IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v175y2023ip1s0960077923009128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multistability and bifurcation analysis for a three-strategy game system with public goods feedback and discrete delays

Author

Listed:
  • Cheng, Haihui
  • Meng, Xinzhu
  • Hayat, Tasawar
  • Hobiny, Aatef

Abstract

The interaction between evolution and public goods exists in social and biological systems. Exploring mathematical models that combine evolution and public goods facilitates insights and discoveries about the evolution of cooperation. We propose a third strategy called the encouragement strategy, which can reward and punish, and bear the related costs, in addition to the classical cooperation and defection strategies. We incorporate strategy and public goods dynamics to formulate a high-dimensional and high-order three-strategy evolutionary game system with public goods feedback. For this non-delayed system, we evaluate the existence of equilibria and the conditions for the occurrence of transcritical and Hopf bifurcations. Interestingly, the non-delayed system exhibits multiple multistability due to different payoffs and initial conditions. The results suggest that the environment with rich public goods is suitable for cooperators to survive. Surprisingly, raising reward does not always promote the survival of cooperators. Cooperators prevail in environments with moderate reward and severe punishment. Further, we develop a delayed system by considering information delay and production delay. For the delayed system, we investigate the properties of Hopf bifurcation, including existence, direction and stability. We find that small delays do not affect the evolutionary outcome of the strategies. However, delays larger than the critical value lead to periodic oscillations of the strategies, in which case the cooperators still have a dominant advantage. Unfortunately, larger delays can cause the disappearance of cooperators. Theoretical and numerical results show that public goods feedback, reward, punishment, payoffs, initial conditions, and delays are all significant factors in determining the outcome of strategic evolution.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheng, Haihui & Meng, Xinzhu & Hayat, Tasawar & Hobiny, Aatef, 2023. "Multistability and bifurcation analysis for a three-strategy game system with public goods feedback and discrete delays," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 175(P1).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:175:y:2023:i:p1:s0960077923009128
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2023.114011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077923009128
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2023.114011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dixit, Avinash & Olson, Mancur, 2000. "Does voluntary participation undermine the Coase Theorem?," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(3), pages 309-335, June.
    2. Zhenhua Pei & Baokui Wang & Jinming Du, 2016. "Effects of income redistribution on the evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods games," Papers 1611.01531, arXiv.org.
    3. D. Joseph Sexton & Martin Schuster, 2017. "Nutrient limitation determines the fitness of cheaters in bacterial siderophore cooperation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-8, December.
    4. Duan, Daifeng & Niu, Ben & Wei, Junjie, 2019. "Hopf-Hopf bifurcation and chaotic attractors in a delayed diffusive predator-prey model with fear effect," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 206-216.
    5. Rabin, Matthew, 1993. "Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 83(5), pages 1281-1302, December.
    6. Chen, Qin & Pan, Qiuhui & He, Mingfeng, 2022. "The influence of quasi-cooperative strategy on social dilemma evolution," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    7. Larry Samuelson, 2016. "Game Theory in Economics and Beyond," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 30(4), pages 107-130, Fall.
    8. Krawiec, Adam & Szydłowski, Marek, 2017. "Economic growth cycles driven by investment delay," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 175-183.
    9. Hommes, Cars H. & Ochea, Marius I., 2012. "Multiple equilibria and limit cycles in evolutionary games with Logit Dynamics," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 74(1), pages 434-441.
    10. Andrew R. Tilman & Joshua B. Plotkin & Erol Akçay, 2020. "Evolutionary games with environmental feedbacks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    11. R. Craig MacLean & Ivana Gudelj, 2006. "Resource competition and social conflict in experimental populations of yeast," Nature, Nature, vol. 441(7092), pages 498-501, May.
    12. Stefan Meyer & Paulo Santos & Fue Yang, 2021. "Economic games can be used to promote cooperation in the field," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 118(47), pages 2026046118-, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cason, Timothy N. & Saijo, Tatsuyoshi & Yamato, Takehiko & Yokotani, Konomu, 2004. "Non-excludable public good experiments," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 81-102, October.
    2. Daske, Thomas, 2019. "Efficient Incentives in Social Networks: "Gamification" and the Coase Theorem," EconStor Preprints 193148, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    3. Katinka Pantzy & Anthony Ziegelmeyer, 2006. "Cooperative Networks: Theory and Experimental Evidence," Papers on Strategic Interaction 2005-32, Max Planck Institute of Economics, Strategic Interaction Group.
    4. Tian-Jiao Feng & Jie Mei & Rui-Wu Wang & Sabin Lessard & Yi Tao & Xiu-Deng Zheng, 2022. "Noise-Induced Quasi-Heteroclinic Cycle in a Rock–Paper–Scissors Game with Random Payoffs," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 1280-1292, December.
    5. Patel, Amrish & Smith, Alec, 2019. "Guilt and participation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 279-295.
    6. Tatsuyoshi Saijo & Takehiko Yamato & Konomu Yokotani, 2003. "Non-Excludable Public Good Experiments revised October 2003, forthcoming in Games and Economic Behavior," Discussion papers 03011, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    7. Ederer, Florian & Stremitzer, Alexander, 2017. "Promises and expectations," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 161-178.
    8. Engelhardt, Sebastian v. & Freytag, Andreas, 2013. "Institutions, culture, and open source," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 90-110.
    9. Ellingsen, Tore & Johannesson, Magnus, 2009. "Time is not money," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 96-102, October.
    10. Falk Armin & Kosfeld Michael, 2012. "It's all about Connections: Evidence on Network Formation," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 11(3), pages 1-36, September.
    11. Michael Seiler, 2014. "The Effect of Perceived Lender Characteristics and Market Conditions on Strategic Mortgage Defaults," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 256-270, February.
    12. Delaney, Jason & Jacobson, Sarah, 2014. "Those outsiders: How downstream externalities affect public good provision," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 340-352.
    13. Anne Corcos & Yorgos Rizopoulos, 2011. "Is prosocial behavior egocentric? The “invisible hand” of emotions," Post-Print halshs-01968213, HAL.
    14. Seema Kacker & Tin Aung & Dominic Montagu & David Bishai, 2021. "Providers preferences towards greater patient health benefit is associated with higher quality of care," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 271-294, September.
    15. Gabriele Camera & Cary Deck & David Porter, 2020. "Do economic inequalities affect long-run cooperation and prosperity?," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 23(1), pages 53-83, March.
    16. Thomas Dohmen & Armin Falk & David Huffman & Uwe Sunde, 2009. "Homo Reciprocans: Survey Evidence on Behavioural Outcomes," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 119(536), pages 592-612, March.
    17. Dickinson, David L. & Masclet, David, 2019. "Using ethical dilemmas to predict antisocial choices with real payoff consequences: An experimental study," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 195-215.
    18. Adrian Bruhin & Ernst Fehr & Daniel Schunk, 2019. "The many Faces of Human Sociality: Uncovering the Distribution and Stability of Social Preferences," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 17(4), pages 1025-1069.
    19. Vollmer Uwe, 2004. "Streissler, E.W. (Hrsg.), Studien zur Entwicklung der ökonomischen Theorie XIX," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 224(6), pages 758-759, December.
    20. Emin Karagözoğlu & Elif Tosun, 2022. "Endogenous Game Choice and Giving Behavior in Distribution Games," Games, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-32, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:175:y:2023:i:p1:s0960077923009128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.