IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v192y2025ics0960077924014875.html

An evidence-accumulating drift–diffusion model of competing information spread on networks

Author

Listed:
  • Corsin, Julien
  • Zino, Lorenzo
  • Ye, Mengbin

Abstract

In this paper, we propose an agent-based model of information spread, grounded on psychological insights on the formation and spread of beliefs. In our model, we consider a network of individuals who share two opposing types of information on a specific topic (e.g., pro- vs. anti-vaccine stances), and the accumulation of evidence supporting either type of information is modelled by means of a drift–diffusion process. After formalising the model, we put forward a campaign of Monte Carlo simulations to identify population-wide behaviours emerging from agents’ exposure to different sources of information, investigating the impact of the number and persistence of such sources, and the role of the network structure through which the individuals interact. We find similar emergent behaviours for all network structures considered. When there is a single type of information, the main observed emergent behaviour is consensus. When there are opposing information sources, both consensus or polarisation can result; the latter occurs if the number and persistence of the sources exceeds a threshold value identified in the simulations. Importantly, we find the emergent behaviour is mainly influenced by how long the information sources are present for, as opposed to how many sources there are.

Suggested Citation

  • Corsin, Julien & Zino, Lorenzo & Ye, Mengbin, 2025. "An evidence-accumulating drift–diffusion model of competing information spread on networks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:192:y:2025:i:c:s0960077924014875
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115935
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077924014875
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115935?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:plo:pone00:0175799 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Daniel A Sprague & Thomas House, 2017. "Evidence for complex contagion models of social contagion from observational data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-12, July.
    3. Acemoglu, Daron & Ozdaglar, Asuman & ParandehGheibi, Ali, 2010. "Spread of (mis)information in social networks," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 70(2), pages 194-227, November.
    4. Zhang, Wei & Brandes, Ulrik, 2023. "Conformity versus credibility: A coupled rumor-belief model," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    5. Mengbin Ye & Lorenzo Zino & Žan Mlakar & Jan Willem Bolderdijk & Hans Risselada & Bob M. Fennis & Ming Cao, 2021. "Collective patterns of social diffusion are shaped by individual inertia and trend-seeking," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    6. Lu, Peng & Yang, Hou & Li, Mengdi & Zhang, Zhuo, 2021. "The sandpile model and empire dynamics," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    7. Bulai, Iulia Martina & Sensi, Mattia & Sottile, Sara, 2024. "A geometric analysis of the SIRS compartmental model with fast information and misinformation spreading," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    8. Bjarke Mønsted & Piotr Sapieżyński & Emilio Ferrara & Sune Lehmann, 2017. "Evidence of complex contagion of information in social media: An experiment using Twitter bots," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-12, September.
    9. Nekovee, M. & Moreno, Y. & Bianconi, G. & Marsili, M., 2007. "Theory of rumour spreading in complex social networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 374(1), pages 457-470.
    10. Mohammadi, Sohameh & Nadimi-Shahraki, Mohammad H. & Beheshti, Zahra & Zamanifar, Kamran, 2024. "Improved information diffusion models based on a new two-sided sign-aware matching framework in complex networks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    11. Duncan J. Watts & Peter Sheridan Dodds, 2007. "Influentials, Networks, and Public Opinion Formation," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 34(4), pages 441-458, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ding, Fei & Liu, Yun, 2009. "A decision theoretical approach for diffusion promotion," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 388(17), pages 3572-3580.
    2. Guiyuan Fu & Hejun Liang, 2025. "The Influence of Core-Periphery Structure on Information Diffusion over Social Networks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-20, September.
    3. Borges, Henrique M. & Vasconcelos, Vítor V. & Pinheiro, Flávio L., 2024. "How social rewiring preferences bridge polarized communities," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    4. Mitja Steinbacher & Matjaž Steinbacher & Clemens Knoppe, 2024. "Opinion Dynamics with Preference Matching: How the Desire to Meet Facilitates Opinion Exchange," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 64(2), pages 735-768, August.
    5. Matjaž Steinbacher & Mitja Steinbacher, 2019. "Opinion Formation with Imperfect Agents as an Evolutionary Process," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 53(2), pages 479-505, February.
    6. Cheng, Yingying & Huo, Liang'an & Zhao, Laijun, 2022. "Stability analysis and optimal control of rumor spreading model under media coverage considering time delay and pulse vaccination," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    7. Byrka, Katarzyna & Jȩdrzejewski, Arkadiusz & Sznajd-Weron, Katarzyna & Weron, Rafał, 2016. "Difficulty is critical: The importance of social factors in modeling diffusion of green products and practices," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 723-735.
    8. Dayan, Fazal & Rafiq, Muhammad & Ahmed, Nauman & Baleanu, Dumitru & Raza, Ali & Ahmad, Muhammad Ozair & Iqbal, Muhammad, 2022. "Design and numerical analysis of fuzzy nonstandard computational methods for the solution of rumor based fuzzy epidemic model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 600(C).
    9. Huo, Liang’an & Chen, Sijing, 2020. "Rumor propagation model with consideration of scientific knowledge level and social reinforcement in heterogeneous network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 559(C).
    10. Lina Xiong, 2023. "It takes a village: examining how and when brand-specific transformational leadership affects employees in internal brand management," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 30(4), pages 333-346, July.
    11. Michael Braun & André Bonfrer, 2011. "Scalable Inference of Customer Similarities from Interactions Data Using Dirichlet Processes," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(3), pages 513-531, 05-06.
    12. Zhang, Ruixia & Li, Deyu, 2017. "Rumor propagation on networks with community structure," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 483(C), pages 375-385.
    13. Li, Dandan & Ma, Jing, 2017. "How the government’s punishment and individual’s sensitivity affect the rumor spreading in online social networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 469(C), pages 284-292.
    14. Buechel, Berno & Hellmann, Tim & Klößner, Stefan, 2015. "Opinion dynamics and wisdom under conformity," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 240-257.
    15. Foucart, Renaud & Zeng, Fanqi & Wang, Shidong, 2025. "The Social Importance of Being Stubborn When an Organization Meets AI," SocArXiv nfgy3_v1, Center for Open Science.
    16. Mueller-Frank, Manuel, 2014. "Does one Bayesian make a difference?," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 423-452.
    17. Hosni, Adil Imad Eddine & Li, Kan & Ahmad, Sadique, 2020. "Analysis of the impact of online social networks addiction on the propagation of rumors," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 542(C).
    18. Gianna Giudicati & Massimo Riccaboni & Anna Romiti, 2013. "Experience, socialization and customer retention: Lessons from the dance floor," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 409-422, December.
    19. Ben D'Exelle & Christine Gutekunst & Arno Riedl, 2025. "The Effect of Network Degree on Bargaining: Experimental Evidence from the Field," CESifo Working Paper Series 11832, CESifo.
    20. Bertrand Jayles & Ramon Escobedo & Stéphane Cezera & Adrien Blanchet & Tatsuya Kameda & Clément Sire & Guy Théraulaz, 2020. "The impact of incorrect social information on collective wisdom in human groups," Post-Print hal-03019820, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:192:y:2025:i:c:s0960077924014875. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.