IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Les déterminants de l’existence et de l’indépendance managériale des comités de rémunération et de sélection en France

  • Charles Piot


    (Ecole Supérieure de Commerce de Montpellier)

Registered author(s):

    (VF)Cette étude aborde, dans le cadre français, les déterminants de l’existence et de l’indépendance managériale des comités de rémunération et de sélection des administrateurs et mandataires sociaux. Les hypothèses relèvent du cadre théorique de l’agence, dans lequel l’opportunisme managérial justifie la mise en œuvre de mécanismes disciplinaires efficaces. L’échantillon est composé des groupes industriels et commerciaux du SBF 120, sur la période 1999-2001. Les analyses logistiques suggèrent que l’existence des comités de rémunération répond effectivement à une demande d’encadrement de la relation d’agence actionnaires-dirigeants, alors que ce facteur n’a qu’un effet très marginal au niveau des comités de sélection. Par ailleurs, l’actionnariat managérial n’explique pas le fait que ces deux types de comités soient exempts de cadres dirigeants.(VA)This paper investigates the determinants of the existence and managerial independence of remuneration and nominating board committees in the French context. Our hypotheses rely on the agency theory framework, in which managers’ opportunism justifies the im-plementation of effective monitoring devices. The sample comprises non-financial companies of the SBF 120 index, over the 1999-2001 period. Logistic analyses suggest that the existence of remuneration committees results from monitoring needs induced by the shareholder-manager agency relationship, whereas this is far less the case with respect to nominating committees. Furthermore, managers’ ownership does not explain the fact that both types of committee exclude top managers.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by in its journal Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie.

    Volume (Year): 9 (2006)
    Issue (Month): 2 (June)
    Pages: 159-185

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:dij:revfcs:v:9:y:2006:i:q2:p:159-185
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Email:

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    as in new window
    1. Anil Shivdasani & David Yermack, 1998. "CEO Involvement in the Selection of New Board Members: An Empirical Analysis," New York University, Leonard N. Stern School Finance Department Working Paper Seires 98-059, New York University, Leonard N. Stern School of Business-.
    2. Smith, Clifford Jr. & Watts, Ross L., 1992. "The investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend, and compensation policies," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 263-292, December.
    3. Bradbury, Michael E., 1990. "The incentives for voluntary audit committee formation," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 19-36.
    4. Gaver, Jennifer J. & Gaver, Kenneth M., 1993. "Additional evidence on the association between the investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend, and compensation policies," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1-3), pages 125-160, April.
    5. Arthur, N., 2001. "Board composition as the outcome of an internal bargaining process: empirical evidence," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 307-340, September.
    6. Pincus, Karen & Rusbarsky, Mark & Wong, Jilnaught, 1989. "Voluntary formation of corporate audit committees among NASDAQ firms," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 8(4), pages 239-265.
    7. Anderson, Ronald C. & Bizjak, John M., 2003. "An empirical examination of the role of the CEO and the compensation committee in structuring executive pay," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 27(7), pages 1323-1348, July.
    8. Nikos Vafeas, 2003. "Further Evidence on Compensation Committee Composition as a Determinant of CEO Compensation," Financial Management, Financial Management Association, vol. 32(2), Summer.
    9. Fama, Eugene F & Jensen, Michael C, 1983. "Separation of Ownership and Control," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 26(2), pages 301-25, June.
    10. Nikos Vafeas, 1999. "The Nature of Board Nominating Committees and Their Role in Corporate Governance," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1-2), pages 199-225.
    11. Harry A. Newman & Haim A. Mozes, 1999. "Does the Composition of the Compensation Committee Influence CEO Compensation Practices?," Financial Management, Financial Management Association, vol. 28(3), Fall.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dij:revfcs:v:9:y:2006:i:q2:p:159-185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Gérard Charreaux)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.