IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v377y2025ipds0306261924020488.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic expansion planning of a commercial virtual power plant through coalition with distributed energy resources considering rival competitors

Author

Listed:
  • Maiz, Santiago
  • Baringo, Luis
  • García-Bertrand, Raquel

Abstract

We consider a virtual power plant (VPP) that expands its capacity by forming a coalition with decentralized energy resources (DERs) such as controllable and renewable power plants, as well as with energy storage systems and flexible demands. The VPP competes with rival VPPs to aggregate the DERs to its own portfolio. This problem is formulated as a three-stage stochastic bi-level model, where the expected profit of the VPP is maximized in the upper-level problem, while the lower-level problems deal with the decisions of each DER regarding the selection of VPP. In the first stage, the VPP manager places bids to secure each DER auction. The second stage involves decisions to determine the DER auctions, forming the VPP coalition and the procurement of power from the day-ahead market. Uncertainties in this stage include bid prices of rival VPPs and the minimum selling price of DERs. Finally, in the third stage, the expanded VPP determines its optimal operation and manages uncertainties related to renewable energy production levels and market prices. The conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) is incorporated into the model as a risk metric to deal with the profit risk associated with the decisions of the VPP manager. The duration of the coalition forming is mid-term, spanning one month. To reduce the computational burden of the problem, the variability of parameters such as market prices and renewable energy production levels (both solar and wind) is modeled using representative days generated by a clustering K-medoids method. Through a case study using data from the Spanish electricity market, it is demonstrated that weather conditions and electricity demand significantly influence the coalition formation.

Suggested Citation

  • Maiz, Santiago & Baringo, Luis & García-Bertrand, Raquel, 2025. "Dynamic expansion planning of a commercial virtual power plant through coalition with distributed energy resources considering rival competitors," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 377(PD).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:377:y:2025:i:pd:s0306261924020488
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124665
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261924020488
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124665?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephanie Rosenkranz & Patrick W. Schmitz, 2007. "Reserve Prices in Auctions as Reference Points," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 117(520), pages 637-653, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shunda, Nicholas, 2009. "Auctions with a buy price: The case of reference-dependent preferences," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 645-664, November.
    2. Onur A. Koska & Frank Stähler, 2017. "When should bidders learn reserve prices?," ERC Working Papers 1712, ERC - Economic Research Center, Middle East Technical University, revised Oct 2017.
    3. Jidong Zhou, 2011. "Reference Dependence and Market Competition," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(4), pages 1073-1097, December.
    4. Arbel, Yuval & Ben-Shahar, Danny & Gabriel, Stuart, 2014. "Anchoring and housing choice: Results of a natural policy experiment," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 68-83.
    5. Florian Englmaier & Arno Schmöller, 2008. "Reserve Price Formation in Online Auctions," CESifo Working Paper Series 2374, CESifo.
    6. Sibly, Hugh, 2007. "Loss aversion, price and quality," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 771-788, October.
    7. Schlosser, William E., 2020. "Real price appreciation forecast tool: Two delivered log market price cycles in the Puget Sound markets of western Washington, USA, from 1992 through 2019," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    8. Syngjoo Choi & Lars Nesheim & Imran Rasul, 2016. "Reserve Price Effects In Auctions: Estimates From Multiple Regression-Discontinuity Designs," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 54(1), pages 294-314, January.
    9. Han-Jang No & Dai-Won Kim & Jung-Suk Yu, 2017. "Do Reserve Prices Yield Reference Price Effects in Korean Court Auctions of Residential Real Estate?," International Real Estate Review, Global Social Science Institute, vol. 20(1), pages 75-104.
    10. Rosar, Frank, 2014. "Secret reserve prices in first-price auctions," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 65-74.
    11. Mariano Gabriel Runco, 2020. "Reference-Dependent Preferences and Overbidding in Private and Common Value Auctions," International Journal of Applied Behavioral Economics (IJABE), IGI Global, vol. 9(2), pages 20-37, April.
    12. Alex Dickson & Colin Jennings & Gary Koop, 2016. "Domestic Violence and Football in Glasgow: Are Reference Points Relevant?," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 78(1), pages 1-21, February.
    13. Englmaier, Florian & Schmöller, Arno, 2010. "Determinants and Effects of Reserve Prices in Hattrick Auctions," Discussion Paper Series of SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems 326, Free University of Berlin, Humboldt University of Berlin, University of Bonn, University of Mannheim, University of Munich.
    14. Ziyi Tan & Shulin Liu, 2022. "The Generalized First- and Second-Price Auctions: Overbidding, Underbidding, and Optimal Reserve Price," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, January.
    15. Ahrens, Steffen & Pirschel, Inske & Snower, Dennis J., 2017. "A theory of price adjustment under loss aversion," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 78-95.
    16. Zhang, Yunyi & Gong, Pu, 2018. "IPV model with Cobb–Douglas and reference-dependent utility functions," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 510(C), pages 121-131.
    17. Peyman Khezr, 2018. "Why Sellers Avoid Auctions: Theory and Evidence," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 163-182, February.
    18. Tanjim Hossain & Fahad Khalil & Matthew Shum, 2016. "Auctioneers as Market Makers: Managing Momentum in Chittagong Tea Auctions," CESifo Working Paper Series 5843, CESifo.
    19. Schmöller, Arno, 2010. "Bidding Behavior, Seller Strategies, and the Utilization of Information in Auctions for Complex Goods," Munich Dissertations in Economics 11175, University of Munich, Department of Economics.
    20. Trautmann, Stefan T. & Traxler, Christian, 2010. "Reserve prices as reference points - Evidence from auctions for football players at Hattrick.org," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 230-240, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:377:y:2025:i:pd:s0306261924020488. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.