IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ2/2021-06-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Electric Power Bid Determination and Evaluation for Price Taker Units under Price Uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmet Yucekaya

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Kadir Has University, 34083, Turkey)

  • Jorge Valenzuela

    (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 304 Shelby Center, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama 36849, USA.)

Abstract

Power companies aim to maximize their profit which is highly related to the bidding strategies used. In order to sell electricity at high prices and maximize their profit, power companies need suitable bidding models that consider power operating constraints and price uncertainty within the market. Price taker units have no power to affect the prices but need to determine their best bidding strategy to maximize their profit assuming a quadratic cost function and uncertain market prices. Price taker units also need to evaluate their bidding strategy under different price scenarios. In this paper, we first model the bidding problem for a price taker unit and then propose quadratic programming, nonlinear programming and marginal cost based bidding models under price uncertainty. We use case studies to study the computation burden and limitation to reach a solution. We also propose a simulation methodology to evaluate the performance of each bidding strategy for different market prices in an effort to help decision makers to assess their bidding decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmet Yucekaya & Jorge Valenzuela, 2021. "Electric Power Bid Determination and Evaluation for Price Taker Units under Price Uncertainty," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(6), pages 35-42.
  • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:2021-06-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/download/11382/6099
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/view/11382/6099
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Cramton, 2017. "Electricity market design," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 33(4), pages 589-612.
    2. Davatgaran, Vahid & Saniei, Mohsen & Mortazavi, Seyed Saeidollah, 2018. "Optimal bidding strategy for an energy hub in energy market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 482-493.
    3. Daniel R. Jiang & Warren B. Powell, 2015. "Optimal Hour-Ahead Bidding in the Real-Time Electricity Market with Battery Storage Using Approximate Dynamic Programming," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 525-543, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bjørndal, Endre & Bjørndal, Mette Helene & Coniglio, Stefano & Körner, Marc-Fabian & Leinauer, Christina & Weibelzahl, Martin, 2023. "Energy storage operation and electricity market design: On the market power of monopolistic storage operators," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(2), pages 887-909.
    2. Schreiner, Lena & Madlener, Reinhard, 2022. "Investing in power grid infrastructure as a flexibility option: A DSGE assessment for Germany," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    3. Scott Duke Kominers & Alexander Teytelboym & Vincent P Crawford, 2017. "An invitation to market design," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 33(4), pages 541-571.
    4. Keppler, Jan Horst & Quemin, Simon & Saguan, Marcelo, 2022. "Why the sustainable provision of low-carbon electricity needs hybrid markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    5. Benedikt Finnah, 2022. "Optimal bidding functions for renewable energies in sequential electricity markets," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 44(1), pages 1-27, March.
    6. Ghadimi, Saeed & Powell, Warren B., 2024. "Stochastic search for a parametric cost function approximation: Energy storage with rolling forecasts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(2), pages 641-652.
    7. Kim, Eun-Hwan & Park, Yong-Gi & Roh, Jae Hyung, 2019. "Competitiveness of open-cycle gas turbine and its potential in the future Korean electricity market with high renewable energy mix," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 1056-1069.
    8. Peter Cramton, 2022. "Fostering Resiliency with Good Market Design: Lessons from Texas," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 145, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    9. Martin Bichler & Johannes Knörr & Felipe Maldonado, 2023. "Pricing in Nonconvex Markets: How to Price Electricity in the Presence of Demand Response," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 652-675, June.
    10. Yu Huang & Weiting Zhang & Kai Yang & Weizhen Hou & Yiran Huang, 2019. "An Optimal Scheduling Method for Multi-Energy Hub Systems Using Game Theory," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-20, June.
    11. Peter Cramton & Emmanuele Bobbio & David Malec & Pat Sujarittanonta, 2022. "Electricity Markets in Transition: A Multi-Decade Micro-Model of Entry and Exit in Advanced Wholesale Markets," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 183, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    12. Mier, Mathias, 2021. "Efficient pricing of electricity revisited," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    13. Boldrini, A. & Jiménez Navarro, J.P. & Crijns-Graus, W.H.J. & van den Broek, M.A., 2022. "The role of district heating systems to provide balancing services in the European Union," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    14. Deakin, Matthew & Bloomfield, Hannah & Greenwood, David & Sheehy, Sarah & Walker, Sara & Taylor, Phil C., 2021. "Impacts of heat decarbonization on system adequacy considering increased meteorological sensitivity," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    15. Fuat Oğuz, 2020. "Hayekian complexity and the role of regulation in electricity markets," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 406-418, October.
    16. Mestre, Guillermo & Sánchez-Úbeda, Eugenio F. & Muñoz San Roque, Antonio & Alonso, Estrella, 2022. "The arithmetic of stepwise offer curves," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    17. Magda I. El-Afifi & Magdi M. Saadawi & Abdelfattah A. Eladl, 2022. "Cogeneration Systems Performance Analysis as a Sustainable Clean Energy and Water Source Based on Energy Hubs Using the Archimedes Optimization Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-26, November.
    18. Richstein, Jörn C. & Lorenz, Casimir & Neuhoff, Karsten, 2020. "An auction story: How simple bids struggle with uncertainty," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    19. Thomas Pownall & Iain Soutar & Catherine Mitchell, 2021. "Re-Designing GB’s Electricity Market Design: A Conceptual Framework Which Recognises the Value of Distributed Energy Resources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-26, February.
    20. Liu, Yang & Xie, Jiaohong & Chen, Nan, 2022. "Stochastic one-way carsharing systems with dynamic relocation incentives through preference learning," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Bidding; nonlinear programming; quadratic programming; simulation; electricity markets;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L94 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Electric Utilities
    • D44 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Auctions
    • D47 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Market Design
    • E17 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - General Aggregative Models - - - Forecasting and Simulation: Models and Applications

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:2021-06-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ilhan Ozturk (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econjournals.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.