & Schleich, Joachim & Zhu, Lei & Fan, Ying, 2015. "Delaying the introduction of emissions trading systems—Implications for power plant investment and operation from a multi-stage decision model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(PB), pages 255-264.
    4. Lai, N.Y.G. & Yap, E.H. & Lee, C.W., 2011. "Viability of CCS: A broad-based assessment for Malaysia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(8), pages 3608-3616.
    5. Liang, Ying & Cai, Lei & Guan, Yanwen & Liu, Wenbin & Xiang, Yanlei & Li, Juan & He, Tianzhi, 2020. "Numerical study on an original oxy-fuel combustion power plant with efficient utilization of flue gas waste heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    6. Barelli, L. & Ottaviano, A., 2014. "Solid oxide fuel cell technology coupled with methane dry reforming: A viable option for high efficiency plant with reduced CO2 emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 118-129.
    7. Chu, Fengming & Yang, Lijun & Du, Xiaoze & Yang, Yongping, 2017. "Mass transfer and energy consumption for CO2 absorption by ammonia solution in bubble column," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1068-1080.
    8. Gomes, Gabriel Lourenço & Szklo, Alexandre & Schaeffer, Roberto, 2009. "The impact of CO2 taxation on the configuration of new refineries: An application to Brazil," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(12), pages 5519-5529, December.
    9. Nemet, Gregory F. & Baker, Erin & Jenni, Karen E., 2013. "Modeling the future costs of carbon capture using experts' elicited probabilities under policy scenarios," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 218-228.
    10. Christian Leßmann & Arne Steinkraus, 2016. "Kurz zum Klima: »Carbon Capture and Storage« – was kostet die Emissionsvermeidung?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 69(05), pages 51-54, March.
    11. Georgios Varvoutis & Athanasios Lampropoulos & Evridiki Mandela & Michalis Konsolakis & George E. Marnellos, 2022. "Recent Advances on CO 2 Mitigation Technologies: On the Role of Hydrogenation Route via Green H 2," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-38, June.
    12. Stewart Russell & Nils Markusson & Vivian Scott, 2012. "What will CCS demonstrations demonstrate?," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 17(6), pages 651-668, August.
    13. Wu Haibo & Liu Zhaohui, 2018. "Economic research relating to a 200 MWe oxy‐fuel combustion power plant," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 8(5), pages 911-919, October.
    14. Chen, Wei-Hsin & Tsai, Ming-Hang & Hung, Chen-I, 2013. "Numerical prediction of CO2 capture process by a single droplet in alkaline spray," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 125-134.
    15. Tang, YuTing & Ma, XiaoQian & Lai, ZhiYi & Chen, Yong, 2013. "Energy analysis and environmental impacts of a MSW oxy-fuel incineration power plant in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 132-141.
    16. Gavenas, Ekaterina & Rosendahl, Knut Einar & Skjerpen, Terje, 2015. "CO2-emissions from Norwegian oil and gas extraction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1956-1966.
    17. Fan, Junming & Zhu, Lin & Hong, Hui & Jiang, Qiongqiong & Jin, Hongguang, 2017. "A thermodynamic and environmental performance of in-situ gasification of chemical looping combustion for power generation using ilmenite with different coals and comparison with other coal-driven powe," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 1171-1180.
    18. Lin, Chih-Wei & Nazeri, Mahmoud & Bhattacharji, Ayan & Spicer, George & Maroto-Valer, M. Mercedes, 2016. "Apparatus and method for calibrating a Coriolis mass flow meter for carbon dioxide at pressure and temperature conditions represented to CCS pipeline operations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 759-764.
    19. Rashwan, Sherif S. & Ibrahim, Abdelmaged H. & Abou-Arab, Tharwat W. & Nemitallah, Medhat A. & Habib, Mohamed A., 2017. "Experimental study of atmospheric partially premixed oxy-combustion flames anchored over a perforated plate burner," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 159-167.
    20. Cavalcanti, Eduardo J.C. & Lima, Matheus S.R. & de Souza, Gabriel F., 2020. "Comparison of carbon capture system and concentrated solar power in natural gas combined cycle: Exergetic and exergoenvironmental analyses," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 1336-1347.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    CO2 Capture Geologic storage;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:38:y:2010:i:9:p:5072-5080. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.