IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v177y2023ics0301421523001428.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Subsidy removal, regional trade and CO2 mitigation in the electricity sector in the Middle East and North Africa region

Author

Listed:
  • Timilsina, Govinda R.
  • Deluque Curiel, Ilka Fabiana

Abstract

This study analyzes the impacts on the power sector in the Middle East and North Africa region of three policies: removal of fuel subsidies, enhanced cross-border electricity trade, and a cap on carbon dioxide emissions. The analysis uses a power system planning model that minimizes the total electricity supply cost over 2018–2035 by satisfying specified technical, economic, environmental, and policy constraints. The study shows that the region would save between US$26.3 billion and US$27.5 billion, measured in 2018 prices, by removing subsidies to natural gas used for power generation. Cross-border electricity trade would save US$83.6 billion to US$90.9 billion. The two policies together would yield a reduction of 10 percent in cumulative power-sector CO2 emissions in the region, with a net cost savings of US$111 billion. If a carbon emission-constraining policy is considered to achieve the same level of emissions reduction, the power supply costs will increase by US$97 billion. The study also reveals that the removal of fossil fuel subsidies and expanded cross-border electricity trade significantly complement each other and also to achieve climate change mitigation targets in the MENA region.

Suggested Citation

  • Timilsina, Govinda R. & Deluque Curiel, Ilka Fabiana, 2023. "Subsidy removal, regional trade and CO2 mitigation in the electricity sector in the Middle East and North Africa region," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:177:y:2023:i:c:s0301421523001428
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113557
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421523001428
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113557?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nahmmacher, Paul & Schmid, Eva & Hirth, Lion & Knopf, Brigitte, 2016. "Carpe diem: A novel approach to select representative days for long-term power system modeling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 430-442.
    2. Jessica Jewell & David McCollum & Johannes Emmerling & Christoph Bertram & David E. H. J. Gernaat & Volker Krey & Leonidas Paroussos & Loïc Berger & Kostas Fragkiadakis & Ilkka Keppo & Nawfal Saadi & , 2018. "Limited emission reductions from fuel subsidy removal except in energy-exporting regions," Nature, Nature, vol. 554(7691), pages 229-233, February.
    3. Govinda R. Timilsina, 2021. "Regional electricity trade for hydropower development in South Asia," International Journal of Water Resources Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 392-410, May.
    4. Wogan, David & Murphy, Frederic & Pierru, Axel, 2019. "The costs and gains of policy options for coordinating electricity generation in the Gulf Cooperation Council," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 452-463.
    5. Mundaca, Gabriela, 2017. "How much can CO2 emissions be reduced if fossil fuel subsidies are removed?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 91-104.
    6. Monasterolo, Irene & Raberto, Marco, 2019. "The impact of phasing out fossil fuel subsidies on the low-carbon transition," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 355-370.
    7. Govinda R Timilsina and Mike Toman, 2018. "Carbon Pricing and Cross-Border Electricity Trading for Climate Change Mitigation in South Asia," Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 2).
    8. P. Deossa & K. De Vos & G. Deconinck & J. Espinosa, 2017. "Generation Expansion Models including Technical Constraints and Demand Uncertainty," Journal of Applied Mathematics, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-11, April.
    9. Roos, Elizabeth L. & Adams, Philip D., 2020. "The Economy-Wide Impact of Subsidy Reform: A CGE Analysis," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(S1), pages 18-38, July.
    10. Timilsina, Govinda R. & Toman, Mike, 2016. "Potential gains from expanding regional electricity trade in South Asia," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 6-14.
    11. Chepeliev, Maksym & van der Mensbrugghe, Dominique, 2020. "Global fossil-fuel subsidy reform and Paris Agreement," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Antimiani, Alessandro & Costantini, Valeria & Paglialunga, Elena, 2023. "Fossil fuels subsidy removal and the EU carbon neutrality policy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    2. Vahid Mohamad Taghvaee & Abbas Assari Arani & Susanne Soretz & Lotfali Agheli, 2023. "Diesel demand elasticities and sustainable development pillars of economy, environment and social (health): comparing two strategies of subsidy removal and energy efficiency," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 2285-2315, March.
    3. Xu, Shang & Zhang, Jun, 2023. "The welfare impacts of removing coal subsidies in rural China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    4. Timilsina,Govinda R. & Deluque Curiel,Ilka Fabiana & Chattopadhyay,Debabrata, 2021. "How Much Does Latin America Gain from Enhanced Cross-Border Electricity Trade in the Short Run ?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9692, The World Bank.
    5. Andrea Marcello Bassi & Georg Pallaske & Richard Bridle & Kavya Bajaj, 2023. "Emission Reduction via Fossil Fuel Subsidy Removal and Carbon Pricing, Creating Synergies with Revenue Recycling," World, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-16, April.
    6. Nepal, Rabindra & Paija, Nirash, 2019. "Energy security, electricity, population and economic growth: The case of a developing South Asian resource-rich economy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 771-781.
    7. Aryanpur, V. & Ghahremani, M. & Mamipour, S. & Fattahi, M. & Ó Gallachóir, B. & Bazilian, M.D. & Glynn, J., 2022. "Ex-post analysis of energy subsidy removal through integrated energy systems modelling," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    8. Timilsina,Govinda R. & Deluque Curiel,Ilka Fabiana, 2020. "Power System Implications of Subsidy Removal, Regional Electricity Trade, and Carbon Constraints in MENA Economies," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9297, The World Bank.
    9. de Guibert, Paul & Shirizadeh, Behrang & Quirion, Philippe, 2020. "Variable time-step: A method for improving computational tractability for energy system models with long-term storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    10. Osorio, Sebastian & Pietzcker, Robert C. & Pahle, Michael & Edenhofer, Ottmar, 2020. "How to deal with the risks of phasing out coal in Germany," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    11. Kenjiro Yagi & Ramteen Sioshansi, 2023. "Simplifying capacity planning for electricity systems with hydroelectric and renewable generation," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-28, December.
    12. Skare, Marinko & Gavurova, Beata & Sinkovic, Dean, 2023. "Regional aspects of financial development and renewable energy: A cross-sectional study in 214 countries," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1142-1157.
    13. Koltsaklis, Nikolaos E. & Nazos, Konstantinos, 2017. "A stochastic MILP energy planning model incorporating power market dynamics," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1364-1383.
    14. Virasjoki, Vilma & Siddiqui, Afzal S. & Oliveira, Fabricio & Salo, Ahti, 2020. "Utility-scale energy storage in an imperfectly competitive power sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    15. Bahl, Björn & Kümpel, Alexander & Seele, Hagen & Lampe, Matthias & Bardow, André, 2017. "Time-series aggregation for synthesis problems by bounding error in the objective function," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 900-912.
    16. Haqiqi, Iman & Yasharel, Sepideh, 2018. "Removing Fossil Fuel Subsidies to Help the Poor," MPRA Paper 95907, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Lisa Göransson & Caroline Granfeldt & Ann-Brith Strömberg, 2021. "Management of Wind Power Variations in Electricity System Investment Models," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 1-30, June.
    18. Dafermos, Yannis & Nikolaidi, Maria, 2022. "Assessing climate policies: an ecological stock–flow consistent perspective," Greenwich Papers in Political Economy 38039, University of Greenwich, Greenwich Political Economy Research Centre.
    19. Fan, Lurong & Xu, Jiuping, 2020. "Authority–enterprise equilibrium based mixed subsidy mechanism for carbon reduction and energy utilization in the coalbed methane industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    20. Germeshausen, Robert & Wölfing, Nikolas, 2019. "How marginal is lignite? Two simple approaches to determine price-setting technologies in power markets," ZEW Discussion Papers 19-031, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:177:y:2023:i:c:s0301421523001428. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.