IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v273y2014icp200-209.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Seeking the flowers for the bees: Integrating biotic interactions into niche models to assess the distribution of the exotic bee species Lithurgus huberi in South America

Author

Listed:
  • Silva, Daniel P.
  • Gonzalez, Victor H.
  • Melo, Gabriel A.R.
  • Lucia, Mariano
  • Alvarez, Leopoldo J.
  • De Marco, Paulo

Abstract

The wood-boring bee Lithurgus huberi Ducke (Apidae: Megachilinae: Lithurgini) is arguably an exotic species to South America. This solitary bee is the only representative in the Western Hemisphere of the Old World genus Lithurgus, and likely a conspecific with the Indo-Australian species Lithurgus atratus. L. huberi appears to have reached the continent at least 100 years ago, when it was discovered and described. Because this species seems to be oligolectic on pollen of Convolvulaceae flowers in South America, we attempted to integrate this biotic interaction (plant–bee relationships) to our species distribution model (SDM) procedures to predict its potential distribution in South America. The modeled distribution of seven L. huberi's host plant species did not improve the algorithms’ ability to predict its distribution, but it produced constrained ranges. These results suggest that our biotic variables are not independent of the abiotic variables used (mostly related to climate). We employed five modeling algorithms, Envelope Score, GARP, Mahalanobis Distance, Support Vector Machines, and MaxEnt, but only the former two showed a good performance when predicting the occurrence of both, the host plant species and L. huberi. Our results indicate that this exotic pollinator is mainly distributed in eastern, northeastern, central, and southwestern South America, with few suitable areas in the Amazon region. We also highlight suitable areas for future surveys and present new occurrence records.

Suggested Citation

  • Silva, Daniel P. & Gonzalez, Victor H. & Melo, Gabriel A.R. & Lucia, Mariano & Alvarez, Leopoldo J. & De Marco, Paulo, 2014. "Seeking the flowers for the bees: Integrating biotic interactions into niche models to assess the distribution of the exotic bee species Lithurgus huberi in South America," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 273(C), pages 200-209.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:273:y:2014:i:c:p:200-209
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.11.016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380013005644
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.11.016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giannini, T.C. & Pinto, C.E. & Acosta, A.L. & Taniguchi, M. & Saraiva, A.M. & Alves-dos-Santos, I., 2013. "Interactions at large spatial scale: The case of Centris bees and floral oil producing plants in South America," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 258(C), pages 74-81.
    2. Christopher J. Raxworthy & Enrique Martinez-Meyer & Ned Horning & Ronald A. Nussbaum & Gregory E. Schneider & Miguel A. Ortega-Huerta & A. Townsend Peterson, 2003. "Predicting distributions of known and unknown reptile species in Madagascar," Nature, Nature, vol. 426(6968), pages 837-841, December.
    3. Pimentel, David & Zuniga, Rodolfo & Morrison, Doug, 2005. "Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 273-288, February.
    4. Giannini, T.C. & Lira-Saade, R. & Ayala, R. & Saraiva, A.M. & Alves-dos-Santos, I., 2011. "Ecological niche similarities of Peponapis bees and non-domesticated Cucurbita species," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(12), pages 2011-2018.
    5. González-Salazar, Constantino & Stephens, Christopher R. & Marquet, Pablo A., 2013. "Comparing the relative contributions of biotic and abiotic factors as mediators of species’ distributions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 248(C), pages 57-70.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. John M. Humphreys & Robert B. Srygley & David H. Branson, 2022. "Geographic Variation in Migratory Grasshopper Recruitment under Projected Climate Change," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-19, January.
    2. repec:plo:pone00:0207914 is not listed on IDEAS

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ceddia, M.G. & Bardsley, N.O. & Goodwin, R. & Holloway, G.J. & Nocella, G. & Stasi, A., 2013. "A complex system perspective on the emergence and spread of infectious diseases: Integrating economic and ecological aspects," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 124-131.
    2. Travis Warziniack & David Finnoff & Jonathan Bossenbroek & Jason Shogren & David Lodge, 2011. "Stepping Stones for Biological Invasion: A Bioeconomic Model of Transferable Risk," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 50(4), pages 605-627, December.
    3. Peterson, A. Townsend & Papeş, Monica & Soberón, Jorge, 2008. "Rethinking receiver operating characteristic analysis applications in ecological niche modeling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 63-72.
    4. Blackwood, Julie & Hastings, Alan & Costello, Christopher, 2010. "Cost-effective management of invasive species using linear-quadratic control," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 519-527, January.
    5. Cook, David & Proctor, Wendy, 2007. "Assessing the threat of exotic plant pests," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(2-3), pages 594-604, August.
    6. Mirko Di Febbraro & Peter W W Lurz & Piero Genovesi & Luigi Maiorano & Marco Girardello & Sandro Bertolino, 2013. "The Use of Climatic Niches in Screening Procedures for Introduced Species to Evaluate Risk of Spread: A Case with the American Eastern Grey Squirrel," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-10, July.
    7. Colvin, Michael E. & Pierce, Clay L. & Stewart, Timothy W., 2015. "A food web modeling analysis of a Midwestern, USA eutrophic lake dominated by non-native Common Carp and Zebra Mussels," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 312(C), pages 26-40.
    8. Beça, Pedro & Santos, Rui, 2010. "Measuring sustainable welfare: A new approach to the ISEW," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(4), pages 810-819, February.
    9. Don Driscoll & Adam Felton & Philip Gibbons & Annika Felton & Nicola Munro & David Lindenmayer, 2012. "Priorities in policy and management when existing biodiversity stressors interact with climate-change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 111(3), pages 533-557, April.
    10. Liu, Yanxu & Sims, Charles, 2016. "Spatial-dynamic externalities and coordination in invasive species control," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 23-38.
    11. Jones, Kristin Roti & Corona, Joel P., 2008. "An ambient tax approach to invasive species," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(3), pages 534-541, January.
    12. Sinden, John Alfred & Griffith, Garry, 2007. "Combining economic and ecological arguments to value the environmental gains from control of 35 weeds in Australia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2-3), pages 396-408, March.
    13. Gabriele Soriano & Mónica Fernández-Aparicio & Marco Masi & Susana Vilariño-Rodríguez & Alessio Cimmino, 2022. "Complex Mixture of Arvensic Acids Isolated from Convolvulus arvensis Roots Identified as Inhibitors of Radicle Growth of Broomrape Weeds," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-10, April.
    14. Zapata, Samuel D. & Dudensing, Rebekka & Sekula, Danielle & Esparza-Díaz, Gabriela & Villanueva, Raul, 2018. "Economic Impact Of The Sugarcane Aphid Outbreak In South Texas," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 50(1), pages 104-128, February.
    15. Hlasny, Vladimir & Livingston, Michael J., 2008. "Economic Determinants of Invasion and Discovery of Nonindigenous Insects," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 40(01), pages 1-16, April.
    16. Giaccaria Sergio & Dalmazzone Silvana, 2010. "Socio-economic drivers of biological invasions. A worldwide, bio-geographical analysis of trade flows and local environmental quality," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 201003, University of Turin.
    17. repec:plo:pone00:0120373 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Parshad, Rana D. & Wickramsooriya, Sureni & Bailey, Susan, 2020. "A remark on “Biological control through provision of additional food to predators: A theoretical study†[Theor. Popul. Biol. 72 (2007) 111–120]," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 60-68.
    19. Antonio Moreno-Robles & Antonio Cala Peralta & Gabriele Soriano & Jesús G. Zorrilla & Marco Masi & Susana Vilariño-Rodríguez & Alessio Cimmino & Mónica Fernández-Aparicio, 2022. "Identification of Allelochemicals with Differential Modes of Phytotoxicity against Cuscuta campestris," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-15, October.
    20. Nunes, Pedro & Branco, Manuela & Franco, José Carlos & Santos, Mário, 2025. "Patterns, processes and scales shaping invasive pest species dynamics within agricultural landscapes: Modelling the spread of the African citrus psyllid in European lemon orchards," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    21. Horsch, Eric J. & Lewis, David J., 2008. "The Effects of Aquatic Invasive Species on Property Values: Evidence from a Quasi-Random Experiment," Staff Papers 92216, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:273:y:2014:i:c:p:200-209. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.