IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agisys/v142y2016icp112-121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Designing a three-dimensional performance measurement system (SMD3D) for the wine industry: A Chilean example

Author

Listed:
  • Valenzuela, Lionel
  • Maturana, Sergio

Abstract

Sustainability is a growing concern for companies in the agro-industrial sector, in particular in the wine industry, where Chile is a major player and where performance measurement plays a pivotal role. To address a void in the literature regarding strategic performance measurement in said industry, a three-dimensional performance measurement system (SMD3D) is proposed as a strategic performance measurement system (SPMS). SMD3D encompasses three key dimensions: sustainable, temporal, and spatial. Our research results are supported by 50 surveyed companies with in-depth interviews conducted to managers of such companies. Interestingly, the survey shows that 78% of the companies formally define a strategic plan; only 14% of the total survey sample has the Balanced Scorecard, and 43% of the cases actually use it. In light of this it is found that the current conditions of the wine industry in Chile favor the implementation of such a system, which would enable agricultural enterprises, such as wineries, to address and strategically manage these three important dimensions. Finally, the SMD3D system is compared with various other performance management systems especially developed for the agriculture industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Valenzuela, Lionel & Maturana, Sergio, 2016. "Designing a three-dimensional performance measurement system (SMD3D) for the wine industry: A Chilean example," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 112-121.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:142:y:2016:i:c:p:112-121
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2015.11.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X15300512
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agsy.2015.11.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fabien De Geuser & Stella Mooraj & Daniel Oyon, 2009. "Does the Balanced Scorecard Add Value? Empirical Evidence on its Effect on Performance," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 93-122.
    2. World Commission on Environment and Development,, 1987. "Our Common Future," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780192820808, Decembrie.
    3. Julia Wolf, 2011. "Sustainable Supply Chain Management Integration: A Qualitative Analysis of the German Manufacturing Industry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 102(2), pages 221-235, August.
    4. Estampe, Dominique & Lamouri, Samir & Paris, Jean-Luc & Brahim-Djelloul, Sakina, 2013. "A framework for analysing supply chain performance evaluation models," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(2), pages 247-258.
    5. Henri, Jean-François & Journeault, Marc, 2010. "Eco-control: The influence of management control systems on environmental and economic performance," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 63-80, January.
    6. Rajesh, R. & Pugazhendhi, S. & Ganesh, K. & Ducq, Yves & Lenny Koh, S.C., 2012. "Generic balanced scorecard framework for third party logistics service provider," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 269-282.
    7. R. Scott Marshall & Mark Cordano & Murray Silverman, 2005. "Exploring individual and institutional drivers of proactive environmentalism in the US Wine industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(2), pages 92-109, March.
    8. Ari Paloviita, 2010. "Consumers’ Sustainability Perceptions of the Supply Chain of Locally Produced Food," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 2(6), pages 1-18, June.
    9. Garcia, Fernanda A. & Marchetta, Martin G. & Camargo, Mauricio & Morel, Laure & Forradellas, Raymundo Q., 2012. "A framework for measuring logistics performance in the wine industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 284-298.
    10. Stefan Schaltegger & Marcus Wagner, 2006. "Integrative management of sustainability performance, measurement and reporting," International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(1), pages 1-19.
    11. Andrew Manderson, 2006. "A Systems Based Framework to Examine The Multi-contextural Application of the Sustainability Concept," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 85-97, February.
    12. Hannoura, Alim P. & Cothren, Gianna M. & Khairy, Wael M., 2006. "The development of a sustainable development model framework," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(13), pages 2269-2275.
    13. Gunasekaran, A. & Patel, C. & McGaughey, Ronald E., 2004. "A framework for supply chain performance measurement," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 333-347, February.
    14. Graham Hubbard, 2009. "Measuring organizational performance: beyond the triple bottom line," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(3), pages 177-191, March.
    15. Massimiliano Bonacchi & Leonardo Rinaldi, 2007. "DartBoards and Clovers as new tools in sustainability planning and control," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(7), pages 461-473, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carla Andrade Arteaga & Raúl Rodríguez-Rodríguez & Juan-José Alfaro-Saiz & María-José Verdecho, 2020. "An ANP-Balanced Scorecard Methodology to Quantify the Impact of TQM Elements on Organisational Strategic Sustainable Development: Application to an Oil Firm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-19, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chavatip Chindavijak & Kongkiti Phusavat & Pekka Kess & Suparerk Sooksamarn, 2016. "Transformation to Enterprise Sustainability Case Studies of Manufacturing and Service Enterprise in Thailand," Managing Innovation and Diversity in Knowledge Society Through Turbulent Time: Proceedings of the MakeLearn and TIIM Joint International Conference 2016,, ToKnowPress.
    2. Erik G. Hansen & Stefan Schaltegger, 2016. "The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard: A Systematic Review of Architectures," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(2), pages 193-221, January.
    3. Lueg, Rainer & Radlach, Ronny, 2016. "Managing sustainable development with management control systems: A literature review," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 158-171.
    4. Glover, J.L. & Champion, D. & Daniels, K.J. & Dainty, A.J.D., 2014. "An Institutional Theory perspective on sustainable practices across the dairy supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 102-111.
    5. Chiara Mio & Antonio Costantini & Silvia Panfilo, 2022. "Performance measurement tools for sustainable business: A systematic literature review on the sustainability balanced scorecard use," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(2), pages 367-384, March.
    6. Stefan Schaltegger & Jacob Hörisch, 2017. "In Search of the Dominant Rationale in Sustainability Management: Legitimacy- or Profit-Seeking?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 145(2), pages 259-276, October.
    7. Roger L. Burritt & Stefan Schaltegger, 2010. "Sustainability accounting and reporting: fad or trend?," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 23(7), pages 829-846, September.
    8. Satish Kumar & Weng Marc Lim & Riya Sureka & Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour & Umesh Bamel, 2024. "Balanced scorecard: trends, developments, and future directions," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(8), pages 2397-2439, August.
    9. Chin-Shan Lu & Kuo-Chung Shang & Chi-Chang Lin, 2016. "Examining sustainability performance at ports: port managers’ perspectives on developing sustainable supply chains," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(8), pages 909-927, November.
    10. Ana-Maria Comandaru (Andrei) & Adriana Paduraru (Horaicu), 2021. "Harmonization Of Environmental Management Accounting - Tool For Managing Economic Reconfiguration," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 5, pages 181-200, October.
    11. Anselm Schneider & Erika Meins, 2012. "Two Dimensions of Corporate Sustainability Assessment: Towards a Comprehensive Framework," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(4), pages 211-222, May.
    12. Ivo Hristov & Antonio Chirico & Francesco Ranalli & Riccardo Camilli, 2022. "La pianificazione della sostenibilit? nelle aziende familiari: il ruolo dei key value drivers," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2022(3), pages 109-134.
    13. Burritt, Roger & Schaltegger, Stefan, 2014. "Accounting towards sustainability in production and supply chains," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 327-343.
    14. Nor Azah Abdul Aziz & Tze San Ong & Soon Yau Foong & Rosmila Senik & Hassan Attan, 2018. "Green Initiatives Adoption and Environmental Performance of Public Listed Companies in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, June.
    15. Weigell, Jürgen & Ilin, Igor & Maydanova, Svetlana & Dubgorn, Alissa & Jahn, Carlos & Kersten, Wolfgang, 2020. "Sustainability in arctic maritime supply chains," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Jahn, Carlos & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Data Science in Maritime and City Logistics: Data-driven Solutions for Logistics and Sustainability. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conferen, volume 30, pages 309-336, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    16. Sarah Elena Windolph & Dorli Harms & Stefan Schaltegger, 2014. "Motivations for Corporate Sustainability Management: Contrasting Survey Results and Implementation," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(5), pages 272-285, September.
    17. Ilenia Ascani & Roberta Ciccola & Maria Serena Chiucchi, 2021. "A Structured Literature Review about the Role of Management Accountants in Sustainability Accounting and Reporting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-25, February.
    18. Kaveh Asiaei & Ruzita Jusoh & Omid Barani & Arash Asiaei, 2022. "How does green intellectual capital boost performance? The mediating role of environmental performance measurement systems," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1587-1606, May.
    19. Kai-Michael Griese & Gerrit Hirschfeld & Simon Baringhorst, 2019. "Unternehmen zwischen Digitalisierung und Nachhaltigkeit – eine empirische Untersuchung," Sustainability Nexus Forum, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 11-21, March.
    20. POLLIFRONI Massimo & MILITARU Gheorghe & IOANA Adrian, 2016. ""Diversity Management" Towards "Diversity Engagement": The New Key Drivers For The Corporate Performances," Revista Economica, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 68(3), pages 127-141, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:142:y:2016:i:c:p:112-121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agsy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.