IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolec/v218y2024ics0921800924000132.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Private benefits of natural capital on farms across an endangered ecoregion

Author

Listed:
  • Clayton, Helena
  • Hingee, Kassel L.
  • Chancellor, Will
  • Lindenmayer, David
  • van Dijk, Albert
  • Vardon, Michael
  • Boult, Chris

Abstract

The conservation of natural capital on farms is being increasingly recognised as essential for addressing global biodiversity decline. At the same time, there is growing interest in the potential for natural capital on farms that generates high public benefits, to also generate private benefits, potentially fostering greater adoption of conservation practices on farms. Despite this, empirical analysis of private benefits of natural capital on farms remains limited. Addressing this gap can help in identifying conservation opportunities and selecting cost-effective policy mechanisms to deliver public good biodiversity conservation outcomes on private farmland. We present results from a hedonic model on private benefits associated with native woodland and bird biodiversity on commercial farmland in a critically endangered temperate woodland ecosystem in southeast Australia. Using quantile regression, we found significant heterogeneity in private benefits associated with such natural capital across farmland value quantiles. These private benefits increased from lower to upper land value quantiles, conditional on a range of attributes of the farmland parcel. In some instances, private costs were associated with enhancement of native woodland and bird biodiversity on farms, above even a very low baseline. We discuss the implications of these findings for targeting of investment and selection of policy mechanisms.

Suggested Citation

  • Clayton, Helena & Hingee, Kassel L. & Chancellor, Will & Lindenmayer, David & van Dijk, Albert & Vardon, Michael & Boult, Chris, 2024. "Private benefits of natural capital on farms across an endangered ecoregion," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:218:y:2024:i:c:s0921800924000132
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924000132
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108116?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:218:y:2024:i:c:s0921800924000132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.