IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v238y2019icp1573-1581.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Planning strategies to address operational and price uncertainty in biodiesel production

Author

Listed:
  • Caldeira, Carla
  • Swei, Omar
  • Freire, Fausto
  • Dias, Luis C.
  • Olivetti, Elsa A.
  • Kirchain, Randolph

Abstract

The use of low-cost feedstocks such as waste cooking oils has gained prominence in biodiesel production due to its potential economic and environmental advantages. Since these feedstocks are derived from multiple sources, its compositional variability has led to quality concerns that may significantly limit its utilization. One potential strategy to address this concern is to use stochastic blending models to optimize the mixing of secondary and primary oils (e.g., palm, canola, or soya). In this paper, we present a stochastic blending model that embeds a second, key source of uncertainty: the future price of feedstocks, a topic of tremendous concern for producers. The stochastic blending model embeds a chance-constrained formulation to account for compositional variability and uses time-series methods to address feedstock price uncertainty. The model was developed to support production-planning decisions to minimize cost and cost variation in biodiesel production. We demonstrate that the proposed approach is useful for determining an optimal planning of feedstock acquisition, blending and storage in order to minimize the risks associated with feedstock price fluctuations. Results show that addressing the compositional uncertainty via the chance-constrained formulation will allow for the use of waste cooking oil in biodiesel blends without compromising their technical performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Caldeira, Carla & Swei, Omar & Freire, Fausto & Dias, Luis C. & Olivetti, Elsa A. & Kirchain, Randolph, 2019. "Planning strategies to address operational and price uncertainty in biodiesel production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 1573-1581.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:238:y:2019:i:c:p:1573-1581
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.195
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261919302077
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.195?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Ruoran & Deng, Tianhu & Huang, Simin & Qin, Ruwen, 2015. "Optimal crude oil procurement under fluctuating price in an oil refinery," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(2), pages 438-445.
    2. Malça, João & Coelho, António & Freire, Fausto, 2014. "Environmental life-cycle assessment of rapeseed-based biodiesel: Alternative cultivation systems and locations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 837-844.
    3. Venus Khim-Sen Liew, 2004. "Which Lag Length Selection Criteria Should We Employ?," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 3(33), pages 1-9.
    4. Al-Othman, Wafa B.E. & Lababidi, Haitham M.S. & Alatiqi, Imad M. & Al-Shayji, Khawla, 2008. "Supply chain optimization of petroleum organization under uncertainty in market demands and prices," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(3), pages 822-840, September.
    5. A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1959. "Chance-Constrained Programming," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(1), pages 73-79, October.
    6. Tyner Wallace E., 2007. "Policy Alternatives for the Future Biofuels Industry," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 5(2), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Demirbas, Ayhan, 2009. "Political, economic and environmental impacts of biofuels: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(Supplemen), pages 108-117, November.
    8. Dufour, Javier & Iribarren, Diego, 2012. "Life cycle assessment of biodiesel production from free fatty acid-rich wastes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 155-162.
    9. Khishtandar, Soheila, 2019. "Simulation based evolutionary algorithms for fuzzy chance-constrained biogas supply chain design," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 183-195.
    10. Chen, Sheng-Tung & Kuo, Hsiao-I & Chen, Chi-Chung, 2010. "Modeling the relationship between the oil price and global food prices," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(8), pages 2517-2525, August.
    11. Giakoumis, Evangelos G., 2013. "A statistical investigation of biodiesel physical and chemical properties, and their correlation with the degree of unsaturation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 858-878.
    12. Talebian-Kiakalaieh, Amin & Amin, Nor Aishah Saidina & Mazaheri, Hossein, 2013. "A review on novel processes of biodiesel production from waste cooking oil," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 683-710.
    13. Gülşen, Ece & Olivetti, Elsa & Freire, Fausto & Dias, Luis & Kirchain, Randolph, 2014. "Impact of feedstock diversification on the cost-effectiveness of biodiesel," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 281-296.
    14. Moradi, Mohammad H. & Eskandari, Mohsen, 2014. "A hybrid method for simultaneous optimization of DG capacity and operational strategy in microgrids considering uncertainty in electricity price forecasting," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 697-714.
    15. Jahani, Hamed & Abbasi, Babak & Alavifard, Farzad & Talluri, Srinivas, 2018. "Supply chain network redesign with demand and price uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 287-312.
    16. Osmani, Atif & Zhang, Jun, 2014. "Economic and environmental optimization of a large scale sustainable dual feedstock lignocellulosic-based bioethanol supply chain in a stochastic environment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 572-587.
    17. Tyner, Wallace E. & Thaeripour, Farzad, 2007. "Future biofuels policy alternatives," Biofuels, Food and Feed Tradeoffs Conference, April 12-13, 2007, St, Louis, Missouri 48777, Farm Foundation.
    18. Bairamzadeh, Samira & Saidi-Mehrabad, Mohammad & Pishvaee, Mir Saman, 2018. "Modelling different types of uncertainty in biofuel supply network design and planning: A robust optimization approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(PA), pages 500-517.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gourich, Wail & Chan, Eng-Seng & Ng, Wei Zhe & Obon, Aaron Anthony & Maran, Kireshwen & Ong, Yi Hui & Lee, Chin Loong & Tan, Jully & Song, Cher Pin, 2022. "Life cycle benefits of enzymatic biodiesel co-produced in palm oil mills from sludge palm oil as renewable fuel for rural electrification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gülşen, Ece & Olivetti, Elsa & Freire, Fausto & Dias, Luis & Kirchain, Randolph, 2014. "Impact of feedstock diversification on the cost-effectiveness of biodiesel," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 281-296.
    2. Jahani, Hamed & Abbasi, Babak & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Klibi, Walid, 2024. "Supply chain network design with financial considerations: A comprehensive review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(3), pages 799-839.
    3. Ghazale Kordi & Parsa Hasanzadeh-Moghimi & Mohammad Mahdi Paydar & Ebrahim Asadi-Gangraj, 2023. "A multi-objective location-routing model for dental waste considering environmental factors," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 328(1), pages 755-792, September.
    4. Jaeger, William K. & Egelkraut, Thorsten M., 2011. "Biofuel economics in a setting of multiple objectives and unintended consequences," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(9), pages 4320-4333.
    5. Bayramoglu, Basak, 2008. "Efficiency of a Biofuel Subsidy Policy in the Presence of Environmental Externalities," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 44399, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Sadeghi Darvazeh, Saeed & Mansoori Mooseloo, Farzaneh & Gholian-Jouybari, Fatemeh & Amiri, Maghsoud & Bonakdari, Hossein & Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, Mostafa, 2024. "Data-driven robust optimization to design an integrated sustainable forest biomass-to-electricity network under disjunctive uncertainties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).
    7. Jun, Eunju & Joon Kim, Won & Hoon Jeong, Yong & Heung Chang, Soon, 2010. "Measuring the social value of nuclear energy using contingent valuation methodology," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 1470-1476, March.
    8. Zahra Homayouni & Mir Saman Pishvaee & Hamed Jahani & Dmitry Ivanov, 2023. "A robust-heuristic optimization approach to a green supply chain design with consideration of assorted vehicle types and carbon policies under uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 395-435, May.
    9. Christian Langpap & JunJie Wu, 2011. "Potential Environmental Impacts of Increased Reliance on Corn-Based Bioenergy," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 49(2), pages 147-171, June.
    10. David R Just, 2023. "On the policy relevance of agricultural economics," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 50(4), pages 1256-1276.
    11. Zhang, Guoquan & Shang, Jennifer & Li, Wenli, 2011. "Collaborative production planning of supply chain under price and demand uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 215(3), pages 590-603, December.
    12. Hosseini-Motlagh, Seyyed-Mahdi & Samani, Mohammad Reza Ghatreh & Shahbazbegian, Vahid, 2020. "Innovative strategy to design a mixed resilient-sustainable electricity supply chain network under uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    13. Brown, Bijon & Schoney, Richard & Nolan, James, 2021. "Assessing the food vs. fuel issue: An agent-based simulation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    14. Tsoutsos, T.D. & Tournaki, S. & Paraíba, O. & Kaminaris, S.D., 2016. "The Used Cooking Oil-to-biodiesel chain in Europe assessment of best practices and environmental performance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 74-83.
    15. Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, Homa & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Kalogirou, Soteris A. & Gupta, Vijai Kumar & Park, Young-Kwon & Fallahi, Alireza & Sulaiman, Alawi & Ranjbari, Meisam & Rahnama, Hassan & Aghbashl, 2022. "Environmental life cycle assessment of biodiesel production from waste cooking oil: A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    16. Bhattacharya, Suparna & Azzam, Azzeddine M. & Mark, Darrell R., 2009. "Ethanol and Meat in the U.S.: A Multi-Market Analysis," 2009 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 49371, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    17. Ma, Yinjie & Huang, Ronghua & Fu, Jianqin & Huang, Sheng & Liu, Jingping, 2018. "Development of a diesel/biodiesel/alcohol (up to n-pentanol) combined mechanism based on reaction pathways analysis methodology," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 835-847.
    18. Tosarkani, Babak Mohamadpour & Amin, Saman Hassanzadeh & Zolfagharinia, Hossein, 2020. "A scenario-based robust possibilistic model for a multi-objective electronic reverse logistics network," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    19. Awudu, Iddrisu & Zhang, Jun, 2012. "Uncertainties and sustainability concepts in biofuel supply chain management: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 1359-1368.
    20. Brown, Stephen P.A. & Huntington, Hillard G., 2008. "Energy security and climate change protection: Complementarity or tradeoff?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(9), pages 3510-3513, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:238:y:2019:i:c:p:1573-1581. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.