IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v104y2019ic27.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sharenting, is it a good or a bad thing? Understanding how adolescents think and feel about sharenting on social network sites

Author

Listed:
  • Verswijvel, Karen
  • Walrave, Michel
  • Hardies, Kris
  • Heirman, Wannes

Abstract

It is common nowadays for parents to share information about their children on social network sites (SNSs). However, little is known on how adolescents think and feel about this sharenting behavior. Therefore, this study explores adolescents' perception of the reasons why parents share information about their adolescent children on SNSs, and adolescents' attitudes toward sharenting. A survey study was conducted among 817 adolescents. Factor analyses pointed toward four perceived sharenting motives: parental advice motives, social motives, impression management motives, and informative-archiving motives. Adolescents believed that parents mainly shared information about their children due to informative-archiving motives. They believed that parental advice motives were less common. Preliminary analyses pointed out that adolescents largely disapproved of sharenting. They mainly considered it as embarrassing and useless. Regression analysis indicated that when adolescents perceived sharenting as an impression management issue, the more negative their attitudes were toward sharenting. Conversely, the more adolescents thought that parents shared information about their children due to informative-archiving motives, the less they disapproved of sharenting. Additionally, when adolescents themselves disclosed more personal information or when they were more often confronted with sharenting, they had more positive attitudes toward sharenting. Adolescents who were more concerned about their online privacy, were more likely to disapprove of sharenting.

Suggested Citation

  • Verswijvel, Karen & Walrave, Michel & Hardies, Kris & Heirman, Wannes, 2019. "Sharenting, is it a good or a bad thing? Understanding how adolescents think and feel about sharenting on social network sites," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 1-1.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:104:y:2019:i:c:27
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104401
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740919303482
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104401?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    2. Ouvrein, Gaëlle & Verswijvel, Karen, 2019. "Sharenting: Parental adoration or public humiliation? A focus group study on adolescents' experiences with sharenting against the background of their own impression management," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 319-327.
    3. Gary C. Moore & Izak Benbasat, 1991. "Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 2(3), pages 192-222, September.
    4. Wagner, Amina & Gasche, Lisa Alina, 2018. "Sharenting: Making Decisions about Other's Privacy on Social Networking Sites," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 90477, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    5. John Hulland, 1999. "Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(2), pages 195-204, February.
    6. Naresh K. Malhotra & Sung S. Kim & James Agarwal, 2004. "Internet Users' Information Privacy Concerns (IUIPC): The Construct, the Scale, and a Causal Model," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 336-355, December.
    7. Kietzmann, Jan H. & Hermkens, Kristopher & McCarthy, Ian P. & Silvestre, Bruno S., 2011. "Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 241-251, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aydoğdu, Fuat & Güngör, Beyza Şanal & Öz, Türkan Ayhan, 2023. "Does sharing bring happiness? Understanding the sharenting phenomenon," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    2. Romero-Rodríguez, José-M. & Kopecký, Kamil & García-González, Abel & Gómez-García, Gerardo, 2022. "Sharing images or videos of minors online: Validation of the Sharenting Evaluation Scale (SES)," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    3. L. Lin Ong & Alexa K. Fox & Laurel Aynne Cook & Claire Bessant & Pingping Gan & Mariea Grubbs Hoy & Emma Nottingham & Beatriz Pereira & Stacey Barell Steinberg, 2022. "Sharenting in an evolving digital world: Increasing online connection and consumer vulnerability," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(3), pages 1106-1126, September.
    4. Kopecky, Kamil & Szotkowski, Rene & Aznar-Díaz, Inmaculada & Romero-Rodríguez, José-María, 2020. "The phenomenon of sharenting and its risks in the online environment. Experiences from Czech Republic and Spain," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    5. Felipe Garrido & Alexandra Alvarez & Juan Luis González-Caballero & Pilar Garcia & Beatriz Couso & Isabel Iriso & Maria Merino & Genny Raffaeli & Patricia Sanmiguel & Cristina Arribas & Alex Vacaroaia, 2023. "Description of the Exposure of the Most-Followed Spanish Instamoms’ Children to Social Media," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-10, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Petschnig, Martin & Heidenreich, Sven & Spieth, Patrick, 2014. "Innovative alternatives take action – Investigating determinants of alternative fuel vehicle adoption," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 68-83.
    2. Attié, Elodie & Meyer-Waarden, Lars, 2022. "The acceptance and usage of smart connected objects according to adoption stages: an enhanced technology acceptance model integrating the diffusion of innovation, uses and gratification and privacy ca," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    3. Gao, Tao (Tony) & Rohm, Andrew J. & Sultan, Fareena & Pagani, Margherita, 2013. "Consumers un-tethered: A three-market empirical study of consumers' mobile marketing acceptance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2536-2544.
    4. Swapan Kumar Saha & Guijun Zhuang & Sihan Li, 2020. "Will Consumers Pay More for Efficient Delivery? An Empirical Study of What Affects E-Customers’ Satisfaction and Willingness to Pay on Online Shopping in Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22, February.
    5. Arumugam Seetharaman & Saurabh Singhal & Pankaj Galdhar & John Rudolph Raj & A. S. Saravanan, 2016. "Customers’ Expectations for Next Generation Internet Banking," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(01), pages 1-28, March.
    6. Christopher R. Plouffe & John S. Hulland & Mark Vandenbosch, 2001. "Research Report: Richness Versus Parsimony in Modeling Technology Adoption Decisions—Understanding Merchant Adoption of a Smart Card-Based Payment System," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 208-222, June.
    7. Sven Laumer & Andreas Eckhardt & Natascha Trunk, 2010. "Do as your parents say?—Analyzing IT adoption influencing factors for full and under age applicants," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 169-183, April.
    8. Daniel Fett & Joris Dehler-Holland & Markus Schmutz, 2021. "A survey on the user acceptance of PV battery storage systems," NachhaltigkeitsManagementForum | Sustainability Management Forum, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 161-171, June.
    9. Shirazi, Farid & Wu, Yun & Hajli, Ali & Zadeh, Arash H. & Hajli, Nick & Lin, Xiaolin, 2021. "Value co-creation in online healthcare communities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    10. Tazizur Rahman & Yang Sok Kim & Mijin Noh & Choong Kwon Lee, 2020. "Determinants of social commerce adoption in an emerging economy," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 14(4), pages 479-502, December.
    11. Trojanowski Mariusz & Kułak Jacek, 2017. "The Impact of Moderators and Trust on Consumer’s Intention to Use a Mobile Phone for Purchases," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 25(2), pages 91-116, June.
    12. Jaeki Song & Fatemeh Mariam Zahedi, 2005. "A Theoretical Approach to Web Design in E-Commerce: A Belief Reinforcement Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(8), pages 1219-1235, August.
    13. Im, Hyunjoo & Ha, Young, 2013. "Enablers and inhibitors of permission-based marketing: A case of mobile coupons," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 20(5), pages 495-503.
    14. Morosan, Cristian, 2016. "An empirical examination of U.S. travelers’ intentions to use biometric e-gates in airports," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 120-128.
    15. Paul Juinn Bing Tan, 2013. "Applying the UTAUT to Understand Factors Affecting the Use of English E-Learning Websites in Taiwan," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(4), pages 21582440135, October.
    16. Hajiheydari, Nastaran & Delgosha, Mohammad Soltani & Olya, Hossein, 2021. "Scepticism and resistance to IoMT in healthcare: Application of behavioural reasoning theory with configurational perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    17. Wang, Guoqiang & Tan, Garry Wei-Han & Yuan, Yunpeng & Ooi, Keng-Boon & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2022. "Revisiting TAM2 in behavioral targeting advertising: A deep learning-based dual-stage SEM-ANN analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    18. Riffat Ara Zannat Tama & Md Mahmudul Hoque & Ying Liu & Mohammad Jahangir Alam & Mark Yu, 2023. "An Application of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to Examining Farmers’ Behavioral Attitude and Intention towards Conservation Agriculture in Bangladesh," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, February.
    19. Zhenhui (Jack) Jiang & Cheng Suang Heng & Ben C. F. Choi, 2013. "Research Note —Privacy Concerns and Privacy-Protective Behavior in Synchronous Online Social Interactions," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 579-595, September.
    20. Zaitul Zaitul & Novianti Neva & Ilona Desi, 2022. "Village-Based Tourism Performance: Tourist Satisfaction and Revisit Intention," Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism, Sciendo, vol. 29(2), pages 36-43, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:104:y:2019:i:c:27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.