IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v48y2005i4p685-701.html

Quasi-Monte Carlo sampling to improve the efficiency of Monte Carlo EM

Author

Listed:
  • Jank, Wolfgang

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Jank, Wolfgang, 2005. "Quasi-Monte Carlo sampling to improve the efficiency of Monte Carlo EM," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 685-701, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:48:y:2005:i:4:p:685-701
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(04)00103-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bhat, Chandra R., 2001. "Quasi-random maximum simulated likelihood estimation of the mixed multinomial logit model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 677-693, August.
    2. Robert P. Sherman & Yu-Yun K. Ho & Siddhartha R. Dalal, 1999. "Conditions for convergence of Monte Carlo EM sequences with an application to product diffusion modeling," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 2(2), pages 248-267.
    3. Pierre L'Ecuyer, 1990. "A Unified View of the IPA, SF, and LR Gradient Estimation Techniques," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(11), pages 1364-1383, November.
    4. J. G. Booth & J. P. Hobert, 1999. "Maximizing generalized linear mixed model likelihoods with an automated Monte Carlo EM algorithm," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 61(1), pages 265-285.
    5. Pierre L’Ecuyer & Christiane Lemieux, 2002. "Recent Advances in Randomized Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Moshe Dror & Pierre L’Ecuyer & Ferenc Szidarovszky (ed.), Modeling Uncertainty, chapter 0, pages 419-474, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Allassonnière, Stéphanie & Chevallier, Juliette, 2021. "A new class of stochastic EM algorithms. Escaping local maxima and handling intractable sampling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    2. F. Y. Kuo & W. T. M. Dunsmuir & I. H. Sloan & M. P. Wand & R. S. Womersley, 2008. "Quasi-Monte Carlo for Highly Structured Generalised Response Models," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 239-275, June.
    3. Gonzalez, Jorge & Tuerlinckx, Francis & De Boeck, Paul & Cools, Ronald, 2006. "Numerical integration in logistic-normal models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 1535-1548, December.
    4. Trevezas, S. & Malefaki, S. & Cournède, P.-H., 2014. "Parameter estimation via stochastic variants of the ECM algorithm with applications to plant growth modeling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 82-99.
    5. Theodoros Chatzivasileiadis, 2017. "Quasi-random Monte Carlo application in CGE systematic sensitivity analysis," Papers 1709.09755, arXiv.org.
    6. Chen, Yunxia & Zhang, Wenbo & Xu, Dan, 2019. "Reliability assessment with varying safety threshold for shock resistant systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 49-60.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bastin, Fabian & Cirillo, Cinzia & Toint, Philippe L., 2006. "Application of an adaptive Monte Carlo algorithm to mixed logit estimation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 40(7), pages 577-593, August.
    2. Allassonnière, Stéphanie & Chevallier, Juliette, 2021. "A new class of stochastic EM algorithms. Escaping local maxima and handling intractable sampling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    3. Shu Yang & Jae Kwang Kim, 2016. "Likelihood-based Inference with Missing Data Under Missing-at-Random," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 43(2), pages 436-454, June.
    4. Kalouptsidis, N. & Psaraki, V., 2010. "Approximations of choice probabilities in mixed logit models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(2), pages 529-535, January.
    5. Francisco Javier Amador & Rosa Marina González & Juan de Dios Ortúzar, 2004. "Preference heterogeneity and willingness to pay for travel time," Documentos de trabajo conjunto ULL-ULPGC 2004-12, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas de la ULPGC.
    6. Varin, Cristiano & Host, Gudmund & Skare, Oivind, 2005. "Pairwise likelihood inference in spatial generalized linear mixed models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 49(4), pages 1173-1191, June.
    7. Small, Kenneth A & Winston, Clifford & Yan, Jia, 2002. "Uncovering the Distribution of Motorists' Preferences for Travel Time and Reliability: Implications for Road Pricing," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt8zd2r34k, University of California Transportation Center.
    8. Sándor, Zsolt & Train, Kenneth, 2004. "Quasi-random simulation of discrete choice models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 313-327, May.
    9. Paleti, Rajesh, 2018. "Generalized multinomial probit Model: Accommodating constrained random parameters," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 248-262.
    10. Nathan H. Miller, 2008. "Competition When Consumers Value Firm Scope," EAG Discussions Papers 200807, Department of Justice, Antitrust Division.
    11. Bhat, Chandra R., 2011. "The maximum approximate composite marginal likelihood (MACML) estimation of multinomial probit-based unordered response choice models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(7), pages 923-939, August.
    12. David Levinson & Ramachandra Karamalaputi, 2003. "Predicting the Construction of New Highway Links," Working Papers 200305, University of Minnesota: Nexus Research Group.
    13. Rizopoulos, Dimitris, 2012. "Fast fitting of joint models for longitudinal and event time data using a pseudo-adaptive Gaussian quadrature rule," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(3), pages 491-501.
    14. Meza, Cristian & Jaffrézic, Florence & Foulley, Jean-Louis, 2009. "Estimation in the probit normal model for binary outcomes using the SAEM algorithm," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 1350-1360, February.
    15. Hemant Kulkarni & Jayabrata Biswas & Kiranmoy Das, 2019. "A joint quantile regression model for multiple longitudinal outcomes," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 103(4), pages 453-473, December.
    16. Corder Nathan & Yang Shu, 2020. "Estimating Average Treatment Effects Utilizing Fractional Imputation when Confounders are Subject to Missingness," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 249-271, January.
    17. Tzougas, George & Hoon, W. L. & Lim, J. M., 2019. "The negative binomial-inverse Gaussian regression model with an application to insurance ratemaking," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 101728, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Sik-Yum Lee & Xin-Yuan Song, 2007. "A Unified Maximum Likelihood Approach for Analyzing Structural Equation Models With Missing Nonstandard Data," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 35(3), pages 352-381, February.
    19. Tatiyana V. Apanasovich & David Ruppert & Joanne R. Lupton & Natasa Popovic & Nancy D. Turner & Robert S. Chapkin & Raymond J. Carroll, 2008. "Aberrant Crypt Foci and Semiparametric Modeling of Correlated Binary Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(2), pages 490-500, June.
    20. Hai Shu & Bin Nan & Robert Koeppe, 2015. "Multiple testing for neuroimaging via hidden Markov random field," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(3), pages 741-750, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:48:y:2005:i:4:p:685-701. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.