IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v390y2025ics0306261925005264.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Security-constrained unit commitment: Modeling, solutions and evaluations

Author

Listed:
  • Latify, Mohammad Amin
  • Mokhtari, Ali
  • Alavi-Eshkaftaki, Amin
  • Rajaei Najafabadi, Fatemeh
  • Hashemian, Seyed Nasrollah
  • Khaleghizadeh, Ali
  • Nezamabadi, Hossein
  • Yousefi Ramandi, Mostafa
  • Mozdawar, Seyed Alireza
  • Hatziargyriou, Nikos D.
  • Hacopian Dolatabadi, Sarineh

Abstract

Unit commitment has been widely studied in the last few decades due to its importance in power systems operation. To ensure the reliability and feasibility of the operational constraints of the transmission network, the system operator needs to solve this problem, considering the security constraints. In this problem, the total operational costs during each day are minimized while considering all operational constraints of the generation units and the transmission network under various contingencies. Solving this problem in large networks is associated with many challenges, such as solution time and accuracy. From the perspective of the optimization literature, it is a high-dimensional non-convex problem. Different methods have been presented to solve the security-constrained unit commitment (SCUC). This paper presents a comprehensive and practical overview of the SCUC as a critical decision-making problem to determine optimal power generation schedules in the power system by investigating the most critical studies on this topic and providing a detailed classification of both modeling and problem-solving approaches for the existing real electricity markets. It also outlines the existing research challenges in this field by implementing test benchmarks on different types of SCUC problems and provides deep and novel insights. First, the various models available for this problem are summarized. Then, the different methods proposed to solve this problem are explained based on their characteristics and application scopes, are comprehensively categorized, and the corresponding solution methods are discussed. Finally, various methods are evaluated and compared through numerical case studies on benchmark formulations, and the potential future research directions in this field are proposed.

Suggested Citation

  • Latify, Mohammad Amin & Mokhtari, Ali & Alavi-Eshkaftaki, Amin & Rajaei Najafabadi, Fatemeh & Hashemian, Seyed Nasrollah & Khaleghizadeh, Ali & Nezamabadi, Hossein & Yousefi Ramandi, Mostafa & Mozdawa, 2025. "Security-constrained unit commitment: Modeling, solutions and evaluations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 390(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:390:y:2025:i:c:s0306261925005264
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125796
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925005264
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125796?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiang, Sufan & Gao, Shan & Pan, Guangsheng & Liu, Yu & Wu, Chuanshen & Wang, Sicheng, 2021. "Congestion-aware robust security constrained unit commitment model for AC-DC grids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    2. Roald, Line A. & Pozo, David & Papavasiliou, Anthony & Molzahn, Daniel K. & Kazempour, Jalal & Conejo, Antonio, 2023. "Power systems optimization under uncertainty: a review of methods and applications," LIDAM Reprints CORE 3257, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    3. Ignacio Herrero & Pablo Rodilla & Carlos Batlle, 2020. "Evolving Bidding Formats and Pricing Schemes in USA and Europe Day-Ahead Electricity Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-21, September.
    4. Anthony Papavasiliou & Shmuel S. Oren, 2013. "Multiarea Stochastic Unit Commitment for High Wind Penetration in a Transmission Constrained Network," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(3), pages 578-592, June.
    5. Jiang, Sufan & Gao, Shan & Pan, Guangsheng & Zhao, Xin & Liu, Yu & Guo, Yasen & Wang, Sicheng, 2020. "A novel robust security constrained unit commitment model considering HVDC regulation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    6. Álinson S. Xavier & Feng Qiu & Shabbir Ahmed, 2021. "Learning to Solve Large-Scale Security-Constrained Unit Commitment Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 739-756, May.
    7. Hacopian Dolatabadi, Sarineh & Latify, Mohammad Amin & Karshenas, Hamidreza & Sharifi, Alimorad, 2022. "On pricing issues in electricity markets in the presence of externalities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    8. Abdi, Hamdi, 2021. "Profit-based unit commitment problem: A review of models, methods, challenges, and future directions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    9. Bernard Knueven & James Ostrowski & Jean-Paul Watson, 2020. "On Mixed-Integer Programming Formulations for the Unit Commitment Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 857-876, October.
    10. Cristian Camilo Marín-Cano & Juan Esteban Sierra-Aguilar & Jesús M. López-Lezama & Álvaro Jaramillo-Duque & Walter M. Villa-Acevedo, 2019. "Implementation of User Cuts and Linear Sensitivity Factors to Improve the Computational Performance of the Security-Constrained Unit Commitment Problem," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, April.
    11. Álinson Santos Xavier & Santanu Subhas Dey & Feng Qiu, 2024. "Decomposable Formulation of Transmission Constraints for Decentralized Power Systems Optimization," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 36(6), pages 1562-1578, December.
    12. Ying-Yi Hong & Gerard Francesco DG. Apolinario, 2021. "Uncertainty in Unit Commitment in Power Systems: A Review of Models, Methods, and Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-47, October.
    13. Richard Li-Yang Chen & Neng Fan & Ali Pinar & Jean-Paul Watson, 2017. "Contingency-constrained unit commitment with post-contingency corrective recourse," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 249(1), pages 381-407, February.
    14. Antonio J. Conejo & Miguel Carrión & Juan M. Morales, 2010. "Decision Making Under Uncertainty in Electricity Markets," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, number 978-1-4419-7421-1, December.
    15. Pascale Bendotti & Pierre Fouilhoux & Cécile Rottner, 2019. "On the complexity of the Unit Commitment Problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 274(1), pages 119-130, March.
    16. Mokhtari, Ali & Latify, Mohammad Amin & Zakeri, Yadollah, 2025. "Temperature-dependent performance of CCGTs: Unit commitment analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 318(C).
    17. PAPAVASILIOU, Anthony & OREN, Schmuel S., 2013. "Multiarea stochastic unit commitment for high wind penetration in a transmission constrained network," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2500, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    18. Akhlaghi, M. & Moravej, Z. & Bagheri, A., 2022. "Maximizing wind energy utilization in smart power systems using a flexible network-constrained unit commitment through dynamic lines and transformers rating," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    19. Quan, Hao & Srinivasan, Dipti & Khambadkone, Ashwin M. & Khosravi, Abbas, 2015. "A computational framework for uncertainty integration in stochastic unit commitment with intermittent renewable energy sources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 71-82.
    20. Jiang, Boyou & Guo, Chuangxin & Chen, Zhe, 2024. "Frequency constrained unit commitment considering reserve provision of wind power," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 361(C).
    21. Fan, Lei & Pan, Kai & Guan, Yongpei, 2019. "A strengthened mixed-integer linear programming formulation for combined-cycle units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(3), pages 865-881.
    22. Hacopian Dolatabadi, Sarineh & Latify, Mohammad Amin & Karshenas, Hamidreza & Sharifi, Alimorad, 2024. "Demand response mechanisms: A new debate on internalizing power generation sector negative technical spillovers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    23. Constante-Flores, Gonzalo E. & Conejo, Antonio J. & Qiu, Feng, 2024. "Daily scheduling of generating units with natural-gas market constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 313(1), pages 387-399.
    24. Bai, Yang & Zhong, Haiwang & Xia, Qing & Kang, Chongqing & Xie, Le, 2015. "A decomposition method for network-constrained unit commitment with AC power flow constraints," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 595-603.
    25. Basu, Mousumi, 2023. "Fuel constrained commitment scheduling for combined heat and power dispatch incorporating electric vehicle parking lot," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    26. Qiangyi Sha & Weiqing Wang & Haiyun Wang, 2021. "A Distributionally Robust Chance-Constrained Unit Commitment with N-1 Security and Renewable Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-21, September.
    27. Constante-Flores, Gonzalo E. & Conejo, Antonio J., 2024. "Security-constrained unit commitment: A decomposition approach embodying Kron reduction," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 319(2), pages 427-441.
    28. PAPAVASILIOU, Anthony & OREN, Shmuel & ROUNTREE, Barry, 2015. "Applying high performance computing to transmissions-consstrained stochastic unit commitment for renewable energy integration," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2679, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    29. Kathryn M. Schumacher & Amy E. M. Cohn & Richard Li-Yang Chen, 2017. "Algorithm for the N -2 Security-Constrained Unit Commitment Problem with Transmission Switching," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 645-659, November.
    30. Mansourshoar, Paria & Yazdankhah, Ahmad Sadeghi & Vatanpour, Mohsen & Mohammadi-Ivatloo, Behnam, 2022. "Impact of implementing a price-based demand response program on the system reliability in security-constrained unit commitment problem coupled with wind farms in the presence of contingencies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    31. Jianqiu Huang & Kai Pan & Yongpei Guan, 2021. "Cutting planes for security-constrained unit commitment with regulation reserve," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(4), pages 437-452, April.
    32. Luis Montero & Antonio Bello & Javier Reneses, 2022. "A Review on the Unit Commitment Problem: Approaches, Techniques, and Resolution Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-40, February.
    33. C. Gentile & G. Morales-España & A. Ramos, 2017. "A tight MIP formulation of the unit commitment problem with start-up and shut-down constraints," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 5(1), pages 177-201, March.
    34. Liu, Jingfan & Zhang, Shijie, 2025. "Stochastic two-stage multi-objective unit commitment of distributed resource energy systems considering uncertainties and unit failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Qian & Qi, Jingwen & Zhen, Lu, 2023. "Optimization of integrated energy system considering multi-energy collaboration in carbon-free hydrogen port," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    2. Luis Montero & Antonio Bello & Javier Reneses, 2022. "A Review on the Unit Commitment Problem: Approaches, Techniques, and Resolution Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-40, February.
    3. De Vos, K. & Stevens, N. & Devolder, O. & Papavasiliou, A. & Hebb, B. & Matthys-Donnadieu, J., 2019. "Dynamic dimensioning approach for operating reserves: Proof of concept in Belgium," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 272-285.
    4. Bunnak, Phumthep & Coniglio, Stefano & Galelli, Stefano, 2025. "Bridging theory and practice: Efficiently solving the unit commitment problem in production cost models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    5. Bahar Cennet Okumuşoğlu & Beste Basciftci & Burak Kocuk, 2024. "An Integrated Predictive Maintenance and Operations Scheduling Framework for Power Systems Under Failure Uncertainty," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 36(5), pages 1335-1358, September.
    6. ARAVENA, Ignacio & PAPAVASILIOU, Anthony, 2016. "An Asynchronous Distributed Algorithm for solving Stochastic Unit Commitment," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2016038, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    7. Hohl, Cody & Lo Prete, Chiara & Radhakrishnan, Ashish & Webster, Mort, 2023. "Intraday markets, wind integration and uplift payments in a regional U.S. power system," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    8. Fattahi, Salar & Ashraphijuo, Morteza & Lavaei, Javad & Atamtürk, Alper, 2017. "Conic relaxations of the unit commitment problem," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 1079-1095.
    9. Jianqiu Huang & Kai Pan & Yongpei Guan, 2021. "Multistage Stochastic Power Generation Scheduling Co-Optimizing Energy and Ancillary Services," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 352-369, January.
    10. Skolfield, J. Kyle & Escobedo, Adolfo R., 2022. "Operations research in optimal power flow: A guide to recent and emerging methodologies and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(2), pages 387-404.
    11. Prakash, Abhijith & Bruce, Anna & MacGill, Iain, 2025. "The scheduling role of future pricing information in electricity markets with rising deployments of energy storage: An Australian National Electricity Market case study," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    12. Doubleday, Kate & Lara, José Daniel & Hodge, Bri-Mathias, 2022. "Investigation of stochastic unit commitment to enable advanced flexibility measures for high shares of solar PV," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    13. Daraeepour, Ali & Patino-Echeverri, Dalia & Conejo, Antonio J., 2019. "Economic and environmental implications of different approaches to hedge against wind production uncertainty in two-settlement electricity markets: A PJM case study," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 336-354.
    14. Álvaro Lorca & X. Andy Sun & Eugene Litvinov & Tongxin Zheng, 2016. "Multistage Adaptive Robust Optimization for the Unit Commitment Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 32-51, February.
    15. Li, Chaoshun & Wang, Wenxiao & Wang, Jinwen & Chen, Deshu, 2019. "Network-constrained unit commitment with RE uncertainty and PHES by using a binary artificial sheep algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    16. Faezeh Akhavizadegan & Lizhi Wang & James McCalley, 2020. "Scenario Selection for Iterative Stochastic Transmission Expansion Planning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, March.
    17. Noori, Ehsan & Khazaei, Ehsan & Tavaro, Mehdi & Bardideh, Farhad, 2019. "Economically Operation of Power Utilities Base on MILP Approach," MPRA Paper 95910, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Howard, B. & Waite, M. & Modi, V., 2017. "Current and near-term GHG emissions factors from electricity production for New York State and New York City," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 255-271.
    19. Wang, Wenxiao & Li, Chaoshun & Liao, Xiang & Qin, Hui, 2017. "Study on unit commitment problem considering pumped storage and renewable energy via a novel binary artificial sheep algorithm," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 612-626.
    20. Hain, Martin & Kargus, Tobias & Schermeyer, Hans & Uhrig-Homburg, Marliese & Fichtner, Wolf, 2022. "An electricity price modeling framework for renewable-dominant markets," Working Paper Series in Production and Energy 66, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Industrial Production (IIP).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:390:y:2025:i:c:s0306261925005264. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.