IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v322y2025ics0360544225010965.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bridging theory and practice: Efficiently solving the unit commitment problem in production cost models

Author

Listed:
  • Bunnak, Phumthep
  • Coniglio, Stefano
  • Galelli, Stefano

Abstract

High-fidelity Production Cost Models are tools for scheduling the operations of power systems, but their computational complexity often necessitates trade-offs in model detail or solution quality. We argue that there are tangible opportunities for resolving this trade-off, or at least mitigating it. To explore this hypothesis, we contribute a holistic approach that simultaneously addresses both model building and solution process. Our model building relies on recent advances in the formulation of Unit Commitment Problems, while our solution processes is based on two novel heuristics (iterative rounding and column generation) that exploit specific attributes of the unit commitment problem. Extensive computational experiments carried out on country-scale grids (Laos, Cambodia, and Thailand) show that iterative rounding achieves substantial speed-ups (up to 10x) while maintaining an average optimality gap of no more than 1% with respect to our benchmark solver (Gurobi). Notably, this heuristic also scales very well with the problem size. Column generation is less successful in terms of runtime, but demonstrate potential for instances characterized by high penetration of renewables. Both heuristics are solver independent, allowing a seamless integration with virtually any mathematical-programming solver. The diverse characteristics of the power systems we experimented on further indicates the generalizability of the proposed heuristics, highlighting their potential to improve the computational efficiency of production cost modeling.

Suggested Citation

  • Bunnak, Phumthep & Coniglio, Stefano & Galelli, Stefano, 2025. "Bridging theory and practice: Efficiently solving the unit commitment problem in production cost models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:322:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225010965
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.135454
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225010965
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2025.135454?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ali, E.S. & Elazim, S.M. Abd & Balobaid, A.S., 2023. "Implementation of coyote optimization algorithm for solving unit commitment problem in power systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PA).
    2. Collins, Seán & Deane, John Paul & Poncelet, Kris & Panos, Evangelos & Pietzcker, Robert C. & Delarue, Erik & Ó Gallachóir, Brian Pádraig, 2017. "Integrating short term variations of the power system into integrated energy system models: A methodological review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 839-856.
    3. Álinson S. Xavier & Feng Qiu & Shabbir Ahmed, 2021. "Learning to Solve Large-Scale Security-Constrained Unit Commitment Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 739-756, May.
    4. Bernard Knueven & James Ostrowski & Jean-Paul Watson, 2020. "On Mixed-Integer Programming Formulations for the Unit Commitment Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 857-876, October.
    5. Teichgraeber, Holger & Lindenmeyer, Constantin P. & Baumgärtner, Nils & Kotzur, Leander & Stolten, Detlef & Robinius, Martin & Bardow, André & Brandt, Adam R., 2020. "Extreme events in time series aggregation: A case study for optimal residential energy supply systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    6. Zhu, Xiaodong & Zhao, Shihao & Yang, Zhile & Zhang, Ning & Xu, Xinzhi, 2022. "A parallel meta-heuristic method for solving large scale unit commitment considering the integration of new energy sectors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PC).
    7. Cebulla, F. & Fichter, T., 2017. "Merit order or unit-commitment: How does thermal power plant modeling affect storage demand in energy system models?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 117-132.
    8. Pascale Bendotti & Pierre Fouilhoux & Cécile Rottner, 2019. "On the complexity of the Unit Commitment Problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 274(1), pages 119-130, March.
    9. WOLSEY, Laurence A., 1989. "Strong formulations for mixed integer programming: a survey," LIDAM Reprints CORE 864, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    10. Stefano Galelli & Thanh Duc Dang & Jia Yi Ng & A. F. M. Kamal Chowdhury & Mauricio E. Arias, 2022. "Opportunities to curb hydrological alterations via dam re-operation in the Mekong," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 5(12), pages 1058-1069, December.
    11. Voorspools, Kris R. & D'haeseleer, William D., 2003. "Long-term Unit Commitment optimisation for large power systems: unit decommitment versus advanced priority listing," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(1-3), pages 157-167, September.
    12. Maurice QUEYRANNE & Laurence A. WOLSEY, 2017. "Tight MIP formulations for bounded up/down times and interval-dependent start-ups," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2876, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    13. Wyatt Arnold & Matteo Giuliani & Andrea Castelletti, 2024. "Floating photovoltaics may reduce the risk of hydro-dominated energy development in Africa," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 9(5), pages 602-611, May.
    14. Koh, Rachel & Kern, Jordan & Galelli, Stefano, 2022. "Hard-coupling water and power system models increases the complementarity of renewable energy sources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    15. Takayuki Shiina & Takahiro Yurugi & Susumu Morito & Jun Imaizumi, 2016. "Unit Commitment by Column Generation," Operations Research Proceedings, in: Marco Lübbecke & Arie Koster & Peter Letmathe & Reinhard Madlener & Britta Peis & Grit Walther (ed.), Operations Research Proceedings 2014, edition 1, pages 559-565, Springer.
    16. Timo Berthold, 2008. "Heuristics of the Branch-Cut-and-Price-Framework SCIP," Operations Research Proceedings, in: Jörg Kalcsics & Stefan Nickel (ed.), Operations Research Proceedings 2007, pages 31-36, Springer.
    17. Francisco Ralston Fonseca & Paulina Jaramillo & Mario Bergés & Edson Severnini, 2019. "Seasonal effects of climate change on intra-day electricity demand patterns," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 154(3), pages 435-451, June.
    18. Tobias Achterberg & Timo Berthold & Gregor Hendel, 2012. "Rounding and Propagation Heuristics for Mixed Integer Programming," Operations Research Proceedings, in: Diethard Klatte & Hans-Jakob Lüthi & Karl Schmedders (ed.), Operations Research Proceedings 2011, edition 127, pages 71-76, Springer.
    19. Rehfeldt, Daniel & Hobbie, Hannes & Schönheit, David & Koch, Thorsten & Möst, Dominik & Gleixner, Ambros, 2022. "A massively parallel interior-point solver for LPs with generalized arrowhead structure, and applications to energy system models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(1), pages 60-71.
    20. Poncelet, Kris & Delarue, Erik & Six, Daan & Duerinck, Jan & D’haeseleer, William, 2016. "Impact of the level of temporal and operational detail in energy-system planning models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 631-643.
    21. S. W. D. Turner & N. Voisin & J. Fazio & D. Hua & M. Jourabchi, 2019. "Compound climate events transform electrical power shortfall risk in the Pacific Northwest," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-8, December.
    22. Teichgraeber, Holger & Brandt, Adam R., 2019. "Clustering methods to find representative periods for the optimization of energy systems: An initial framework and comparison," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 1283-1293.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Göke, Leonard & Kendziorski, Mario, 2022. "Adequacy of time-series reduction for renewable energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    2. Merrick, James H. & Bistline, John E.T. & Blanford, Geoffrey J., 2024. "On representation of energy storage in electricity planning models," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    3. Tian, Zhe & Wang, Yi & Li, Xiaoyuan & Wen, Li & Niu, Jide & Lu, Yakai, 2024. "Typical daily scenario extraction method based on key features to promote building renewable energy system optimization efficiency," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    4. Latify, Mohammad Amin & Mokhtari, Ali & Alavi-Eshkaftaki, Amin & Rajaei Najafabadi, Fatemeh & Hashemian, Seyed Nasrollah & Khaleghizadeh, Ali & Nezamabadi, Hossein & Yousefi Ramandi, Mostafa & Mozdawa, 2025. "Security-constrained unit commitment: Modeling, solutions and evaluations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 390(C).
    5. Hilbers, Adriaan P. & Brayshaw, David J. & Gandy, Axel, 2023. "Reducing climate risk in energy system planning: A posteriori time series aggregation for models with storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 334(C).
    6. Kai Pan & Ming Zhao & Chung-Lun Li & Feng Qiu, 2022. "A Polyhedral Study on Fuel-Constrained Unit Commitment," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(6), pages 3309-3324, November.
    7. Yeganefar, Ali & Amin-Naseri, Mohammad Reza & Sheikh-El-Eslami, Mohammad Kazem, 2020. "Improvement of representative days selection in power system planning by incorporating the extreme days of the net load to take account of the variability and intermittency of renewable resources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    8. Luis Montero & Antonio Bello & Javier Reneses, 2022. "A Review on the Unit Commitment Problem: Approaches, Techniques, and Resolution Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-40, February.
    9. Hoffmann, Maximilian & Kotzur, Leander & Stolten, Detlef, 2022. "The Pareto-optimal temporal aggregation of energy system models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    10. Teichgraeber, Holger & Brandt, Adam R., 2022. "Time-series aggregation for the optimization of energy systems: Goals, challenges, approaches, and opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    11. Pavičević, Matija & Kavvadias, Konstantinos & Pukšec, Tomislav & Quoilin, Sylvain, 2019. "Comparison of different model formulations for modelling future power systems with high shares of renewables – The Dispa-SET Balkans model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 1-1.
    12. Kuepper, Lucas Elias & Teichgraeber, Holger & Baumgärtner, Nils & Bardow, André & Brandt, Adam R., 2022. "Wind data introduce error in time-series reduction for capacity expansion modelling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    13. Hossein Lotfi & Mohammad Hasan Nikkhah, 2024. "Multi-Objective Profit-Based Unit Commitment with Renewable Energy and Energy Storage Units Using a Modified Optimization Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-28, February.
    14. Srihari Sundar & Michael T. Craig & Ashley E. Payne & David J. Brayshaw & Flavio Lehner, 2023. "Meteorological drivers of resource adequacy failures in current and high renewable Western U.S. power systems," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    15. Chang, Miguel & Lund, Henrik & Thellufsen, Jakob Zinck & Østergaard, Poul Alberg, 2023. "Perspectives on purpose-driven coupling of energy system models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    16. Seljom, Pernille & Kvalbein, Lisa & Hellemo, Lars & Kaut, Michal & Ortiz, Miguel Muñoz, 2021. "Stochastic modelling of variable renewables in long-term energy models: Dataset, scenario generation & quality of results," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    17. Prina, Matteo Giacomo & Nastasi, Benedetto & Groppi, Daniele & Misconel, Steffi & Garcia, Davide Astiaso & Sparber, Wolfram, 2022. "Comparison methods of energy system frameworks, models and scenario results," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    18. Poncelet, Kris & Delarue, Erik & D’haeseleer, William, 2020. "Unit commitment constraints in long-term planning models: Relevance, pitfalls and the role of assumptions on flexibility," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    19. Backe, Stian & Ahang, Mohammadreza & Tomasgard, Asgeir, 2021. "Stable stochastic capacity expansion with variable renewables: Comparing moment matching and stratified scenario generation sampling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    20. Wei, Lishen & Ai, Xiaomeng & Fang, Jiakun & Cui, Shichang & Gao, Liqian & Li, Kun & Wen, Jinyu, 2025. "Data-augmentation acceleration framework by graph neural network for near-optimal unit commitment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 377(PD).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:322:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225010965. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.