IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecoser/v60y2023ics2212041623000116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cultural functional groups associated with birds relate closely to avian ecological functions and services

Author

Listed:
  • Zoeller, Kim C.
  • Cumming, Graeme S.

Abstract

The global rapid decline of ecological systems has highlighted the potential of ecosystem functions to drive conservation discourse. Ecosystem functions underpin important ecosystem services, and have been described for birds in South Africa based on measurable ecological traits (physiological, structural, behavioural, or phenological characteristics), as well as cultural functions (human preferences for morphological and behavioural traits). Understanding the spatial relationships between ecological and cultural functions can provide insight into the extent to which cultural services of birds are correlated with different ecological functions, and identify potential synergies in the distribution of cultural and ecological services. Here we show that when correcting for the effect of species richness and spatial autocorrelation on functional group richness, there is a clear correlation between avian cultural and ecological functional groups in South Africa (r = 0.6, t = 32.20, df = 1936, p < 0.05), suggesting that cultural functions are strongly correlated with ecologically relevant traits, despite their production being primarily mediated through human perception. This relationship was highly correlated in National Parks (r = 0.75, t = 14.95, df = 182, p < 0.05). For conservation initiatives that aim to maximise both ecosystem function and ecosystem service production, it is critical to identify and support synergies in the distribution of different functional groups to promote the production of multiple ecosystem services.

Suggested Citation

  • Zoeller, Kim C. & Cumming, Graeme S., 2023. "Cultural functional groups associated with birds relate closely to avian ecological functions and services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:60:y:2023:i:c:s2212041623000116
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2023.101519
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041623000116
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecoser.2023.101519?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. de Groot, Rudolf S. & Wilson, Matthew A. & Boumans, Roelof M. J., 2002. "A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 393-408, June.
    2. Maike Hamann & Reinette Biggs & Belinda Reyers, 2016. "An Exploration of Human Well-Being Bundles as Identifiers of Ecosystem Service Use Patterns," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-20, October.
    3. Cheng, Xin & Van Damme, Sylvie & Li, Luyuan & Uyttenhove, Pieter, 2019. "Evaluation of cultural ecosystem services: A review of methods," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 1-1.
    4. Andreas Schuldt & Thorsten Assmann & Matteo Brezzi & François Buscot & David Eichenberg & Jessica Gutknecht & Werner Härdtle & Jin-Sheng He & Alexandra-Maria Klein & Peter Kühn & Xiaojuan Liu & Keping, 2018. "Biodiversity across trophic levels drives multifunctionality in highly diverse forests," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, December.
    5. Clements, Hayley S. & Cumming, Graeme S., 2017. "Manager strategies and user demands: Determinants of cultural ecosystem service bundles on private protected areas," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(PB), pages 228-237.
    6. Zoeller, Kim C. & Gurney, Georgina G. & Heydinger, John & Cumming, Graeme S., 2020. "Defining cultural functional groups based on perceived traits assigned to birds," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    7. Potschin-Young, M. & Haines-Young, R. & Görg, C. & Heink, U. & Jax, K. & Schleyer, C., 2018. "Understanding the role of conceptual frameworks: Reading the ecosystem service cascade," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(PC), pages 428-440.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Valencia Torres, Angélica & Tiwari, Chetan & Atkinson, Samuel F., 2021. "Progress in ecosystem services research: A guide for scholars and practitioners," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    2. Zhao, Mingyue & Peng, Jian & Liu, Yuanxin & Li, Tianyi & Wang, Yanglin, 2018. "Mapping Watershed-Level Ecosystem Service Bundles in the Pearl River Delta, China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 106-117.
    3. Kubiszewski, Ida & Concollato, Luke & Costanza, Robert & Stern, David I., 2023. "Changes in authorship, networks, and research topics in ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    4. Simon Lhoest & Cédric Vermeulen & Adeline Fayolle & Pierre Jamar & Samuel Hette & Arielle Nkodo & Kevin Maréchal & Marc Dufrêne & Patrick Meyfroidt, 2020. "Quantifying the Use of Forest Ecosystem Services by Local Populations in Southeastern Cameroon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-22, March.
    5. Odirilwe Selomane & Belinda Reyers & Reinette Biggs & Maike Hamann, 2019. "Harnessing Insights from Social-Ecological Systems Research for Monitoring Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-36, February.
    6. Shackleton, Ross T., 2020. "Loss of land and livelihoods from mining operations: A case in the Limpopo Province, South Africa," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    7. Zhou, Peng & Zhang, Haijie & Huang, Bei & Ji, Yongli & Peng, Shaolin & Zhou, Ting, 2022. "Are productivity and biodiversity adequate predictors for rapid assessment of forest ecosystem services values?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    8. Cordero-Penín, Víctor & Abramic, Andrej & García-Mendoza, Alejandro & Otero-Ferrer, Francisco & Haroun, Ricardo, 2023. "Mapping marine ecosystem services potential across an oceanic archipelago: Applicability and limitations for decision-making," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    9. Peng, Jian & Wang, Xiaoyu & Liu, Yanxu & Zhao, Yan & Xu, Zihan & Zhao, Mingyue & Qiu, Sijing & Wu, Jiansheng, 2020. "Urbanization impact on the supply-demand budget of ecosystem services: Decoupling analysis," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    10. van den Heuvel, Lotte & Blicharska, Malgorzata & Masia, Sara & Sušnik, Janez & Teutschbein, Claudia, 2020. "Ecosystem services in the Swedish water-energy-food-land-climate nexus: Anthropogenic pressures and physical interactions," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    11. Teodoro Semeraro & Elisa Gatto & Riccardo Buccolieri & Valentina Catanzaro & Luigi De Bellis & Lorenzo Cotrozzi & Giacomo Lorenzini & Marzia Vergine & Andrea Luvisi, 2021. "How Ecosystem Services Can Strengthen the Regeneration Policies for Monumental Olive Groves Destroyed by Xylella fastidiosa Bacterium in a Peri-Urban Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-22, August.
    12. Cornelis Leeuwen & Jos Frijns & Annemarie Wezel & Frans Ven, 2012. "City Blueprints: 24 Indicators to Assess the Sustainability of the Urban Water Cycle," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(8), pages 2177-2197, June.
    13. Stefan Liehr & Julia Röhrig & Marion Mehring & Thomas Kluge, 2017. "How the Social-Ecological Systems Concept Can Guide Transdisciplinary Research and Implementation: Addressing Water Challenges in Central Northern Namibia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-19, June.
    14. Yanzi Wang & Chunming Wu & Yongfeng Gong & Zhen Zhu, 2021. "Can Adaptive Governance Promote Coupling Social-Ecological Systems? Evidence from the Vulnerable Ecological Region of Northwestern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-19, October.
    15. Breffle, William S. & Muralidharan, Daya & Donovan, Richard P. & Liu, Fangming & Mukherjee, Amlan & Jin, Yongliang, 2013. "Socioeconomic evaluation of the impact of natural resource stressors on human-use services in the Great Lakes environment: A Lake Michigan case study," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 152-161.
    16. Comino, E. & Ferretti, V., 2016. "Indicators-based spatial SWOT analysis: supporting the strategic planning and management of complex territorial systems," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 64142, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    17. P. Hlaváčková & D. Šafařík, 2016. "Quantification of the utility value of the recreational function of forests from the aspect of valuation practice," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(8), pages 345-356.
    18. Jansson, Åsa, 2013. "Reaching for a sustainable, resilient urban future using the lens of ecosystem services," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 285-291.
    19. Bolaños-Valencia, Ingrid & Villegas-Palacio, Clara & López-Gómez, Connie Paola & Berrouet, Lina & Ruiz, Aura, 2019. "Social perception of risk in socio-ecological systems. A qualitative and quantitative analysis," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 1-1.
    20. Bordt, Michael, 2018. "Discourses in Ecosystem Accounting: A Survey of the Expert Community," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 82-99.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:60:y:2023:i:c:s2212041623000116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecosystem-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.