IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ3/2018-05-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of Job Satisfaction and it’s Implication on Employee Performance of Port Enterprises in DKI Jakarta

Author

Listed:
  • Larsen Barasa

    (Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran, Jakarta, Indonesia)

  • April Gunawan

    (Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran, Jakarta, Indonesia)

  • Bambang Sumali

    (Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran, Jakarta, Indonesia)

Abstract

This study aims to examine the determinants of employee job satisfaction and its implications on employee performance at port enterprises in DKI Jakarta. Population in this research is employees at port enterprises. Samples of data amounted to 264 employees and retrieval for instrument test 90 people so that the study population is 421 people. To prove the hypothesis of this study using data collected by statistics, both descriptive and inferential, namely structural equation modeling, consists of sub - structure: Work competence, work motivation and organizational culture as exogenous variables and job satisfaction and performance as endogenous variables. The main structure consists of work competence, work motivation and organizational culture as exogenous variable and job satisfaction as intervening variable and performance as endogen variable. The results showed: (1) There is positive influence and significant work competence to job satisfaction of employees in Port Enterprises DKI Jakarta. (2) There is positive and significant influence of work motivation on job satisfaction of employees. (3) There is a positive and significant influence of organizational culture on employee job satisfaction, where more dominant variable affecting job satisfaction is a variable Competence. (4) There are positive and significant influence of work competence, work motivation and organizational culture together to job satisfaction of employees. (5) There is a positive and significant influence of work competence on employee performance. (6) There is a positive and significant influence of work motivation on employee performance. (7) There is a positive and significant influence of organizational culture on the performance of employees. (8) There is a positive influence and significant job satisfaction on the performance of employees. (9) There are positive and significant influence of work competence, work motivation, organizational culture and job satisfaction together to employee performance, where more dominant variable affecting employee performance is a variable Job satisfaction. From equation structure obtained, it can be concluded by the square multiple correlation (R2) employee performance of 85% is affected by the variable work competence, work motivation, organizational culture and job satisfaction. Job Satisfaction is as full mediating. Employee performance port enterprises DKI Jakarta can be improved by improving the work competence, work motivation, organizational culture and job satisfaction.

Suggested Citation

  • Larsen Barasa & April Gunawan & Bambang Sumali, 2018. "Determinants of Job Satisfaction and it’s Implication on Employee Performance of Port Enterprises in DKI Jakarta," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 8(5), pages 43-49.
  • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ3:2018-05-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/irmm/article/download/6993/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/irmm/article/view/6993/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thakur, Ramendra & Workman, Letty, 2016. "Customer portfolio management (CPM) for improved customer relationship management (CRM): Are your customers platinum, gold, silver, or bronze?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 4095-4102.
    2. Ashley, Christy & Noble, Stephanie M. & Donthu, Naveen & Lemon, Katherine N., 2011. "Why customers won't relate: Obstacles to relationship marketing engagement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(7), pages 749-756, July.
    3. Daniela Abrantes Ferreira & Marcos Gonçalves Avila & Marina Dias de Faria, 2010. "Corporate social responsibility and consumers' perception of price," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(2), pages 208-221, June.
    4. Oosterbeek, Hessel & van Praag, Mirjam & Ijsselstein, Auke, 2010. "The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurship skills and motivation," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 442-454, April.
    5. Yang, Yefei & Lee, Peter K.C. & Cheng, T.C.E., 2016. "Continuous improvement competence, employee creativity, and new service development performance: A frontline employee perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P2), pages 275-288.
    6. Wang, Xiao-Hua (Frank) & Kim, Tae-Yeol & Lee, Deog-Ro, 2016. "Cognitive diversity and team creativity: Effects of team intrinsic motivation and transformational leadership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3231-3239.
    7. Nada Al Mehrzi & Sanjay Kumar Singh, 2016. "Competing through employee engagement: a proposed framework," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 65(6), pages 831-843, July.
    8. Landström, Hans & Harirchi, Gouya & Åström, Fredrik, 2012. "Entrepreneurship: Exploring the knowledge base," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(7), pages 1154-1181.
    9. Norman R. Smith & John B. Miner, 1983. "Type of entrepreneur, type of firm, and managerial motivation: Implications for organizational life cycle theory," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(4), pages 325-340, October.
    10. Neha Gupta & Vandna Sharma, 2016. "Exploring Employee Engagement—A Way to Better Business Performance," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 17(3_suppl), pages 45-63, June.
    11. Park, Eun Joo & Kim, Eun Young & Funches, Venessa Martin & Foxx, William, 2012. "Apparel product attributes, web browsing, and e-impulse buying on shopping websites," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(11), pages 1583-1589.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yong-Sun Chang & Jian Hui Guo & Joel M. Evans, 2023. "Flexible but stable: the mediated influence of an organization’s culture on performance," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(1), pages 463-492, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abdul Razak & Sarpan Sarpan & Ramlan Ramlan, 2018. "Effect of Leadership Style, Motivation and Work Discipline on Employee Performance in PT. ABC Makassar," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 8(6), pages 67-71.
    2. Utin Nina Hermina & Sri Yanthy Yosepha, 2019. "The Model of Employee Performance," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 9(3), pages 69-73.
    3. Meswantri Meswantri & Awaludin Ilyas, 2018. "Determinant of Employee Engagement and Its Implications on Employee Performance," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 8(3), pages 36-44.
    4. Wachyu Hari Haji, 2018. "Determinants of Work Motivation and It's Implication on Performance of Permanent Lecturers of Private Universities with Accreditation Institution A in Kopertis Region III," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 8(6), pages 8-14.
    5. Dwi Sihono Raharjo & Sulistiasih Sulistiasih, 2019. "The Model of Manufacturing Industries Employee Performance," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 9(5), pages 82-86.
    6. Farid Ma'ruf & Ita Reinita Hadari & Dini Amalia, 2019. "Employee Motivation and Performance Models," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 9(6), pages 80-86.
    7. Saeed Mujahid & Shujaat Mubarik & Navaz Naghavi, 2019. "Prioritizing dimensions of entrepreneurial ecosystem: a proposed framework," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 9(1), pages 1-21, December.
    8. Subaebasni Subaebasni & Henny Risnawaty & A.R. Arie Wicaksono, 2019. "Effect of Brand Image, the Quality and Price on Customer Satisfaction and Implications for Customer Loyalty PT Strait Liner Express in Jakarta," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 9(1), pages 90-97.
    9. Nurmala Nurmala, 2018. "Building Competitive Advantage for Economic Performance: A Study of the Palm Plantation Company in West Kalimantan," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 8(5), pages 172-183.
    10. Hendrik Gomar Sinaga & Moch. Asmawi & R. Madhakomala & Adji Suratman, 2018. "Effect of Change in Management, Organizational Culture and Transformational Leadership on Employee Performance PT. AdhyaTirta Batam (PT. ATB)," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 8(6), pages 15-23.
    11. Clara Cardone-Riportella & María José Casasola-Martinez & Isabel Feito-Ruiz, 2014. "Do Entrepreneurs Come From Venus Or Mars? Impact Of Postgraduate Studies: Gender And Family Business Background," Working Papers 14.04, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Financial Economics and Accounting (former Department of Business Administration), revised Sep 2014.
    12. Ruijie Zhu & Guojing Zhao & Zehai Long & Yangjie Huang & Zhaoxin Huang, 2022. "Entrepreneurship or Employment? A Survey of College Students’ Sustainable Entrepreneurial Intentions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, May.
    13. Jan Wiers & Didier Chabaud, 2022. "Bibliometric analysis of immigrant entrepreneurship research 2009–2019," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 12(1), pages 441-464, December.
    14. Yanto Chandra, 2018. "Mapping the evolution of entrepreneurship as a field of research (1990–2013): A scientometric analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, January.
    15. Minguez, Ana & Javier Sese, F., 2022. "Why do you want a relationship, anyway? Consent to receive marketing communications and donors’ willingness to engage with nonprofits," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 356-367.
    16. Muhammad Shahid Qureshi & Saadat Saeed & Syed Waleed Mehmood Wasti, 2016. "The impact of various entrepreneurial interventions during the business plan competition on the entrepreneur identity aspirations of participants," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 6(1), pages 1-18, December.
    17. Piñeiro-Chousa, Juan & López-Cabarcos, M. Ángeles & Romero-Castro, Noelia María & Pérez-Pico, Ada María, 2020. "Innovation, entrepreneurship and knowledge in the business scientific field: Mapping the research front," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 475-485.
    18. Wim Naudé, 2016. "Is European Entrepreneurship in Crisis?," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 14(03), pages 03-07, October.
    19. Leonidas A. Zampetakis & Manolis Lerakis & Konstantinos Kafetsios & Vassilis S. Moustakis, 2016. "The moderating role of anticipated affective ambivalence in the formation of entrepreneurial intentions," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 815-838, September.
    20. Higgins, Lindsey M. & Schroeter, Christiane & Wright, Carlyn, 2018. "Lighting the flame of entrepreneurship among agribusiness students," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 21(1).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Work Competence; Work Motivation; Organizational Culture; Job Satisfaction; Employee Performance;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M12 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Personnel Management; Executives; Executive Compensation
    • N30 - Economic History - - Labor and Consumers, Demography, Education, Health, Welfare, Income, Wealth, Religion, and Philanthropy - - - General, International, or Comparative
    • Q15 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Land Ownership and Tenure; Land Reform; Land Use; Irrigation; Agriculture and Environment

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ3:2018-05-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ilhan Ozturk (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econjournals.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.