IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agisys/v177y2020ics0308521x19304391.html

Geospatial modeling of conservation tillage and nitrogen timing effects on yield and soil properties

Author

Listed:
  • Liben, F.M.
  • Wortmann, C.S.
  • Tirfessa, A.

Abstract

Crop growth simulation can complement field research for adapting and targeting practices to diverse production areas. Two simulated experiments of 30-year duration were conducted with CERES and CROPGRO to evaluate the effects of fertilizer N practices and conservation tillage (CT) alternatives on maize (Zea mays L.) grain yield, soil organic C and soil organic N for seven technology extrapolation domains (TED) in Ethiopia. Mean maize grain yield was 663kg ha−1 more with three compared two N applications per season for high rainfall TED in western Ethiopia. Tillage did not affect response to N. Averaged across TED, maize yield was 33% more with a combination of conservation tillage, rotation and additional N application (CTr+N) compared maize monoculture with conventional tillage and the recommended N rate (CPmm), primarily because of crop rotation. Maize grain yield increased over time with the conservation tillage under rotation (CTr) but declined under CPmm. Soil organic C and N declined over time, but the rate of decline was lower with CTr+N compared to CPmm. Stored soil organic C and N were 8543 and 594kgha−1 more with CTr+N compared with CPmm, respectively, averaged over the 30 years. First order stochastic dominance analysis from maize grain partial net returns showed that maize rotation dominated maize monoculture. Second order stochastic dominance analysis for partial net return indicated the absence of an unambiguous dominant of conservation tillage for a farmers’ preference of low risk to higher net return or high net return to low risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Liben, F.M. & Wortmann, C.S. & Tirfessa, A., 2020. "Geospatial modeling of conservation tillage and nitrogen timing effects on yield and soil properties," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:177:y:2020:i:c:s0308521x19304391
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102720
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X19304391
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102720?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tittonell, P. & van Wijk, M.T. & Herrero, M. & Rufino, M.C. & de Ridder, N. & Giller, K.E., 2009. "Beyond resource constraints - Exploring the biophysical feasibility of options for the intensification of smallholder crop-livestock systems in Vihiga district, Kenya," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 101(1-2), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Jeffery R. Williams, 1988. "A Stochastic Dominance Analysis of Tillage and Crop Insurance Practices in a Semiarid Region," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 70(1), pages 112-120.
    3. Anderson, Gordon, 1996. "Nonparametric Tests of Stochastic Dominance in Income Distributions," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 64(5), pages 1183-1193, September.
    4. Jalloh, Abdulai & Nelson, Gerald C. & Roy-Macauley, Harold & Thomas, Timothy S. & Zougmoré, Robert, 2013. "West african agriculture and climate change: A comprehensive analysis," Issue briefs 75, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hooi Hooi Lean & Michael McAleer & Wing-Keung Wong, 2013. "Risk-averse and Risk-seeking Investor Preferences for Oil Spot and Futures," Documentos de Trabajo del ICAE 2013-31, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Instituto Complutense de Análisis Económico, revised Aug 2013.
    2. Martha Swamila & Damas Philip & Adam Meshack Akyoo & Julius Manda & Lutengano Mwinuka & Philip J. Smethurst & Stefan Sieber & Anthony Anderson Kimaro, 2021. "Profitability of Gliricidia-Maize System in Selected Dryland Areas of Dodoma Region, Tanzania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Jesus Gonzalo & Jose Olmo, 2014. "Conditional Stochastic Dominance Tests In Dynamic Settings," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 55(3), pages 819-838, August.
    4. Maasoumi, Esfandiar & Almas Heshmati, 2003. "Evaluating Dominance Ranking of PSID Incomes by various Household Attributes," Departmental Working Papers 0509, Southern Methodist University, Department of Economics.
    5. Stephen Leider & Markus M. Möbius & Tanya Rosenblat & Quoc-Anh Do, 2010. "What Do We Expect from Our Friends?," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 8(1), pages 120-138, March.
    6. Enahoro, Dolapo K. & Mensah, Charles & Gbegbelegbe, Sika, 2025. "What do we know about the future of food systems in West and Central Africa?," IFPRI book chapters, in: What do we know about the future of food systems?, chapter 17, pages p. 98-102, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    7. David Lander & David Gunawan & William Griffiths & Duangkamon Chotikapanich, 2020. "Bayesian assessment of Lorenz and stochastic dominance," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(2), pages 767-799, May.
    8. Lean, Hooi Hooi & McAleer, Michael & Wong, Wing-Keung, 2015. "Preferences of risk-averse and risk-seeking investors for oil spot and futures before, during and after the Global Financial Crisis," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 204-216.
    9. Tsang, Chun-Kei & Wong, Wing-Keung & Horowitz, Ira, 2016. "A stochastic-dominance approach to determining the optimal home-size purchase: The case of Hong Kong," MPRA Paper 69175, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Marcel Voia, 2008. "A Distributional Analysis Of Treatment Effects In Randomized Experiments," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 3(36), pages 1-9.
    11. Cherkashin, Ivan & Demidova, Svetlana & Imai, Susumu & Krishna, Kala, 2009. "The inside scoop: Acceptance and rejection at the journal of international economics," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 120-132, February.
    12. De Pinto, Alessandro & Wiebe, Keith D. & Rosegrant, Mark W., 2016. "Climate change and agricultural policy options: A global-to-local approach," Policy briefs 978-089629-244-4, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    13. Nyadzi, Emmanuel, 2016. "Climate Variability Since 1970 and Farmers’ Observations in Northern Ghana," Sustainable Agriculture Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 5(2).
    14. Chunling Luo & Piao Chen & Patrick Jaillet, 2025. "Portfolio Optimization Based on Almost Second-Degree Stochastic Dominance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(8), pages 7029-7055, August.
    15. Grönqvist, Charlotta, 2009. "Empirical studies on the private value of Finnish patents," Bank of Finland Scientific Monographs, Bank of Finland, volume 0, number sm2009_041, December.
    16. Roffeis, Martin & Fitches, Elaine C. & Wakefield, Maureen E. & Almeida, Joana & Alves Valada, Tatiana R. & Devic, Emilie & Koné, N’Golopé & Kenis, Marc & Nacambo, Saidou & Koko, Gabriel K.D. & Mathijs, 2020. "Ex-ante life cycle impact assessment of insect based feed production in West Africa," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    17. Miguel A. Delgado & Juan Carlos Escanciano, 2013. "Conditional Stochastic Dominance Testing," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 16-28, January.
    18. Eihab Fathelrahman & Aydin Basarir & Mohamed Gheblawi & Sherin Sherif & James Ascough, 2014. "Economic Risk and Efficiency Assessment of Fisheries in Abu-Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (UAE): A Stochastic Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(6), pages 1-21, June.
    19. Prato, Tony, 1999. "Multiple attribute decision analysis for ecosystem management," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 207-222, August.
    20. Wong, Wing-Keung & Phoon, Kok Fai & Lean, Hooi Hooi, 2008. "Stochastic dominance analysis of Asian hedge funds," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 204-223, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:177:y:2020:i:c:s0308521x19304391. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agsy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.