IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecanpo/v81y2024icp249-268.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A theoretical framework for modeling dual-track granting orientation in green credit policy

Author

Listed:
  • Wu, Sheng
  • Zhou, Xiaoyong

Abstract

This study delves into the realm of green credit policy, a recognized solution for harmonizing financial growth with environmental progress. It highlights the pivotal role of credit-granting orientation in determining the effectiveness of green credit. Introducing a dual-track mechanism that combines industry and enterprise activity orientation, the study provides novel insights into green credit granting. Based on theoretical modeling and simulation analysis, the study explores how different granting orientations in green credit impact enterprise economic and environmental performance using stochastic dynamic programming. The results underscore that industry-oriented granting constrains eco-innovation capital investment and credit fund inflow, while activity-oriented granting leads to reduced carbon emissions and enhanced enterprise value. A dual-track green credit approach demonstrates a superior balance between the two orientations, delivering higher carbon emission reduction effects than industry-oriented granting and more sustainable impacts on enterprise value than activity-oriented granting. Ultimately, the study advocates for differentiating green credit into two orientation types and leveraging eco-innovation activities as credit allocation criteria to enhance the efficiency of green credit operations.

Suggested Citation

  • Wu, Sheng & Zhou, Xiaoyong, 2024. "A theoretical framework for modeling dual-track granting orientation in green credit policy," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 249-268.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:81:y:2024:i:c:p:249-268
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2023.11.035
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592623003144
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eap.2023.11.035?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:81:y:2024:i:c:p:249-268. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.