IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dem/demres/v50y2024i25.html

The importance of correcting for health-related survey non-response when estimating health expectancies: Evidence from The HUNT Study

Author

Listed:
  • Fred Schroyen

    (Norges Handelshøyskole)

Abstract

Background: Most studies on health expectancies rely on self-reported health from surveys to measure the prevalence of disabilities or ill health in a population. At best, such studies only correct for sample selection based on a limited number of characteristics observed on the invitees. Objective: Using longitudinal data from the Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT), I investigate the extent to which adjustments for a health-related sample selection affect the age profiles for the prevalence of functional impairment (FI) and the associated disability-free life expectancy (DFLE). Methods: I estimate a probit model with sample selection under the identifying restriction that the strength of the health-related selection is of similar order to the strength of the selection on observable characteristics. I then compute the selection-adjusted FI prevalence rates and trace out the implications for DFLE using the Sullivan method. Results: The analysis confirms that poor health measured at younger ages correlates with nonresponse behaviour in later waves of the survey, and that even for a conservative lower bound for the assumed degree of health-related selection, the estimated age profiles for DFLE lie systematically below the corresponding profiles when controlling only for selection on observable characteristics. Conclusions: Health related non-response downwardly biases the raw sample prevalence rates for FI obtained from survey data and contributes to overestimating the expansion in DFLE. Contribution: I present a statistical framework for taking health-related survey non-responses into account when estimating the prevalence rate of FI. The framework can be used to gauge the sensitivity of estimated (changes in) DFLE to health-related sample selection.

Suggested Citation

  • Fred Schroyen, 2024. "The importance of correcting for health-related survey non-response when estimating health expectancies: Evidence from The HUNT Study," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 50(25), pages 667-732.
    • Handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:50:y:2024:i:25
    DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2024.50.25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol50/25/50-25.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4054/DemRes.2024.50.25?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Imai, Kosuke & Soneji, Samir, 2007. "On the Estimation of Disability-Free Life Expectancy: Sullivan's Method and Its Extension," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 102, pages 1199-1211, December.
    2. James J. Heckman, 1976. "The Common Structure of Statistical Models of Truncation, Sample Selection and Limited Dependent Variables and a Simple Estimator for Such Models," NBER Chapters, in: Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, Volume 5, number 4, pages 475-492, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Bruce D. Meyer & Wallace K. C. Mok & James X. Sullivan, 2015. "Household Surveys in Crisis," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 29(4), pages 199-226, Fall.
    4. Van de Ven, Wynand P. M. M. & Van Praag, Bernard M. S., 1981. "The demand for deductibles in private health insurance : A probit model with sample selection," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 229-252, November.
    5. Joseph G. Altonji & Todd E. Elder & Christopher R. Taber, 2005. "Selection on Observed and Unobserved Variables: Assessing the Effectiveness of Catholic Schools," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 113(1), pages 151-184, February.
    6. Patrick Puhani, 2000. "The Heckman Correction for Sample Selection and Its Critique," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(1), pages 53-68, February.
    7. James Heckman, 2013. "Sample selection bias as a specification error," Applied Econometrics, Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 31(3), pages 129-137.
    8. Paul Contoyannis & Andrew M. Jones & Nigel Rice, 2004. "The dynamics of health in the British Household Panel Survey," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(4), pages 473-503.
    9. F. Kreuter & K. Olson & J. Wagner & T. Yan & T. M. Ezzati‐Rice & C. Casas‐Cordero & M. Lemay & A. Peytchev & R. M. Groves & T. E. Raghunathan, 2010. "Using proxy measures and other correlates of survey outcomes to adjust for non‐response: examples from multiple surveys," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 173(2), pages 389-407, April.
    10. Giuseppe De Luca & Valeria Perotti, 2011. "Estimation of ordered response models with sample selection," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 11(2), pages 213-239, June.
    11. Liming Cai & James Lubitz, 2007. "Was there compression of disability for older Americans from 1992 to 2003?," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 44(3), pages 479-495, August.
    12. repec:cai:popine:popu_p1999_11n1_0034 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meghan M. Mitchell & Chantal Fahmy & Kendra J. Clark & David C. Pyrooz, 2022. "Non-random Study Attrition: Assessing Correction Techniques and the Magnitude of Bias in a Longitudinal Study of Reentry from Prison," Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 755-790, September.
    2. Maarten Goos & Anna Salomons, 2017. "Measuring teaching quality in higher education: assessing selection bias in course evaluations," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 58(4), pages 341-364, June.
    3. Christine Fauvelle-Aymar & Abel François, 2018. "Place of registration and place of residence: the non-linear detrimental impact of transportation cost on electoral participation," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 176(3), pages 405-440, September.
    4. Cumming, Douglas & Fleming, Grant & Schwienbacher, Armin, 2006. "Legality and venture capital exits," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 214-245, January.
    5. Kabo, Felichism W. & Cotton-Nessler, Natalie & Hwang, Yongha & Levenstein, Margaret C. & Owen-Smith, Jason, 2014. "Proximity effects on the dynamics and outcomes of scientific collaborations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(9), pages 1469-1485.
    6. Watanabe, Hajime & Maruyama, Takuya, 2024. "A Bayesian sample selection model with a binary outcome for handling residential self-selection in individual car ownership," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    7. Petra Andries & Dirk Czarnitzki, 2014. "Small firm innovation performance and employee involvement," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 21-38, June.
    8. Che-Wei Liu & Guodong (Gordon) Gao & Ritu Agarwal, 2019. "Unraveling the “Social” in Social Norms: The Conditioning Effect of User Connectivity," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 1272-1295, April.
    9. repec:aer:wpaper:336 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Croux, Christophe & Jagtiani, Julapa & Korivi, Tarunsai & Vulanovic, Milos, 2020. "Important factors determining Fintech loan default: Evidence from a lendingclub consumer platform," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 270-296.
    11. Cristian Castillo & Julimar Da Silva & Sandro Monsueto, 2020. "Objectives of Sustainable Development and Youth Employment in Colombia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, January.
    12. William H. Greene & David A. Hensher, 2008. "Modeling Ordered Choices: A Primer and Recent Developments," Working Papers 08-26, New York University, Leonard N. Stern School of Business, Department of Economics.
    13. Villarreal, Francisco G., 2014. "Financial Services and Household Inequality in Mexico," MPRA Paper 57075, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Summerfield, Fraser, 2014. "Labor Market Conditions, Skill Requirements and Education Mismatch," CLSSRN working papers clsrn_admin-2014-19, Vancouver School of Economics, revised 28 Apr 2014.
    15. Anjali Adukia & Richard Hornbeck & Daniel Keniston & Benjamin Lualdi, 2025. "The Social and Statistical Construction of Race," NBER Working Papers 33502, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. In Jung Song & Inhyuck “Steve” Ha & Won Fy Lee & Minjung Choi, 2024. "An examination of the impact of health insurance enrollment in reducing racial health disparities," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 48(1), pages 196-213, March.
    17. Pierfrancesco Alaimo Di Loro & Daria Scacciatelli & Giovanna Tagliaferri, 2023. "2-step Gradient Boosting approach to selectivity bias correction in tax audit: an application to the VAT gap in Italy," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 32(1), pages 237-270, March.
    18. Margaret Giles, 2003. "Correcting for selectivity bias in the estimation of road crash costs," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(11), pages 1291-1301.
    19. Ereney Hadjigeorgalis, 2004. "Comerciando con Incertidumbre: Los Mercados de Agua en la Agricultura Chilena," Latin American Journal of Economics-formerly Cuadernos de Economía, Instituto de Economía. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile., vol. 41(122), pages 3-34.
    20. Marra Giampiero & Radice Rosalba, 2017. "A joint regression modeling framework for analyzing bivariate binary data in R," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 268-294, December.
    21. Annick Pamen Nyola & Alain Sauviat & Amine Tarazi, 2022. "How does regulation affect the organizational form of foreign banks' presence in developing versus developed countries?," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(2), pages 2367-2419, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:50:y:2024:i:25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.demogr.mpg.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.