IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v298y2021ics0306261921006851.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic evaluation of battery storage systems bidding on day-ahead and automatic frequency restoration reserves markets

Author

Listed:
  • Nitsch, Felix
  • Deissenroth-Uhrig, Marc
  • Schimeczek, Christoph
  • Bertsch, Valentin

Abstract

In future electricity systems, not only electricity generation but also frequency stabilization must be provided by low-carbon technologies. Battery systems are a promising solution to fill this gap. However, uncertainties regarding their revenue potential may hinder investments. Therefore, we apply the agent-based electricity market model AMIRIS to simulate a day-ahead market and an automatic frequency restoration reserves market. Demonstrating the model setup, we chose a scenario with high shares of renewable energies. First, we back-test our model with historic market data from Germany in 2019. The simulation results’ mean day-ahead prices of 39.20EUR/MWh are close to the historic ones of 38.70EUR/MWh. Second, we model both markets in a scenario for 2030. The simulated day-ahead market prices are higher on average than observed today, although, we find around 550 h/yr in which the load is fully covered by renewable energies. The variance in simulated prices is slightly higher compared to historic values. Bids on the reserve capacity market are derived from opportunity costs of not participating in the day-ahead market. This results in prices of up to 45EUR/MW for positive reserve while the prices for negative reserve are 0EUR/MW. Finally, we evaluate revenue potentials of battery storages. Compared to 2019, we see an improved economic potential and increased importance of the day-ahead market. High power battery storages perform best whereas improvements in round-trip efficiency only marginally improve revenues. Although demonstrated for Germany, the presented modular approach can be adapted to international markets enabling comprehensive battery storage assessments.

Suggested Citation

  • Nitsch, Felix & Deissenroth-Uhrig, Marc & Schimeczek, Christoph & Bertsch, Valentin, 2021. "Economic evaluation of battery storage systems bidding on day-ahead and automatic frequency restoration reserves markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:298:y:2021:i:c:s0306261921006851
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117267
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261921006851
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117267?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rodrigues, Daniel L. & Ye, Xianming & Xia, Xiaohua & Zhu, Bing, 2020. "Battery energy storage sizing optimisation for different ownership structures in a peer-to-peer energy sharing community," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    2. Pusceddu, Elian & Zakeri, Behnam & Castagneto Gissey, Giorgio, 2021. "Synergies between energy arbitrage and fast frequency response for battery energy storage systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    3. Angenendt, Georg & Merten, Michael & Zurmühlen, Sebastian & Sauer, Dirk Uwe, 2020. "Evaluation of the effects of frequency restoration reserves market participation with photovoltaic battery energy storage systems and power-to-heat coupling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    4. Merten, Michael & Rücker, Fabian & Schoeneberger, Ilka & Sauer, Dirk Uwe, 2020. "Automatic frequency restoration reserve market prediction: Methodology and comparison of various approaches," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    5. Dr. Christian Lutz & Dr. Markus Flaute & Dr. Ulrike Lehr & Dr. Andreas Kemmler & Dr. Almut Kirchner & Alex auf der Maur & Inka Ziegenhagen & Marco Wünsch & Sylvie Koziel & Dr. Alexander Piégsa & Samue, 2018. "Gesamtwirtschaftliche Effekte der Energiewende," GWS Research Report Series 18-4, GWS - Institute of Economic Structures Research.
    6. Petr Spodniak, Valentin Bertsch, and Mel Devine, 2021. "The Profitability of Energy Storage in European Electricity Markets," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 5).
    7. Weitemeyer, Stefan & Kleinhans, David & Vogt, Thomas & Agert, Carsten, 2015. "Integration of Renewable Energy Sources in future power systems: The role of storage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 14-20.
    8. Limpens, Gauthier & Moret, Stefano & Jeanmart, Hervé & Maréchal, Francois, 2019. "EnergyScope TD: A novel open-source model for regional energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    9. Huang, Qisheng & Xu, Yunjian & Courcoubetis, Costas, 2020. "Stackelberg competition between merchant and regulated storage investment in wholesale electricity markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    10. Tesfatsion, Leigh, 2006. "Agent-Based Computational Economics: A Constructive Approach to Economic Theory," Handbook of Computational Economics, in: Leigh Tesfatsion & Kenneth L. Judd (ed.), Handbook of Computational Economics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 16, pages 831-880, Elsevier.
    11. Wierzbowski, Michal & Lyzwa, Wojciech & Musial, Izabela, 2016. "MILP model for long-term energy mix planning with consideration of power system reserves," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 93-111.
    12. Shabani, Masoume & Dahlquist, Erik & Wallin, Fredrik & Yan, Jinyue, 2020. "Techno-economic comparison of optimal design of renewable-battery storage and renewable micro pumped hydro storage power supply systems: A case study in Sweden," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    13. Merten, Michael & Olk, Christopher & Schoeneberger, Ilka & Sauer, Dirk Uwe, 2020. "Bidding strategy for battery storage systems in the secondary control reserve market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    14. Braeuer, Fritz & Rominger, Julian & McKenna, Russell & Fichtner, Wolf, 2019. "Battery storage systems: An economic model-based analysis of parallel revenue streams and general implications for industry," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 1424-1440.
    15. Marc Deissenroth & Martin Klein & Kristina Nienhaus & Matthias Reeg, 2017. "Assessing the Plurality of Actors and Policy Interactions: Agent-Based Modelling of Renewable Energy Market Integration," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-24, December.
    16. Iria, José & Soares, Filipe & Matos, Manuel, 2019. "Optimal bidding strategy for an aggregator of prosumers in energy and secondary reserve markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 1361-1372.
    17. Berrada, Asmae & Loudiyi, Khalid & Zorkani, Izeddine, 2016. "Valuation of energy storage in energy and regulation markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 1109-1118.
    18. Hirth, Lion & Ziegenhagen, Inka, 2015. "Balancing power and variable renewables: Three links," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 1035-1051.
    19. Ocker, Fabian & Ehrhart, Karl-Martin & Belica, Matej, 2018. "Harmonization of the European balancing power auction: A game-theoretical and empirical investigation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 194-211.
    20. Yael Parag & Benjamin K. Sovacool, 2016. "Electricity market design for the prosumer era," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 1(4), pages 1-6, April.
    21. Swider, Derk J. & Weber, Christoph, 2007. "Bidding under price uncertainty in multi-unit pay-as-bid procurement auctions for power systems reserve," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(3), pages 1297-1308, September.
    22. Fabian Ocker & Karl‐Martin Ehrhart & Marion Ott, 2018. "Bidding strategies in Austrian and German balancing power auctions," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(6), November.
    23. Engels, Jonas & Claessens, Bert & Deconinck, Geert, 2019. "Techno-economic analysis and optimal control of battery storage for frequency control services, applied to the German market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 1036-1049.
    24. Chao, Hung-Po & Wilson, Robert, 2002. "Multi-dimensional Procurement Auctions for Power Reserves: Robust Incentive-Compatible Scoring and Settlement Rules," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 161-183, September.
    25. Ottesen, Stig Ødegaard & Tomasgard, Asgeir & Fleten, Stein-Erik, 2018. "Multi market bidding strategies for demand side flexibility aggregators in electricity markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 120-134.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pavić, Ivan & Čović, Nikolina & Pandžić, Hrvoje, 2022. "PV–battery-hydrogen plant: Cutting green hydrogen costs through multi-market positioning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    2. Chao Huang & Zhenyu Zhao & Qingwen Li & Xiong Luo & Long Wang, 2024. "Wind Power Bidding Based on an Ensemble Differential Evolution Algorithm with a Problem-Specific Constraint-Handling Technique," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-14, January.
    3. Kuttner, Leopold, 2022. "Integrated scheduling and bidding of power and reserve of energy resource aggregators with storage plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    4. Smolenski, Robert & Szczesniak, Pawel & Drozdz, Wojciech & Kasperski, Lukasz, 2022. "Advanced metering infrastructure and energy storage for location and mitigation of power quality disturbances in the utility grid with high penetration of renewables," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kuttner, Leopold, 2022. "Integrated scheduling and bidding of power and reserve of energy resource aggregators with storage plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    2. Lopez, A. & Ogayar, B. & Hernández, J.C. & Sutil, F.S., 2020. "Survey and assessment of technical and economic features for the provision of frequency control services by household-prosumers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    3. Fabian Ocker & Karl‐Martin Ehrhart & Marion Ott, 2018. "Bidding strategies in Austrian and German balancing power auctions," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(6), November.
    4. Poplavskaya, Ksenia & Lago, Jesus & de Vries, Laurens, 2020. "Effect of market design on strategic bidding behavior: Model-based analysis of European electricity balancing markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    5. Schillinger, Moritz, 2019. "Balancing Market Design and Opportunity Cost - The Swiss Case," Working papers 2019/14, Faculty of Business and Economics - University of Basel.
    6. Matthew Gough & Sérgio F. Santos & Mohammed Javadi & Rui Castro & João P. S. Catalão, 2020. "Prosumer Flexibility: A Comprehensive State-of-the-Art Review and Scientometric Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-32, May.
    7. Karl-Martin Ehrhart & Fabian Ocker, 2021. "Design and regulation of balancing power auctions: an integrated market model approach," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 55-73, August.
    8. Felix Röben & Hans Schäfers & Anna Meißner & Jerom de Haan, 2021. "Smart Balancing of Electrical Power in Germany: Fuzzy Logic Model to Simulate Market Response," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-25, April.
    9. Bohlayer, Markus & Fleschutz, Markus & Braun, Marco & Zöttl, Gregor, 2020. "Energy-intense production-inventory planning with participation in sequential energy markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    10. Niko Karhula & Seppo Sierla & Valeriy Vyatkin, 2021. "Validating the Real-Time Performance of Distributed Energy Resources Participating on Primary Frequency Reserves," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.
    11. Zakeri, Behnam & Gissey, Giorgio Castagneto & Dodds, Paul E. & Subkhankulova, Dina, 2021. "Centralized vs. distributed energy storage – Benefits for residential users," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    12. Fabian Rücker & Michael Merten & Jingyu Gong & Roberto Villafáfila-Robles & Ilka Schoeneberger & Dirk Uwe Sauer, 2020. "Evaluation of the Effects of Smart Charging Strategies and Frequency Restoration Reserves Market Participation of an Electric Vehicle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-31, June.
    13. Schillinger, Moritz & Weigt, Hannes, 2019. "Bidding into balancing markets in a hydro-dominated electricity system," Working papers 2019/13, Faculty of Business and Economics - University of Basel.
    14. Zhou, Yuekuan & Lund, Peter D., 2023. "Peer-to-peer energy sharing and trading of renewable energy in smart communities ─ trading pricing models, decision-making and agent-based collaboration," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 177-193.
    15. Chen, Yang & Odukomaiya, Adewale & Kassaee, Saiid & O’Connor, Patrick & Momen, Ayyoub M. & Liu, Xiaobing & Smith, Brennan T., 2019. "Preliminary analysis of market potential for a hydropneumatic ground-level integrated diverse energy storage system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 1237-1247.
    16. Casimir Lorenz & Clemens Gerbaulet, 2017. "Wind Providing Balancing Reserves: An Application to the German Electricity System of 2025," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1655, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    17. Finhold, E. & Gärtner, C. & Grindel, R. & Heller, T. & Leithäuser, N. & Röger, E. & Schirra, F., 2023. "Optimizing the marketing of flexibility for a virtual battery in day-ahead and balancing markets: A rolling horizon case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 352(C).
    18. Handriyanti Diah Puspitarini & Baptiste François & Marco Baratieri & Casey Brown & Mattia Zaramella & Marco Borga, 2020. "Complementarity between Combined Heat and Power Systems, Solar PV and Hydropower at a District Level: Sensitivity to Climate Characteristics along an Alpine Transect," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    19. Héctor Marañón-Ledesma & Asgeir Tomasgard, 2019. "Analyzing Demand Response in a Dynamic Capacity Expansion Model for the European Power Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-24, August.
    20. Poplavskaya, Ksenia & de Vries, Laurens, 2019. "Distributed energy resources and the organized balancing market: A symbiosis yet? Case of three European balancing markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 264-276.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:298:y:2021:i:c:s0306261921006851. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.