IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolec/v236y2025ics092180092500151x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The hidden dimension of low-carbon public transport policies: From biodiversity conservation to user preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Rigal, Stanislas
  • Calvet, Coralie
  • Tardieu, Léa
  • Roussel, Sébastien
  • Vaissière, Anne-Charlotte

Abstract

Transport infrastructures dedicated to low-carbon public transport are seen as a central tool in public policy strategies to mitigate climate change. Yet, the development of transport infrastructures has significant direct and indirect negative effects on biodiversity and social acceptability of these impacts remain little assessed. In this study, we analyse potential impacts of 20 tramway existing projects in France and social preferences with regard to their ecological and landscape integration. Using a discrete choice experiment on 1000 respondents, we show that users, even the most time constrained, are accepting an average travel time lengthening of 15 %, if tramway project integration retains a more wooded landscape, more diverse and abundant species and access to a natural area. We show that brief information provided on the state of biodiversity through framing encourages environmental consideration. We quantify the estimated impact of these projects on the naturalness of habitats and the buffer effect that project ecological integration could allow. These results highlight the non-negligible ecological impact of low-carbon transport infrastructures. They underline the need to consider climate change mitigation strategies in tandem with biodiversity preservation, while taking into account user preferences which affect the acceptability of the ecological and landscape integration of these projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Rigal, Stanislas & Calvet, Coralie & Tardieu, Léa & Roussel, Sébastien & Vaissière, Anne-Charlotte, 2025. "The hidden dimension of low-carbon public transport policies: From biodiversity conservation to user preferences," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:236:y:2025:i:c:s092180092500151x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108668
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092180092500151X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108668?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:236:y:2025:i:c:s092180092500151x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.